Vol. 105
Latest Volume
All Volumes
2021-09-15
Evaluation of the Influence of a Field-Less Electrostatic Potential on Electron Beam Deflection as Predicted by Weber Electrodynamics
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 105, 1-8, 2021
Abstract
Assis predicted that based on Weber's electrodynamics, an alternative direct-action model formulated before Maxwell, a charge accelerating inside a sphere at constant electric potential, should have a measureable effective mass. Although initially some experiments appeared in the literature that indeed claimed such an effect, all recent studies found no evidence. All experiments so far used either discharges or electrons with non-constant accelerations that could mask the existence of Assis's prediction. We performed an experiment using a Perrin tube, which produces a beam of electrons with a constant velocity that can be deflected by Helmholtz coils to hit a Faraday cup. The tube assembly was put inside a spherical shell, which could be charged up to 20 kV. Any effective mass of the electrons would have changed their position on the Faraday cup. We found no variation of the electron position within our experimental accuracy, which rules out Assis's effect by two orders of magnitude. This confirms Maxwell's theory and the fact that electrostatic potential energy cannot be localized to individual charges.
Citation
Martin Tajmar, and Marcel Weikert, "Evaluation of the Influence of a Field-Less Electrostatic Potential on Electron Beam Deflection as Predicted by Weber Electrodynamics," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 105, 1-8, 2021.
doi:10.2528/PIERM21071904
References

1. Boyer, T. H., "Electrostatic potential energy leading to an inertial mass change for a system of two point charges," American Journal of Physics, Vol. 46, 383-385, Apr. 1978, doi: 10.1119/1.11328.
doi:10.1119/1.11328

2. Boyer, T. H., "Energy and momentum in electromagnetic field for charged particles moving with constant velocities," American Journal of Physics, Vol. 39, 257-270, 1971, doi: 10.1119/1.1986119.
doi:10.1119/1.1986119

3. Page, L. and N. I. Adams, "Action and reaction between moving charges," American Journal of Physics, Vol. 13, 141-147, 1945, doi: 10.1119/1.1990689.
doi:10.1119/1.1990689

4. Pinto, F., "Resolution of a paradox in classical electrodynamics," Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, Vol. 73, 1-8, 2006, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.104020.

5. Steane, A. M., "Nonexistence of the self-accelerating dipole and related questions," Physical Review D, Vol. 89, 125006, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.125006.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.125006

6. Cavalleri, G. and G. Spinelli, "Inertial mass and potential energy," Lettere Al Nuovo Cimento Series 2, Vol. 18, 265-266, Feb. 1977, doi: 10.1007/BF02783441.
doi:10.1007/BF02783441

7. Assis, A. K. T., "Changing the inertial mass of a charged particle," Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, Vol. 62, 1418-1422, May 1993, doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.62.1418.
doi:10.1143/JPSJ.62.1418

8. Assis, A. K. T., Weber's Electrodynamics, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1994, doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-3670-1.
doi:10.1007/978-94-017-3670-1

9. Sapozhnikov, V. B., "On the effective mass of an electron surrounded by a charged shell," Il Nuovo Cimento B, Vol. 108, 481-490, 1993.
doi:10.1007/BF02742806

10. Özer, M., "Electrostatic time dilation and redshift," Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics, Vol. 802, 135212, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135212.

11. Tajmar, M. and A. K. T. Assis, "Particles with negative mass: Production, properties and applications for nuclear fusion and self-acceleration," Journal of Advanced Physics, Vol. 4, 77-82, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1166/jap.2015.1159.
doi:10.1166/jap.2015.1159

12. Assis, A. K. T., "Circuit theory in weber electrodynamics," European Journal of Physics, Vol. 18, 241-246, May 1997, doi: 10.1088/0143-0807/18/3/020.
doi:10.1088/0143-0807/18/3/020

13. Smith, R. T., F. P. M. Jjunju, and S. Maher, "Evaluation of electron beam deflections across a solenoid using Weber-Ritz and Maxwell-Lorentz electrodynamics," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 151, 83-93, 2015.
doi:10.2528/PIER15021106

14. Smith, R. T. and S. Maher, "Investigating electron beam deflections by a long straight wire carrying a constant current using direct action, emission-based and field theory approaches of electrodynamics," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 75, 79-89, 2017.
doi:10.2528/PIERB17021103

15. Baumgärtel, C., R. T. Smith, and S. Maher, "Accurately predicting electron beam deflections in fringing fields of a solenoid," Scientific Reports, Vol. 10, 1-13, 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67596-0.
doi:10.1038/s41598-020-67596-0

16. Mikhailov, V. F., "The action of an electrostatic potential on the electron mass," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Vol. 24, 161-169, 1999.

17. Mikhailov, V. F., "Influence of a field-less electrostatic potential on the inertial electron mass," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Vol. 28, 231-236, 2003.

18. Junginger, J. E. and Z. D. Popovic, "An experimental investigation of the influence of an electrostatic potential on electron mass as predicted by Weber's Force law," Canadian Journal of Physics, Vol. 82, 731-735, 2004, doi: 10.1139/p04-046.
doi:10.1139/p04-046

19. Little, S., H. Puthoff, and M. Ibison, "Investigation of Weber's electrodynamics,", available: https://pdfhall.com/investigation-of-webers-electrodynamics-exvacuo_5b744a91097c471a4a8b45e0.html, 2001.

20. Lörincz, I. and M. Tajmar, "Experimental investigation of the influence of spatially distributed charges on the inertial mass of moving electrons as predicted by Weber's electrodynamics," Canadian Journal of Physics, Vol. 7, cjp-2017-0034, May 2017, doi: 10.1139/cjp-2017-0034.

21. Mikhailov, V. F., "Influence of an electrostatic potential on the inertial electron mass," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Vol. 26, 633-638, 2001.

22. Weikert, M. and M. Tajmar, "Investigation of the influence of a field-free electrostatic potential on the electron mass with Barkhausen-Kurz oscillation," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Vol. 44, 23-37, 2019.

23. Yatsenko, V. A., "On the effect of the charged shell on the mass of the electron," J. Samara State Tech. Univ., Ser. Phys. Math. Sci., Vol. 38, 178-179, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.14498/vsgtu401.

24. 3B Scientific "Perrin Tube D 1000650,", available: https://www.3bscientific.de/product-manual/1000650_EN.pdf.

25. Phipps, T. E., "Toward modernization of Weber's force law," Physics Essays, Vol. 3, 414-420, Dec. 1990, doi: 10.4006/1.3033457.
doi:10.4006/1.3033457

26. Caluzi, J. J. and A. K. T. Assis, "An analysis of Phipps's potential energy," Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 332, 747-753, 1995, doi: 10.1016/0016-0032(95)00071-2.
doi:10.1016/0016-0032(95)00071-2

27. Wesley, J. P., "Weber electrodynamics: Part III. Mechanics, gravitation," Foundations of Physics Letters, Vol. 3, 581-605, Dec. 1990, doi: 10.1007/BF00666027.
doi:10.1007/BF00666027

28. Schrödinger, E., "The possibility of fulfillment of the relativity requirement in classical mechanics," Annalen der Physik, Vol. 77, 325-336, 1925.
doi:10.1002/andp.19253821109