Vol. 104

Front:[PDF file] Back:[PDF file]
Latest Volume
All Volumes
All Issues
2021-09-17

Focalized Brain Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with the Utilization of a Field Shaper and a Crescent Ferromagnetic Core

By Xiao Fang, Wei Liu, Yaoyao Luo, Chang Liu, and Zhou He
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 104, 185-197, 2021
doi:10.2528/PIERM21061808

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been widely used in the treatment of varied physical and neuropsychiatric disorders, especially in major depression. The intracranial electromagnetic field is generated by the the time-varying current in the stimulation coil to change the potential of targeted neurons during the treatment. Since different mental disorders correspond to specific stimulation targets and broad stimulation range might raise serious side effects, stimulation focalization is very important in TMS. To achieve focalized stimulation, a novel magnetic stimulation coil with the field shaper and the crescent ferromagnetic core (the FSMC coil) is proposed and optimized in this study. The Finite-Element Method (FEM) is adopted to analyze the relationships between the design parameters of the field shaper and crescent ferromagnetic core and the characteristics of the intracranial electromagnetic field. Compared to traditional single circular coil, the focalization of the intracranial electromagnetic field generated by the optimized FSMC coil can be significantly improved both from 2D and 3D levels. To verify our method, an anatomically realistic human head model with different electrical properties assigned to each tissue of the brain is employed in this paper. We also checked the maximum induced charge density on the targeted plane generated by the optimized coil to make sure that it will not cause any induced neurologic damage.

Citation


Xiao Fang, Wei Liu, Yaoyao Luo, Chang Liu, and Zhou He, "Focalized Brain Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with the Utilization of a Field Shaper and a Crescent Ferromagnetic Core," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 104, 185-197, 2021.
doi:10.2528/PIERM21061808
http://www.jpier.org/PIERM/pier.php?paper=21061808

References


    1. Hand, B. J., et al., "TMS coil orientation and muscle activation influence lower limb intracortical excitability," Brain Research, Vol. 1746, 147027, 2020.
    doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2020.147027

    2. Sanchez, C. C., et al., "Design of TMS coils with reduced Lorentz forces: Application to concurrent TMS-fMRI," Journal of Neural Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 1, 016056.1-016056.11, 2020.

    3. Peterchev, A. V., et al., "Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: Definition, selection, and reporting practices," Brain Stimulation, Vol. 5, No. 4, 435-453, 2012.
    doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.10.001

    4. Yi, G., et al., "Dynamic analysis of Hodgkin's three classes of neurons exposed to extremely low-frequency sinusoidal induced E-field," Applied Mathematics & Computation, Vol. 231, 100-110, 2014.
    doi:10.1016/j.amc.2013.12.181

    5. Dou, Z. and J. Liao, "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Technique Foundamental Theory and Clinical Practice," People's Health Publishing House, 2012.

    6. Chail, A., et al., "Transcranial magnetic stimulation: A review of its evolution and current applications," Industrial Psychiatry Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2018.

    7. Gordon, S. R., et al., "Evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for the treatment of chronic postoperative pain following lumbar surgery: A pilot, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial," Journal of Pain Research, Vol. 11, 1209, 2018.

    8. Tang, A., et al., "Low intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation drives structural synaptic plasticity in the young and aged motor cortex,", 2021.

    9. Huang, H., "Magnetic stimulation of neurons and study of membrane structures,", State University of New York at Buffalo, 2013.

    10. Pfeiffer, F. and A. Benali, "Could non-invasive brain-stimulation prevent neuronal degeneration upon ion channel re-distribution and ion accumulation after demyelination?," Neural Regeneration Research, Vol. 15, No. 11, 1977-1980, 2020.
    doi:10.4103/1673-5374.282234

    11. Kato, T., et al., "Electromagnetic characteristics of eccentric figure-eight coils for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A numerical study," Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 111, No. 7, Pt. 2, 22-1988, 2012.

    12. Meng, Y., et al., "Deep brain transcranial magnetic stimulation using variable ``Halo coil'' system," Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 117, No. 17, 1106-128, 2015.
    doi:10.1063/1.4913937

    13. Guadagnin, V., et al., "Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation: Modeling of different coil configurations," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 63, No. 7, 1543-1550, 2016.
    doi:10.1109/TBME.2015.2498646

    14. Lu, M. and S. Ueno, "Calculating the E-field in real human head by transcranial magnetic stimulation with shield plate," Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 105, No. 7, 527, 2009.
    doi:10.1063/1.3093912

    15. Barker, A. T., R. I. Jalinous, and I. L. Freeston, "Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex," Lancet, Vol. 325, No. 8437, 1106-1107, 1985.
    doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92413-4

    16. Yang, S., et al., "Circular coil array model for transcranial magnetic stimulation," IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 20, 829-833, 2010.
    doi:10.1109/TASC.2010.2040379

    17. Hsu, K.-H. and D. M. Durand, "A 3-D differential coil design for localized magnetic stimulation," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 48, No. 10, 1162-1168, 2001.
    doi:10.1109/10.951519

    18. Kim, D. H., G. E. Georghiou, and C. Won, "Improved field localization in transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain with the utilization of a conductive shield plate in the stimulator," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 53, No. 4, 720-725, 2006.
    doi:10.1109/TBME.2006.870244

    19. Xiong, H., J. H. Shi, X.-W. Hu, and J.-Z. Liu, "The focusing optimization of transcranial magnetic stimulation system," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 48, 145-154, 2016.
    doi:10.2528/PIERM16040509

    20. Sorkhabi, M. M., K. Wendt, and T. Denison, "Temporally interfering TMS: Focal and dynamic stimulation location," 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) in Conjunction with the 43rd Annual Conference of the Canadian Medical and Biological Engineering Society, IEEE, 2020.

    21. Lindl, A., et al., "A 3-axis coil design for multichannel TMS arrays," Neuro Image, 224, 2020.

    22. Lee, E. G., et al., "Investigational effect of brain-scalp distance on the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in depression," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 52, No. 7, 1-4, 2016.

    23. Chiu, T.-J., et al., "Osteopontin expression is associated with the poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy," BioMed Research International, Vol. 2018, 1-9, 2018.

    24. Deng, Z. D., S. H. Lisanby, and A. V. Peterchev, "E-field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: Simulation comparison of 50 coil designs," Brain Stimulation, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1-13, 2013.
    doi:10.1016/j.brs.2012.02.005

    25. Roth, B. J., et al., "The heating of metal electrodes during rapid-rate magnetic stimulation: A possible safety hazard," Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 85, No. 2, 116-123, 1992.
    doi:10.1016/0168-5597(92)90077-O

    26. Liu, C., et al., "Optimal design of transcranial magnetic stimulation thin core coil with trade-off between stimulation effect and heat energy," IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2020.

    27. Saxby, P., et al., "A water-cooled transcranial magnetic stimulation coil," Brain Stimulation, 2008.