2012-02-17
Three-Dimensional Wedge Diffraction Correction Deduced by the Stationary Phase Method on the Modified Equivalent Current Approximation (Meca)
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 23, 207-227, 2012
Abstract
This paper presents a new method for computing fields diffracted by a wedge for the MECA formulation, which is valid not only for perfect electric conductors but also for lossy penetrable dielectrics. The method is based on the computation of a wedge correction matrix, which establishes a mapping function between fields incident at and diffracted by the wedge. The MECA method is based, in general, upon the oblique incidence of a plane wave at the interface between free space and lossy dielectric media. MECA reduces to the well-studied physical optics (PO) formulation in case of PEC (perfect electric conductor) scatterers. In this work, we consider a scenario involving diffraction caused by a plane wavefront incident on a wedge with flat faces and straight edge. The version of the stationary phase method for three-dimensional equivalent source distributions is employed to calculate the asymptotic contribution of the integration boundary along the edge of the diffraction wedge. This contribution of the critical boundary points is compared to the GTD (geometrical theory of diffraction) diffracted field in order to obtain the correction matrix by which the incident electric field vector is multiplied in MECA. As required to accomplish this comparison, the three-dimensional incident electric field is previously resolved into an edge-fixed coordinate system. Good agreement is demonstrated between full-wave method-of-moments (MoM) results and the results obtained by modifying MECA with our diffraction correction technique. is demonstrated between full-wave method-of-moments (MoM) results and the results obtained by modifying MECA with our diffraction correction technique.
Citation
Hipolito Gomez-Sousa, Jose Angel Martinez-Lorenzo, and Oscar Rubiños-López, "Three-Dimensional Wedge Diffraction Correction Deduced by the Stationary Phase Method on the Modified Equivalent Current Approximation (Meca)," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 23, 207-227, 2012.
doi:10.2528/PIERM11111808
References

1. Meana, J. G., J. A. Martinez-Lorenzo, F. Las-Heras, and C. Rappaport, "Wave scattering by dielectric and lossy materials using the modified equivalent current approximation (MECA)," IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propag., Vol. 58, No. 11, 3757-3761, 2010.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2010.2071363        Google Scholar

2. Meana, J. G., J. A. Martinez-Lorenzo, F. Las-Heras, and C. Rappaport, "A PO-MoM comparison for electrically large dielectric geometries," IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, APSURSI'09, June 1-5, 2009.        Google Scholar

3. James, G. L., Geometrical Theory of Diffraction for Electromagnetic Waves,, Peregrinus, Stevenage, U.K., 1980.

4. Lee, S. W., "Comparison of uniform asymptotic theory and Ufimtsev's theory of electromagnetic edge diffraction," IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propag., Vol. 25, No. 2, 162-170, 1977.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1977.1141559        Google Scholar

5. Ufimtsev, P. Y., "Method of edge waves in the physical theory of diffraction,", Air Force System Command, Foreign Tech. Div., ID No. FTD-HC-23-259-71, 1971.        Google Scholar

6. Ufimtsev, P. Y., Fundamentals of the Physical Theory of Diffraction, Wiley, New Jersey, 2007.
doi:10.1002/0470109017

7. Conde, O., J. Perez, and M. F. Catedra, "Stationary phase method application for the analysis of radiation of complex 3-D conducting structures," IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propag., Vol. 49, No. 5, 724-731, 2001.
doi:10.1109/8.929626        Google Scholar

8. Saez de Adana, F., et al. Practical Applications of Asymptotic Techniques in Electromagnetics, Artech House, 2010.

9. Umul, Y. Z., "Modified theory of physical optics," Opt. Express, Vol. 12, No. 20, 4959-4972, 2004.
doi:10.1364/OPEX.12.004959        Google Scholar

10. Sakina, K., S. Cui, and M. Ando, "Mathematical derivation of modified edge representation for reduction of surface radiation integral," IEICE Trans. Electron., Vol. E84-C, No. 1, 74-83, 2001.        Google Scholar

11. Shijo, T., L. Rodriguez, and M. Ando, "The modified-surface normal vectors in the physical optics," IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propag., Vol. 56, No. 12, 3714-3722, 2008.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2008.2007276        Google Scholar

12. McNamara, D. A., C. W. I. Pistorius, and J. A. G. Malherbe, Introduction to the Uniform Geometrical Theory of Diffraction, Artech House, Norwood, MA, 1990.

13. Staelin, D. H., A. W. Morgenthaler, and J. A. Kong, Electromagnetic Waves, Prentice Hall, USA, 1994.

14. Shijo, T. and M. Ando, "Elimination of fictitious penetrating rays from PO and hybridization with AFIM," Electrical Engineering in Japan, Vol. 150, No. 2, 2005. [Translated from Denki Gakkai Ronbunshi, Vol. 123-A, No. 12, 1185-1192, Dec. 2003]..
doi:10.1002/eej.20037        Google Scholar

15. Luebbers, R. J., "Finite conductivity uniform GTD versus knife edge diffraction in prediction of propagation path loss," IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propag., Vol. 32, No. 1, 70-76, 1984.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1984.1143189        Google Scholar

16. Keller, J. B., "Geometrical theory of diffraction," J. Opt. Soc. Amer., Vol. 52, 116-130, 1962.        Google Scholar

17. Soni, S. and A. Bhattacharya, "Novel three-dimensional dyadic diffraction coeffcient for wireless channel," Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, Vol. 52, No. 9, 2132-2136, 2010.
doi:10.1002/mop.25402        Google Scholar

18. Constantinides, E. D. and R. J. Marhefka, "A UGO/EUTD solution for the scattering and diffraction from cubic polynomial strips," IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propag., Vol. 41, No. 8, 1088-1098, 1993.
doi:10.1109/8.244650        Google Scholar

19. Gomez-Sousa, H., J. A. Martinez-Lorenzo, O. Rubinos-Lopez, J. G. Meana, M. Grana-Varela, B. Gonzalez-Valdes, and M. Arias-Acuna, "Strategies for improving the use of the memory hierarchy in an implementation of the modified equivalent current approximation (MECA) method," ACES Journal, Vol. 25, No. 10, 841-852, 2010.        Google Scholar

20. Gennarelli, G. and G. Riccio, "Diffraction by a lossy double-negative metamaterial layer: A uniform asymptotic solution," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 13, 173-180, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIERL10030906        Google Scholar

21. Medgyesi-Mitschang, L. N., J. M. Putnam, and M. B. Gedera, "Generalized method of moments for three-dimensional penetrable scatterers," J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1383-1398, 1994.
doi:10.1364/JOSAA.11.001383        Google Scholar

22. Kouyoumjian, R. G. and P. H. Pathak, "A uniform geometrical theory of diffraction for an edge in a perfectly-conducting surface," Proc. IEEE, Vol. 62, No. 11, 1448-1461, 1974.
doi:10.1109/PROC.1974.9651        Google Scholar

23. Menendez, R. C. and S. W. Lee, "On the role of the geometrical optics field in aperture diffraction," IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propag., Vol. 25, No. 5, 688-695, 1977.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1977.1141651        Google Scholar