volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

An alternative to the traditional method of sampling radar cross section data from measurements or electromagnetic code is presented and evaluated. The Cubed Sphere sampling scheme solves the problem of oversampling at high and low elevation angles and at equal equatorial resolution the scheme can reduce the number of samples required by approximately 25%. The analysis is made of an aircraft model with a monostatic radar cross section at C-band and a bistatic radar cross section at VHF-band, using Physical Optics and the Multilevel Fast Multipole Method, respectively. It was found that for the monostatic radar cross section, the Cubed Sphere sampling scheme required approximately 12% fewer samples compared to that required for traditional sampling while maintaining the same interpolation accuracy over the entire domain. For the bistatic data, it was possible to reduce the number of samples by approximately 35% for high sampling resolutions. Using spline interpolation the number of samples required could be reduced even further.

1. Sinclair, G., "Early history of the OSU ElectroScience Laboratory," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 33, No. 2, 137-143, Feb. 1985, DOI: 10.1109/TAP.1985.1143545.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1985.1143545 Google Scholar

2. Dybdal, R. B., "Radar cross section measurements," Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 75, No. 4, 498-516, Apr. 1987.
doi:10.1109/PROC.1987.13757 Google Scholar

3. Lynch, D., Introduction to RF STEALTH, Vol. 17, SciTECH Publishing, 2005.

4. Olin, I. D. and F. D. Queen, "Dynamic measurement of radar cross sections," Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 53, No. 8, 954-961, Aug. 1965.
doi:10.1109/PROC.1965.4074 Google Scholar

5. Hitzel, S. M., "Aerodynamics and radar signature - A combination of theoretical methods," AIAA Journal, Vol. 25, No. 5, 399-404, 1988. Google Scholar

6. Pitkethly, M. J., "Radar absorbing materials and their potential use in aircraft structures," IEE Colloquium on Low Profile Absorbers and Scatterers, London, 1992. Google Scholar

7. Gürel, L., H. Bağcı, J. C. Castelli, A. Cheraly, and F. Tardivel, "Validation through comparison: Measurement and calculation of the bistatic radar cross section of a stealth target," Radio Science, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2003.
doi:10.1029/2001RS002583 Google Scholar

8. Bucci, O. M., C. Gennarelli, G. Riccio, and C. Savarese, "Electromagnetic fields interpolation from nonuniform samples over spherical and cylindrical surfaces," IEEE Proceedings Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 141, No. 2, 77-84, 1994, DOI: 10.1049/ip-map:19949838.
doi:10.1049/ip-map:19949838 Google Scholar

9. Persson, B. and M. Norsell, "On modeling RCS of aircraft for flight simulation," IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol. 56, No. 4, 34-43, Aug. 2014, DOI: 10.1109/MAP.2014.6931656.
doi:10.1109/MAP.2014.6931656 Google Scholar

10. Yang, J. and K. T. Sarkar, "Interpolation/Extrapolation of Radar Cross-Section (RCS) data in the frequency domain using the cauchy method," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 55, 2844-2851, Oct. 2007. Google Scholar

11. Davis, M. E., "Space based radar moving target detection challenges," RADAR, 143-147, 2002. Google Scholar

12. Manasse, R., "Idealized radar GMTI detection with space-time processing," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 45, No. 4, 1610-1618, Oct. 2009, DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2009.5310322.
doi:10.1109/TAES.2009.5310322 Google Scholar

13. Li, J., G. Liu, N. Jiang, and P. Stoica, "Moving target feature extraction for airborne high-range resolution phased-array radar," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 49, No. 2, 277-289, Feb. 2001, DOI: 10.1109/78.902110.
doi:10.1109/78.902110 Google Scholar

14. Wang, Y. L., Z. Bao, and Y. N. Peng, "STAP with medium PRF mode for non-side-looking airborne radar," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 36, No. 2, 609-620, Apr. 2000, DOI: 10.1109/7.845249.
doi:10.1109/7.845249 Google Scholar

15. Ulander, L., P. Förlind, P. Grahn, and A. Gustavsson, "Bistatisk och passiv radar,", FOI, Stockholm, 2014. Google Scholar

16. Amanipour, V. and A. Olfat, "CFAR detection for multistatic radar," Signal Processing, Vol. 91, No. 1, 28-37, Jan. 2011, DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2010.06.003.
doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2010.06.003 Google Scholar

17. Willis, N. J. and G. Griffiths, Advances in Bistatic Radar, 91-104, SciTech Publishing, 2007.

18. Ronchi, C., R. Iacono, and P. S. Paolucci, "The `cubed sphere': A new method for the solution of partial differential equations in spherical geometry," Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 124, No. 1, 93-114, Mar. 1996, DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1996.0047.
doi:10.1006/jcph.1996.0047 Google Scholar

19. Hiroyuki, A. and I. Nozomu, "Sampling points reduction in spherical scanned TRP," IEEE Conference on Antenna Measurements & Applications, 1-4, 2014. Google Scholar

20. Cornelius, R. and D. Heberling, "Analysis of sampling grids for spherical near-field antenna measurements," PIERS Proceedings, 923-927, Prague, Jul. 6-9, 2015. Google Scholar

21. Giordanengo, G., M. Righero, F. Vipiana, G. Vecchi, and M. Sabbadini, "Fast antenna testing with reduced near field sampling," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 62, No. 5, 2501-2513, May 2014, DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2014.2309338.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2014.2309338 Google Scholar

22. Jenn, D. C., "POFACETS 4.1,", 2013, [Online], Available: http://faculty.nps.edu/jenn. Google Scholar

23. Van den Bosch, I., "Puma-EM 5.8,", 2014, [Online], Available: http://sourceforge.net/projects/puma-em/.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2014.2309338 Google Scholar

24. Shaeffer, J. F., M. T. Tuley, and E. F. Knott, Radar Cross Section, 2nd Ed., 17, 44-45, Artech House Publishers, 1993.

25. De Boor, C., A Practical Guide to Splines, 291-296, Springer New York, 2001.
doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-6333-3_17

26. Marsaglia, G., "Choosing a point from the surface of a sphere," The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 43, No. 2, 645-646, 1972.
doi:10.1214/aoms/1177692644 Google Scholar

Dr. Bjorn Vilhelm Persson

Dr. Martin Norsell