To accurately model nanophotonic structures, a conformal dispersive finite difference time domain (FDTD) method based on an effective permittivity technique is presented, which can describe exactly the behaviors of evanescent waves in the vicinity of curved interface. A mismatch between the numerical permittivity and the analytical value introduced by the discretization in FDTD is demonstrated, thus, very fine time-step size is always necessary for nanostructures modelling, which greatly increases the required overheads of CPU time as compared to usual FDTD simulations. To resolve this problem, the performance of parallel FDTD code is investigated on a Gigabit Ethernet, and the acceleration technique for parallel FDTD algorithm is presented, which is developed by means of the replicating computation based on overlapping grids, the OpenMP multithreading technique and the vectorization based on SSE instruction. The comparison of relevant numerical results shows that these methods are able to reduce the expense of the system communications and enhance the utilization ratio of the CPU effectively, which improves greatly the performance of parallel FDTD with high time-consuming.
1. Andrew, T. L., H.-Y. Tsai, and R. Menon, "Confining light to deep subwavelength dimensions to enable optical nanopatterning," Science, Vol. 324, 917-921, 2009. doi:10.1126/science.1167704
2. Suyama, T. and Y. Okuno, "Surface plasmon resonance absorption in a multilayered thin-film grating," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 23, No. 13, 1773-1783, 2009. doi:10.1163/156939309789566914
3. Politano, A., et al., "Electronic properties of self-assembled quantum dots of sodium on Cu(111) and their interaction with water," Surface Science, Vol. 601, 2656-2659, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.susc.2006.11.079
4. Politano, A., et al., "High resolution electron energy loss measurements of Na/Cu(111) and H2O/Na/Cu(111): Dependence of water reactivity as a function of Na coverage," The Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 126, 244712, 2007.
5. Draine, B. T. and P. J. Flatau, "Discrete-dipole approximation for periodic targets: theory and tests," Journal of Optical Society of America A, Vol. 25, No. 11, 2693-2703, 2008. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.25.002693
6. Jiao, D. and J. M. Jin, "Time-domain finite-element modeling of dispersive media," IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, Vol. 11, No. 5, 220-222, 2001. doi:10.1109/7260.923034
7. Liu, Y., Z. Liang, and Z. Yang, "Computation of electromagnetic dosimetry for human body using parallel FDTD algorithm com- bined with interpolation technique," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 82, 95-107, 2008. doi:10.2528/PIER08021603
8. Garcia, S. G., F. Costen, M. Fernandez Pantoja, L. D. Angulo, and J. Alvarez, "Effcient excitation of waveguides in Crank-Nicolson FDTD," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 17, 27-38, 2010. doi:10.2528/PIERL10072008
9. Zhang, Y.-Q. and D.-B. Ge, "A unified FDTD approach for electromagnetic analysis of dispersive objects," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 96, 155-172, 2009. doi:10.2528/PIER09072603
10. Mohammadi, A. and M. Agio, "Dispersive contour-path finite-difference time-domain algorithm for modelling surface plasmon polaritons at flat interfaces," Optics Express, Vol. 14, No. 23, 11330-11338, 2006. doi:10.1364/OE.14.011330
11. Wang, A.-Q., L.-X. Guo, and C. Chai, "Numerical simulations of electromagnetic scattering from 2D rough surface: Geometric modeling by nurbs surface," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 24, No. 10, 1315-1328, 2010. doi:10.1163/156939310791958662
12. Wei, B., S.-Q. Zhang, Y.-H. Dong, and F. Wang, "A general FDTD algorithm handling thin dispersive layer," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 18, 243-257, 2009. doi:10.2528/PIERB09090306
13. Hirono, T., ni, and T. Yamanaka., "Effective permittivities with exact second-order accuracy at inclined dielectric interface for the two-dimensional finite-difference time-domain method," Applied Optics, Vol. 49, No. 7, 1080-1096, 2010. doi:10.1364/AO.49.001080
14. Hwang, K.-P. and A. C. Cangellaris, "Effective permittivities for second-order accurate FDTD equations at dielectric interfaces," IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, Vol. 11, No. 4, 158-160, 2001. doi:10.1109/7260.916329
15. Mohammadi, A., H. Nadgaran, and M. Agio, "Contour-path effective permittivities for the two-dimensional finite-difference time-domain method," Optics Express, Vol. 13, No. 25, 10367-10381, 2005. doi:10.1364/OPEX.13.010367
16. Taflove, A. and S. C. Hagness, Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method, 3nd Edition, Artech House, Norwood, MA, 2005.
17. Zhao, Y., P. Belov, and Y. Hao, "Accurate modelling of left-handed metamaterials using a finite-difference time-domain method with spatial averaging at the boundaries," Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics, Vol. 9, S468-S475, 2007. doi:10.1088/1464-4258/9/9/S31
18. Chen, J. J., T. M. Grzegorczyk, B.-I. Wu, and J. A. Kong, "Limitation of FDTD in simulation of a perfect lens imaging system," Optics Express, Vol. 13, No. 26, 10840-10845, 2005. doi:10.1364/OPEX.13.010840
19. Liu, Y., Z. Liang, and Z. Q. Yang, "A novel FDTD approach featuring two-level parallelization on PC cluster," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 80, 393-408, 2008. doi:10.2528/PIER07120703
20. Teixeira, F. L., "Time-domain finite-difference and finite-element methods for Maxwell equations in complex media," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 56, No. 8, 2150-2166, 2008. doi:10.1109/TAP.2008.926767
21. Brongersma, M. L., J. W. Hartman, and H. A. Atwater, "Electromagnetic energy transfer and switching in nanoparticle chain arrays below the diffraction limit," Physical Review B, Vol. 62, No. 24, R16356-R16359, 2000. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.62.R16356
22. Bik, A., M. Girkar, P. Grey and X.-M. Tian, "Effcient exploitation of parallelism on Pentium III and Pentium 4 processor-based systems," Intel Technology Journal, Q1, 1-9, 2001.