2020-09-29
Extensive Comparison Results of Coverage Map of Optimum Base Station Location of Digital Terrain with UTD Based Model
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 97, 69-76, 2020
Abstract
In order to provide high quality of service broadcasting systems, predicting the electric field strength in all the receiving points and generating the coverage map of the transmitter are svery important. Uniform Theory of Diffraction (UTD) based ray theoretical models could be used to predict the electric field and generate the coverage map in a short time. In order to eliminate the non-successive obstacles in the scenario and to reduce the computation time of UTD Model, Convex Hull (CH) technique is used for the first time. After this point, this model is named as Uniform Theory of Diffraction with Convex hull (UTD-CH) Model. Moreover, how operating frequency, obstacle height and the distance between the obstacles affect the coverage map of optimum base station location are researched by using UTD based models. In this study, UTD, Slope Uniform Theory of Diffraction (S-UTD), Slope Uniform Theory of Diffraction with Convex Hull (S-UTD-CH), and UTD-CH models are used for comparisons. Furthermore, computation times of UTD based models are compared.
Citation
Mehmet Baris Tabakcioglu, "Extensive Comparison Results of Coverage Map of Optimum Base Station Location of Digital Terrain with UTD Based Model," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 97, 69-76, 2020.
doi:10.2528/PIERM20080405
References

1. Keller, J. B., "Geometrical theory of diffraction," J. Opt. Soc. Am., Vol. 52, 116-130, 1962.
doi:10.1364/JOSA.52.000116        Google Scholar

2. Raman, C. V., "Caustics formed by diffraction and the geometric theory of diffraction patterns," Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences — Section A, 307-317, 1959.
doi:10.1007/BF03052839        Google Scholar

3. Kathavate, Y. V., "Geometric theory of Fresnel diffraction patterns," Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences — Section A, Vol. 21, 77-87, 1945.        Google Scholar

4. Kumar, R., "Structure of boundary diffraction wave revisited," Appl. Phys. B, Vol. 90, 379-382, 2008.
doi:10.1007/s00340-007-2897-y        Google Scholar

5. Luebbers, R. J., "Finite conductivity uniform gtd versus knife edge diffraction in prediction of propagation path loss," IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propag., Vol. 32, No. 1, 70-76, 1984.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1984.1143189        Google Scholar

6. Schneider, M. and R. J. Luebbers, "A uniform double diffraction coefficient," APS International Symposium, Vol. 3, 1270-1273, 1989.        Google Scholar

7. Kouyoumjian, R. G. and P. H. Pathak, "A uniform geometrical theory of diffraction for an edge in a perfectly conducting surface," Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 62, No. 11, 1448-1461, 1974.
doi:10.1109/PROC.1974.9651        Google Scholar

8. Holm, P. D., "UTD-diffraction coefficients for higher order wedge diffracted fields," IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propag., Vol. 44, No. 6, 879-888, 1996.
doi:10.1109/8.509892        Google Scholar

9. Tzaras, C. and S. R. Saunders, "An improved heuristic UTD solution for multiple-edge transition zone diffraction," IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propag., Vol. 49, No. 12, 1678-1682, 2001.
doi:10.1109/8.982446        Google Scholar

10. Jakobus, U., A. G. Aguilar, G. Woelfle, J. Van Tander, M. Bingle, K. Longtin, and M. Vogel, "Recent advances of FEKO and WinProp," APS URSI Science Meeting, 409-410, 2018.        Google Scholar

11. Shick, M., U. Jakobus, M. Schoeman, M. Bingle, J. Van Tandor, W. Burger, and D. Ludick, "Extended solution methods in FEKO to solve actual antenna simulation problems: Accelerated MoM and windscreen antenna modelling," EUCAP, 3053-3055, 2011.        Google Scholar

12. Kandimalla, D. and A. De, "High frequency uniform asymptotic solution for diffraction by the edges of a curved plate," IEEE InCAP, 1-4, 2018.        Google Scholar

13. Andersen, J. B., "UTD multiple-edge transition zone diffraction," IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propag., Vol. 45, No. 7, 1093-1097, 1997.
doi:10.1109/8.596898        Google Scholar

14. Andersen, J. B., "Transition zone diffraction by multiple edges," IPMAP, Vol. 141, No. 5, 382-384, 1994.        Google Scholar

15. Rizk, K., R. Valenzuela, D. Chiznik, and F. Gardiol, "Application of the slope diffraction method for urban microwave propagation prediction," IEEE VTC, Vol. 2, 1150-1155, 1998.        Google Scholar

16. Kara, A., H. L. Bertoni, and E. Yazgan, "Limit and application range of the slope-diffraction method for wireless communications," IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propag., Vol. 51, No. 9, 2512-2514, 2003.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2003.816389        Google Scholar

17. Tabakcioglu, M. B. and A. Kara, "Comparison of improved slope uniform theory of diffraction with some geometrical optic and physical optic methods for multiple building diffractions," Electromagnetics, Vol. 29, No. 4, 303-320, 2009.
doi:10.1080/02726340902876951        Google Scholar

18. Tabakcioglu, M. B. and A. Kara, "Improvements on slope diffraction for multiple wedges," Electromagnetics, Vol. 30, No. 3, 285-296, 2010.
doi:10.1080/02726340903577541        Google Scholar

19. Tabakcioglu, M. B., "S-UTD-CH model in multiple diffractions," International Journal of Electronics, Vol. 103, No. 5, 765-774, 2016.        Google Scholar

20. Tabakcioglu, M. B., "A top-down approach to S-UTD-CH model," ACES Journal, Vol. 32, No. 7, 586-592, 2017.        Google Scholar

21. Mcnamara, D. A., C. Pistorius, and J. Malherbe, Introduction to the Uniform Geometrical Theory of Diffraction, Artec House, 1990.

22. Chung, H. K. and H. L. Bertoni, "Application of isolated diffraction edge (IDE) method for urban microwave path loss prediction," IEEE VTC, Vol. 1, 205-209, 2003.        Google Scholar

23. Tabakcioglu, M. B. and A. Cansiz, "Application of S-UTD-CH model into multiple diffraction scenarios," International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, 1-5, 2013.
doi:10.1155/2013/285304        Google Scholar