2025-01-20
Credibility Assessment of EMC Uncertainty Analysis Based on Failure Rate
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 124, 55-61, 2025
Abstract
Uncertainty analysis has been widely used in electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) simulation. However, a comprehensive credibility assessment system for it has yet to be established. In this article, the concepts of failure domain and failure rate are introduced from the perspective of the practical application of uncertainty analysis methods. The study aims to assess the reliability of uncertainty analysis method from the perspective of system failure, providing a theoretical basis for guiding practical electromagnetic compatibility design through uncertainty analysis.
Citation
Shenghang Huo, Zhengyu Xue, Yuhan Zhou, Jinming Yao, and Jinjun Bai, "Credibility Assessment of EMC Uncertainty Analysis Based on Failure Rate," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 124, 55-61, 2025.
doi:10.2528/PIERL24112906
References

1. IEEE Standard Association, "IEEE Standard for Validation of Computational Electromagnetics Computer Modeling and Simulations," IEEE Std. 1597.1-2008, 1-41, 2008.        Google Scholar

2. IEEE Standard Association, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Validation of Computational Electromagnetics Computer Modeling and Simulations," IEEE Std.1597.2-2010, 1-124, 2011.        Google Scholar

3. Orlandi, A., G. Antonini, C. Polisini, A. Duffy, and H. Sasse, "Progress in the development of a 2D feature selective validation (FSV) method," 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 1-6, Detroit, MI, USA, Aug. 2008.

4. Zhang, Gang, Alistair P. Duffy, Hugh Sasse, Lixin Wang, and Ricardo Jauregui, "Improvement in the definition of ODM for FSV," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 55, No. 4, 773-779, Aug. 2013.        Google Scholar

5. Zhang, Gang, Alistair P. Duffy, Antonio Orlandi, Danilo Di Febo, Lixin Wang, and Hugh Sasse, "Comparison of data with multiple degrees of freedom utilizing the feature selective validation method," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 58, No. 3, 784-791, Jun. 2016.        Google Scholar

6. IEEE Standard Association, "IEEE Standard for Validation of Computational Electromagnetics Computer Modeling and Simulations," IEEE Std. 1597.1-2022, 1-52, 2022.        Google Scholar

7. Bai, Jinjun, Yixuan Wan, Ming Li, Gang Zhang, and Xin He, "Reduction of random variables in EMC uncertainty simulation model," Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal (ACES), Vol. 37, No. 9, 941-947, Sep. 2022.        Google Scholar

8. Tan, Tianhong, Tao Jiang, Haolin Jiang, Tianhao Wang, and Mingjuan Cai, "Uncertainty quantification method of crosstalk involving braided-shielded cable," Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal (ACES), Vol. 38, No. 1, 28-35, Jan. 2023.        Google Scholar

9. Jauregui, Ricardo, Marc Aragon, and Ferran Silva, "The role of uncertainty in the feature selective validation (FSV) method," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 55, No. 1, 217-220, Feb. 2013.        Google Scholar

10. Ferson, Scott, William L. Oberkampf, and Lev Ginzburg, "Model validation and predictive capability for the thermal challenge problem," Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 197, No. 29-32, 2408-2430, May 2008.        Google Scholar

11. Bai, Jinjun, Lixin Wang, Di Wang, Alistair P. Duffy, and Gang Zhang, "Validity evaluation of the uncertain EMC simulation results," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 59, No. 3, 797-804, Jun. 2017.        Google Scholar

12. Bai, Jinjun, Gang Zhang, Di Wang, Alistair P. Duffy, and Lixin Wang, "Performance comparison of the SGM and the SCM in EMC simulation," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 58, No. 6, 1739-1746, Dec. 2016.        Google Scholar

13. Trinchero, Riccardo, Mourad Larbi, Hakki M. Torun, Flavio G. Canavero, and Madhavan Swaminathan, "Machine learning and uncertainty quantification for surrogate models of integrated devices with a large number of parameters," IEEE Access, Vol. 7, 4056-4066, 2018.        Google Scholar

14. Han, Zhong-Hua and Stefan Görtz, "Hierarchical kriging model for variable-fidelity surrogate modeling," AIAA Journal, Vol. 50, No. 9, 1885-1896, Sep. 2012.
doi:10.2514/1.J051354        Google Scholar

15. Robinson, M. P., T. M. Benson, C. Christopoulos, J. F. Dawson, M. D. Ganley, A. C. Marvin, S. J. Porter, and D. W. P. Thomas, "Analytical formulation for the shielding effectiveness of enclosures with apertures," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 40, No. 3, 240-248, Aug. 1998.        Google Scholar

16. Chinese Standard, GB/T 50719-2011, Technical code for electromagnetic shielded enclosure.

17. Bai, Jinjun, Kaibin Guo, Jingchao Sun, and Ning Wang, "Application of the multi-element grid in EMC uncertainty simulation," Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal (ACES), Vol. 37, No. 4, 428-434, Apr. 2022.        Google Scholar