Search search
Publication Date
to
Vol. 91
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 139 PIERM 138 PIERM 137 PIERM 136 PIERM 135 PIERM 134 PIERM 133 PIERM 132 PIERM 131 PIERM 130 PIERM 129 PIERM 128 PIERM 127 PIERM 126 PIERM 125 PIERM 124 PIERM 123 PIERM 122 PIERM 121 PIERM 120 PIERM 119 PIERM 118 PIERM 117 PIERM 116 PIERM 115 PIERM 114 PIERM 113 PIERM 112 PIERM 111 PIERM 110 PIERM 109 PIERM 108 PIERM 107 PIERM 106 PIERM 105 PIERM 104 PIERM 103 PIERM 102 PIERM 101 PIERM 100 PIERM 99 PIERM 98 PIERM 97 PIERM 96 PIERM 95 PIERM 94 PIERM 93 PIERM 92 PIERM 91 PIERM 90 PIERM 89 PIERM 88 PIERM 87 PIERM 86 PIERM 85 PIERM 84 PIERM 83 PIERM 82 PIERM 81 PIERM 80 PIERM 79 PIERM 78 PIERM 77 PIERM 76 PIERM 75 PIERM 74 PIERM 73 PIERM 72 PIERM 71 PIERM 70 PIERM 69 PIERM 68 PIERM 67 PIERM 66 PIERM 65 PIERM 64 PIERM 63 PIERM 62 PIERM 61 PIERM 60 PIERM 59 PIERM 58 PIERM 57 PIERM 56 PIERM 55 PIERM 54 PIERM 53 PIERM 52 PIERM 51 PIERM 50 PIERM 49 PIERM 48 PIERM 47 PIERM 46 PIERM 45 PIERM 44 PIERM 43 PIERM 42 PIERM 41 PIERM 40 PIERM 39 PIERM 38 PIERM 37 PIERM 36 PIERM 35 PIERM 34 PIERM 33 PIERM 32 PIERM 31 PIERM 30 PIERM 29 PIERM 28 PIERM 27 PIERM 26 PIERM 25 PIERM 24 PIERM 23 PIERM 22 PIERM 21 PIERM 20 PIERM 19 PIERM 18 PIERM 17 PIERM 16 PIERM 14 PIERM 13 PIERM 12 PIERM 11 PIERM 10 PIERM 9 PIERM 8 PIERM 7 PIERM 6 PIERM 5 PIERM 4 PIERM 3 PIERM 2 PIERM 1
All Journals
PIER PIER B PIER C PIER M PIER Letters PIER Photonics
2020-04-14
Fast Method of Calculating the Air-Cored Coil Impedance Using the Filamentary Coil Model
By
Grzegorz Tytko

    Dr. Grzegorz Tytko

    Institute of Electronics

    The Silesian University of Technology

    Poland

    Homepage

Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 91, 101-109, 2020
doi:10.2528/PIERM20021102 | Google Scholar

Abstract
This paper presents a method for calculating the air-cored coil impedance with the employment of a mathematical model of an ideal filamentary coil. The proposed algorithm enables assigning, in a very quick way, each cylindrical air-cored coil to the corresponding filamentary coil using only two equivalent parameters. The first of them is the radius of the coil, whereas the second one is the distance between the coil and the surface of the tested material. The changes both in the parameters of the system under consideration and in the tested material bring about the same change in the impedance of the air-cored coil and the corresponding filamentary coil. This property brings a lot of advantages, since it allows using simpler final formulas for the filamentary coil and performing the calculations in a much shorter time, while obtaining the same results as in the case of the air-cored coil. At the same time, the creation of the scale of the measuring instrument and its calibration becomes far simpler since it is based on only two equivalent parameters.
Download Full Article (1201) View Full Article volume
Citation
Grzegorz Tytko, "Fast Method of Calculating the Air-Cored Coil Impedance Using the Filamentary Coil Model," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 91, 101-109, 2020.
doi:10.2528/PIERM20021102
References

1. Wang, H., W. Li, and Z. Feng, "Noncontact thickness measurement of metal films using eddy-current sensors immune to distance variation," IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., Vol. 64, No. 9, 2557-2564, 2015.
doi:10.1109/TIM.2015.2406053        Google Scholar

2. Li, W., Y. Ye, K. Zhang, et al. "A thickness measurement system for metal films based on eddy-current method with phase detection," IEEE Trans. Indust. Electr., Vol. 64, No. 5, 3940-3949, 2017.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2017.2650861        Google Scholar

3. Wen, D., M. Fan, B. Cao, et al. "Adjusting LOI for enhancement of pulsed eddy current thickness measurement," IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., Vol. 69, No. 2, 521-527, 2020.
doi:10.1109/TIM.2019.2904331        Google Scholar

4. Desjardins, D., T. W. Krause, and L. Clapham, "Transient eddy current method for the characterization of magnetic permeability and conductivity," NDT&E Int., Vol. 80, 65-70, 2016.
doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.02.010        Google Scholar

5. Yu, Y., Y. Zou, M. Hosani, et al. "Conductivity invariance phenomenon of eddy current NDT: Investigation verification and application," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 53, No. 1, 6200207, 2017.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2016.2616328        Google Scholar

6. Lu, M., R. Huang, W. Yin, et al. "Measurement of permeability for ferrous metallic plates using a novel lift-off compensation technique on phase signature," IEEE Sens. J., Vol. 19, No. 17, 7440-7446, 2019.
doi:10.1109/JSEN.2019.2916431        Google Scholar

7. Kolyshkin, A., T. Kubarsepp, O. Martens, et al. "Determination of electrical conductivity of metal plates using planar spiral," Proceedings of the 13th WSEAS International Conference on Systems, 545-550, 2009.        Google Scholar

8. Yu, Y., D. Zhang, C. Lai, et al. "Quantitative approach for thickness and conductivity measurement of monolayer coating by dual-frequency eddy current technique," IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., Vol. 66, No. 7, 1874-1882, 2017.
doi:10.1109/TIM.2017.2669843        Google Scholar

9. Zhang, S., W. Wu, and J. Tang, "Magnetic field calculation of cylindrical exciting coil above conductive plates," Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI), 1471-1476, 2015.
doi:10.1109/ICEMI.2015.7494424        Google Scholar

10. Jiang, F. and S. Liu, "Calculation and analysis of an analytical model for magnetic field monitoring based on TREE in eddy current testing," ACES Journal, Vol. 33, No. 12, 1489-1497, 2018.        Google Scholar

11. Morabito, F. C. and M. Versaci, "A fuzzy neural approach to localizing holes in conducting plates," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 37, 3534-3537, 2001.
doi:10.1109/20.952655        Google Scholar

12. Angiulli, G. and M. Versaci, "Neuro-fuzzy network for the design of circular and triangular equilateral microstrip antennas," Int. J. Infrared Millim. Waves, Vol. 37, 1513-1520, 2002.
doi:10.1023/A:1020333704205        Google Scholar

13. Noroozi, A., R. P. R. Hasanzadeh, and M. Ravan, "A fuzzy learning approach for identification of arbitrary crack profiles using ACFM technique," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 49, 5016-5027, 2013.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2013.2254718        Google Scholar

14. Ahmed, N. A., M. A. Faraj, F. Samsuri, et al. "Challenges in improving the performance of eddy current testing: Review," Measurement and Control, Vol. 52, 46-64, 2019.        Google Scholar

15. Amineh, R. K., M. Ravan, S. H. H. Sadeghi, et al. "Removal of probe liftoff effects on crack detection and sizing in metals by the AC field measurement technique," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 44, 2066-2073, 2008.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2008.923393        Google Scholar

16. Dziczkowski, L., "Elimination of coil liftoff from eddy current measurements of conductivity," IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., Vol. 62, 3301-3307, 2013.
doi:10.1109/TIM.2013.2272842        Google Scholar

17. Lu, M., L. Yin, A. J. Peyton, et al. "A novel compensation algorithm for thickness measurement immune to lift-off variations using eddy current method," IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., Vol. 65, 2773-2779, 2016.
doi:10.1109/TIM.2016.2600918        Google Scholar

18. Jiang, C., K.-T. Chau, W. Han, and W. Liu, "Development of multilayer rectangular coils for multiple-receiver multiple-frequency wireless power transfer," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 163, 15-24, 2018.
doi:10.2528/PIER18060206        Google Scholar

19. Egorov, A. V., S. V. Kucheryavskiy, and V. V. Polyakov, "Resolution of effects in multi-frequency eddy current data for reliable diagnostics of conductive materials," Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Vol. 160, 8-12, 2017.
doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.11.007        Google Scholar

20. Dziczkowski, L. and A. Buchacz, "Modification of calibration method for conductometers," Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc — Maintenance and Reliability, Vol. 4, 35-40, 2011.        Google Scholar

21. Dziczkowski, L., "Enhancement of conductometer functions with the measurements of surface roughness," International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, Vol. 41, 237-249, 2013.
doi:10.3233/JAE-121608        Google Scholar

22. Tytko, G. and L. Dziczkowski, "Fast calculation of the filamentary coil impedance using the truncated region eigenfunction expansion method," ACES Journal, Vol. 33, 1461-1466, 2018.        Google Scholar

23. Theodoulidis, T. and E. Kriezis, "Series expansions in eddy current nondestructive evaluation models," J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol. 161, 343-347, 2005.
doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.07.048        Google Scholar

24. Koliskina, V. and A. Kolyshkin, "Sensitivity of air-core and planar spiral coil to variation of electrical conductivity of a conducting sample," Recent Research in Applied Mathematics and Informatics, Proceedings of the 16th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Mathematics and Informatics, 145-149, 2011.        Google Scholar

25. Theodoulidis, T. P. and E. E. Kriezis, Eddy Current Canonical Problems (With Applications to Nondestructive Evaluation), Tech Science Press, 2006.

26. Dodd, C. V., W. E. Deeds, and J. W. Luquire, "Integral solutions to some eddy current problems," Int. J. Nondestr. Test., Vol. 1, 29-90, 1969.        Google Scholar

27. Dodd, C. V. and W. E. Deeds, "Analytical solutions to eddy-current probe-coil problems," J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 39, 2829-2838, 1968.
doi:10.1063/1.1656680        Google Scholar

28. Theodoulidis, T. P., "Model of ferrite-cored probes for eddy current nondestructive evaluation," J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 93, 3071-3078, 2003.
doi:10.1063/1.1543634        Google Scholar

29. Gradshtein, I. S. and I. M. Ryzhik, Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products, Academic Press, 1980.

Download Full Article (1201) View Full Article volume


The EM Academy piers.org jpier.org Who's Who in EM
Copyright © 2022 The Electromagnetics Academy. All Rights Reserved.