volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

For a conical log spiral antenna (CLSA), it is quite common to place the strip conductor conformally to the conical surface, and the antenna requires an extra impedance matching network. On the other hand, non-conformal orientation can solve the impedance matching issue, but fabrication is not as straightforward as conformal placement. This work considers the non-conformal placement of a strip conductor which facilitates self-matching while using smart additive manufacturing techniques for prototyping to ease the fabrication complexity. The impact of the additional dielectric support on the performance parameters of CLSA is investigated. Finally, the CLSA was prototyped using two different conductive elements (copper strip and conductive paint) on the 3D-printed support. Experimental and numerical results are shown to agree well for both copper strip and paint-based approaches. The self-matched CLSA provided a maximum impedance bandwidth of 128%, 3-dB axial ratio bandwidth (AR BW) of 63.56%, and gains of 10.32±1.94 dBi. The additive manufacturing techniques are shown to allow design flexibility and mitigate fabrication difficulties.

1. Hertel, Thorsten W. and Glenn S. Smith, "Analysis and design of two-arm conical spiral antennas," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 44, No. 1, 25-37, 2002. Google Scholar

2. Wei, Tang and Tang Xiong, "Minimized conical spiral antenna for GNSS," 2013 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communication and Computing (ICSPCC 2013), 1-4, 2013.

3. Ernest, Anthony J., Youssef Tawk, Joseph Costantine, and Christos G. Christodoulou, "A bottom fed deployable conical log spiral antenna design for CubeSat," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 63, No. 1, 41-47, 2015. Google Scholar

4. Costantine, Joseph, Youssef Tawk, Ignacio Maqueda, Maria Sakovsky, Gina Olson, Sergio Pellegrino, and Christos G. Christodoulou, "UHF deployable helical antennas for CubeSats," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 64, No. 9, 3752-3759, 2016. Google Scholar

5. Sureda, Miquel, Marco Sobrino, Oriol Millan, Andrea Aguilella, Arnau Solanellas, Marc Badia, Joan Francesc Munoz-Martin, Lara Fernandez, Joan A. Ruiz-De-Azua, and Adriano Camps, "Design and testing of a helix antenna deployment system for a 1U CubeSat," IEEE Access, Vol. 9, 66103-66114, 2021. Google Scholar

6. Liu, Xueli, Constantinos L. Zekios, and Stavros V. Georgakopoulos, "Analysis of a packable and tunable origami multi-radii helical antenna," IEEE Access, Vol. 7, 13003-13014, 2019. Google Scholar

7. Hussein, Khalid Fawzy Ahmed, "Conical linear spiral antenna for tracking, telemetry and command of low earth orbit satellites," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 29, 97-107, 2012. Google Scholar

8. Mei, J. N., D. W. Ding, and G. Wang, "Design of compact wideband circularly polarized conical helix," International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Applications, 139-141, 2015.

9. Saintsing, Christy D., Benjamin S. Cook, and Manos M. Tentzeris, "An origami inspired reconfigurable spiral antenna," 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol. 46377, Buffalo, NY, USA, 2014.

10. Huang, Jingjian, Hongyu Zhao, Yang Zhou, Weiwei Wu, and Nai-Chang Yuan, "Far-field symmetry analysis and improvement of the cavity backed planar spiral antenna," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 47, 11-18, 2014. Google Scholar

11. Tang, Xihui, Yejun He, and Botao Feng, "Design of a wideband circularly polarized strip-helical antenna with a parasitic patch," IEEE Access, Vol. 4, 7728-7735, 2016. Google Scholar

12. Tang, Xihui, Botao Feng, and Yunliang Long, "The analysis of a wideband strip-helical antenna with 1.1 turns," International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 2016, No. 1, 5950472.1-7, 2016. Google Scholar

13. Helena, Diogo, Amélia Ramos, Tiago Varum, and João Nuno Matos, "Antenna design using modern additive manufacturing technology: A review," IEEE Access, Vol. 8, 177064-177083, 2020. Google Scholar

14. Ghazali, Mohd Ifwat Mohd, Saranraj Karuppuswami, Amanpreet Kaur, and Premjeet Chahal, "3D printed high functional density packaging compatible out-of-plane antennas," Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 30, 100863, 2019. Google Scholar

15. Ghosh, Purno and Frances Harackiewicz, "3D printed low profile strip‐based helical antenna," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 127, 195-205, 2022.
doi:10.2528/PIERC22101506 Google Scholar

16. Ghosh, Purno and Frances J. Harackiewicz, "Three-dimensional-printed strip and paint-based semiellipsoidal helical antenna," Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, Vol. 65, No. 8, 2262-2266, 2023. Google Scholar

17. Ghosh, Purno and Frances Harackiewicz, "Analysis and fabrication of conductive strip and paint-based hemispherical helical antennas on 3D printed structure," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 135, 1-11, 2023.
doi:10.2528/PIERC23050206 Google Scholar

18. Ghosh, Purno, Liton Chandra Paul, and Tithi Rani, "Rapid construction of electrically small spherical and cylindrical antennas," E-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, Vol. 8, 100631, 2024. Google Scholar

19. Wong, Kin-Lu and Yi-Fang Lin, "Stripline-fed printed triangular monopole," Electronics Letters, Vol. 33, No. 17, 1428-1429, 1997. Google Scholar

20. Dyson, J., "The characteristics and design of the conical log-spiral antenna," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 13, No. 4, 488-499, 1965. Google Scholar

Dr. Purno Ghosh

Dr. Frances Harackiewicz

Mr. Liton Chandra Paul

Dr. Ashish Mahanta