Vol. 107
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 137 [2026] PIERM 136 [2025] PIERM 135 [2025] PIERM 134 [2025] PIERM 133 [2025] PIERM 132 [2025] PIERM 131 [2025] PIERM 130 [2024] PIERM 129 [2024] PIERM 128 [2024] PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2022-02-04
Optimizing Turn-on Angle and External Rotor Pole Shape to Suppress Torque Ripple of a Novel Switched Reluctance Motor
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 107, 243-257, 2022
Abstract
The large vibration and noise of switched reluctance motor (SRM) limits development in the field of electric bicycles. The innovation of the paper lies in reducing torque ripple by advancing the turn-on angle and increasing air-gap permeability in the first half of two phase exchange region. The torque ripple of a novel Multi-Teeth External Rotor SRM (MTER-SRM) is studied in the paper. Firstly, the topology structure, working principle and optimized process of the MTER-SRM are introduced. Secondly, the method to suppress the torque ripple by advancing turn-on angle is proved theoretically. The effect of advancing turn-on angle on torque ripple is analyzed, and turn-on angle is optimized by Finite Element Method (FEM). Thirdly, the mathematical model is built to analyze the change of air-gap permeability in the aligned and unaligned position. The effect of different angles and heights of pole shoe on the torque characteristics is analyzed by FEM, and optimized parameters of single pole shoe size are obtained. Finally, the results show that torque ripple has dropped from 1.5 to 0.4, with the decrease of 73.3%. The multi-physical field results show that the vibration displacement, velocity, acceleration and noise pressure of stator decrease by 83.3%, 52.5%, 52.2%, and 54.2%, respectively. Meanwhile, the vibration test of the prototype also shows that the maximum vibration acceleration has dropped from 0.4 to 0.1, with the decrease of 75%. The vibration and noise of the MTER-SRM is decreased significantly by this method, which can provide a demonstration for developing high performance motor applied in electric bicycle.
Citation
Chaozhi Huang, Jinfeng Duan, Wei Liu, and Yuliang Wu, "Optimizing Turn-on Angle and External Rotor Pole Shape to Suppress Torque Ripple of a Novel Switched Reluctance Motor," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 107, 243-257, 2022.
doi:10.2528/PIERM21103001
References

1. Zhu, Z. Q., X. Liu, and Z. Pan, "Analytical model for predicting maximum reduction levels of vibration and noise in switched reluctance machine by active vibration cancellation," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 26, No. 1, 36-45, 2011.
doi:10.1109/TEC.2010.2087336        Google Scholar

2. Gan, C., J. Wu, Q. Sun, W. Kong, H. Li, and Y. Hu, "A review on machine topologies and control techniques for low-noise switched reluctance motors in electric vehicle applications," IEEE Access, Vol. 6, 31430-31443, 2018.
doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2837111        Google Scholar

3. Takiguchi, M., H. Sugimoto, N. Kurihara, and A. Chiba, "Acoustic noise and vibration reduction of SRM by elimination of third harmonic component in sum of radial forces," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 30, No. 3, 883-891, 2015.
doi:10.1109/TEC.2015.2401398        Google Scholar

4. Qing, L. W. H. M. and X. L. Ge, "A high efficiency torque ripple suppression method for switched reluctance motor," Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, Vol. 35, No. 9, 1912-1920, 2020.        Google Scholar

5. Andrada, P., B. Blanqué, E. Martínez, and M. Torrent, "A novel type of hybrid reluctance motor drive," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 61, No. 8, 4337-4345, 2014.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2013.2279384        Google Scholar

6. Jeong, K. I. X. Z. and D. H. Lee, "Performance comparison of conventional and segmental rotor type switched reluctance motor," Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1138-1146, 2018.        Google Scholar

7. Mousavi-Aghdam, S. R., M. R. Feyzi, and Y. Ebrahimi, "A new switched reluctance motor design to reduce torque ripple using finite element fuzzy optimization," Iranian Journal of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 1, 91-96, 2012.        Google Scholar

8. Gundogmus, O., M. Elamin, Y. Yasa, T. Husain, Y. Sozer, J. Kutz, J. Tylenda, and R. L. Wright, "Acoustic noise mitigation of switched reluctance machines with windows on stator and rotor pole shoes," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 56, No. 4, 3719-3730, 2020.        Google Scholar

9. Lee, D., T. H. Pham, and J. Ahn, "Design and operation characteristics of four-two pole shoe high-speed SRM for torque ripple reduction," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 60, No. 9, 3637-3643, 2013.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2012.2208432        Google Scholar

10. Jiang, J. W., B. Bilgin, and A. Emadi, "Three-phase 24/16 switched reluctance machine for a hybrid electric powertrain," IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electri cation, Vol. 3, No. 1, 76-85, 2017.
doi:10.1109/TTE.2017.2664778        Google Scholar

11. Huang, C. Z. S. W. F. and G. X. Guo, "Optimization of stator pole shoe shape based on torque ripple and radial force," Electric Machines and Control, Vol. 24, No. 6, 98-106, 2020.        Google Scholar

12. Lee, J. H., "Optimum shape design solution of flux switching motor using response surface methodology and new type winding," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 48, No. 4, 1637-1640, 2012.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2011.2173564        Google Scholar

13. Yang, H., Y. Lim, and H. Kim, "Acoustic noise/vibration reduction of a single-phase SRM using skewed stator and rotor," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 60, No. 10, 4292-4300, 2013.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2012.2217715        Google Scholar

14. Nabeta, S. I., I. E. Chabu, L. Lebensztajn, D. A. P. Correa, W. M. D. Silva, and K. Hameyer, "Mitigation of the torque ripple of a switched reluctance motor through a multiobjective optimization," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 44, No. 6, 1018-1021, 2008.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2007.915137        Google Scholar

15. Guo, X., R. Zhong, M. Zhang, D. Ding, and W. Sun, "Resonance reduction by optimal switch angle selection in switched reluctance motor," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 67, No. 3, 1867-1877, 2020.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2019.2902833        Google Scholar

16. Li, G., J. Ojeda, S. Hlioui, E. Hoang, M. Lecrivain, and M. Gabsi, "Modification in rotor pole shoe geometry of mutually coupled switched reluctance machine for torque ripple mitigating," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 48, No. 6, 2025-2034, 2012.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2011.2179307        Google Scholar

17. Lee, J. W., H. S. Kim, B. I. Kwon, and B. T. Kim, "New rotor shape design for minimum torque ripple of SRM using FEM," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 40, No. 2, 754-757, 2004.
doi:10.1109/TMAG.2004.824803        Google Scholar

18. Zhang, X., X. Wang, and Y. Yang, "The computation of vibration reduction capacity for switched reluctance motor based on improved magnetic field partition method," Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, Vol. 30, No. 22, 9-18, 2015.        Google Scholar

19. Zhang, X., X. Wang, Y. Yang, and B. Wei, "Vibration reduction of a switched reluctance motor using new rotor tooth with slot on each side," Proceedings of the CSEE, Vol. 35, No. 6, 1508-1515, 2015.        Google Scholar

20. Lin, F. and S. Yang, "An approach to producing controlled radial force in a switched reluctance motor," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2137-2146, 2007.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2007.895129        Google Scholar

21. Mousavi-Aghdam, S. R., M. R. Feyzi, N. Bianchi, and M. Morandin, "Design and analysis of a novel high-torque stator-segmented SRM," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 63, No. 3, 1458-1466, 2016.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2015.2494531        Google Scholar