Vol. 92
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 130 [2024] PIERM 129 [2024] PIERM 128 [2024] PIERM 127 [2024] PIERM 126 [2024] PIERM 125 [2024] PIERM 124 [2024] PIERM 123 [2024] PIERM 122 [2023] PIERM 121 [2023] PIERM 120 [2023] PIERM 119 [2023] PIERM 118 [2023] PIERM 117 [2023] PIERM 116 [2023] PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2020-05-06
A Novel Approach for Human Intention Recognition Based on Hall Effect Sensors and Permanent Magnets
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 92, 55-65, 2020
Abstract
Human intention recognition is important for any interaction between the user and the exoskeleton. This study proposes a novel approach, based on a contactless sensory system, using linear Hall effect sensors to recognize human intentions. This contactless sensory system consists of four Hall effect sensors mounted on the exoskeleton, whilst a ring-shaped permanent magnet with diametrical magnetization consisting of two semi-rings is worn on the user's forearm. The model of the magnetic field created by the permanent magnet is also developed. Based on the developed magnetic field model and by interpreting the signals from the Hall effect sensory system received while the user's elbow and forearm move, the intention identification algorithm is derived. A lightweight elbow and forearm assistive exoskeleton is developed. The proposed approach for human intention recognition is used to assist in controlling the exoskeleton, following the wearer's intended motions. By implementing this contactless sensory system, wearers can use the exoskeleton easily and can move their forearm comfortably, while the human intention motion is recognized and used to control the exoskeleton. Moreover, achieved signals are unaffected by skin perspiration and muscle fatigue. As the sensory system is mounted on the exoskeleton, there is only indirect contact between the user's body and the sensors, leading to improved comfort. Finally, the system does not require expert knowledge to place the sensors on the body of the user. This approach can be extended to detect human intentions for the control of exoskeletons with more degrees of freedom.
Citation
Van Tai Nguyen, Tien-Fu Lu, Paul Grimshaw, and William Robertson, "A Novel Approach for Human Intention Recognition Based on Hall Effect Sensors and Permanent Magnets," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 92, 55-65, 2020.
doi:10.2528/PIERM19112801
References

1. Rahman, M. H., C. O. Luna, M. Saad, and P. Archambault, "EMG based control of a robotic exoskeleton for shoulder and elbow motion assist," Jounal of Automation and Control Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 4, 270-276, 2015.

2. Kiguchi, K. and Y. Hayashi, "An EMG-based control for an upper-limb power-assist exoskeleton robot," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), Vol. 42, No. 4, 1064-1071, Aug. 2012.

3. Andreasen, D. S., S. K. Alien, and D. A. Backus, "Exoskeleton with EMG based active assistance for rehabilitation," Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005, ICORR 2005, 333-336, 2005.

4. Lenzi, T., S. M. M. De Rossi, N. Vitiello, and M. C. Carrozza, "Intention-based EMG control for powered exoskeletons," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 59, No. 8, 2180-2190, Aug. 2012.

5. Rahman, M. H., C. O. Luna, M. Saad, and P. Archambault, "Motion control of an exoskeleton robot using electromyogram signals," Proceedings of Advances in Robotics, Mechatronics and Circuits: 18th International Conference on Circuits (Part of CSCC'14), 2014 International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics, Structural Analysis (MEROSTA 2014), ISBN: 978-1-61804-242-2, 2014.

6. Kiguchi, K., T. Tanaka, and T. Fukuda, "Neuro-fuzzy control of a robotic exoskeleton with EMG signals," IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 12, No. 4, 481-490, Aug. 2004.

7. Tang, Z., K. Zhang, S. Sun, Z. Gao, L. Zhang, and Z. Yang, "An upper-limb power-assist exoskeleton using proportional myoelectric control," Sensors, Vol. 14, 6677-6694, 2014.

8. Irimia, D. C., M. S. Poboroniuc, F. Serea, A. Baciu, and R. Olaru, "Controlling a FESEXOSKELETON rehabilitation system by means of brain-computer interface," Proceedings of International Conference and Exposition on Electrical and Power Engineering (EPE), 352-355, Iasi, 2016.

9. Lalitharatne, T. D., K. Teramoto, Y. Hayashi, K. Tamura, and K. Kiguchi, "EEG-based evaluation for perception-assist in upper-limb power-assist exoskeletons," Proceedings of 2014 World Automation Congress (WAC), 307-312, Waikoloa, HI, 2014.

10. Kilicarslan, A., S. Prasad, R. G. Grossman, and J. L. Contreras-Vidal, "High accuracy decoding of user intentions using EEG to control a lower-body exoskeleton," Proceedings of the 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 5606-5609, Osaka, 2014.

11. Lee, K., D. Liu, L. Perroud, R. Chavarriaga, and J. del R. Millán, "A brain-controlled exoskeleton with cascaded event-related desynchronization classifiers," Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 90, 15-23, 2017.

12. Li, Z., W. He, C. Yang, S. Qiu, L. Zhang, and C. Y. Su, "Teleoperation control of an exoskeleton robot using brain machine interface and visual compressive sensing," Proceedings of 2016 12th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA), 1550-1555, Guilin, 2016.

13. Vidaurre, C., C. Klauer, T. Schauer, A. R. Murguialday, and K.-R. Müller, "EEG-based BCI for the linear control of an upper-limb neuroprosthesis," Medical Engineering & Physics, Vol. 38, 1195-1204, 2016.

14. Schultz, A. E. and T. A. Kuiken, "Neural interfaces for control of upper limb prostheses: The state of the art and future possibilities," PM&R, Vol. 3, No. 1, 55-67, 2011.

15. Noda, T., N. Sugimoto, J. Furukawa, M. A. Sato, S. H. Hyon, and J. Morimoto, "Brain-controlled exoskeleton robot for BMI rehabilitation," Proceedings of the 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2012), 21-27, Osaka, 2012.

16. Ammar, L. I., B. Y. Kaddouh, M. K. Mohanna, and I. H. Elhajj, "SAS: SMA aiding sleeve," Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, 1596-1599, Tianjin, 2010.

17. Ul Islam, M. R. and S. Bai, "Intention detection for dexterous human arm motion with FSR sensor bands," Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 139-140, Vienna, Austria, 2017.

18. Xiao, Z. G., A. M. Elnady, and C. Menon, "Control an exoskeleton for forearm rotation using FMG," Proceedings of the 5th IEEERAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 591-596, Sao Paulo, 2014.

19. Cho, E., R. Chen, L.-K. Merhi, Z. Xiao, B. Pousett, and C. Menon, "Force myography to control robotic upper extremity prostheses: A feasibility study," Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, Vol. 4, 18, 2016.

20. Huang, J., W. Huo, W. Xu, S. Mohammed, and Y. Amirat, "Control of upper-limb power-assist exoskeleton using a human-robot interface based on motion intention recognition," IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1257-1270, 2015.

21. Nguyen, V. T., T.-F. Lu, and P. Grimshaw, "Human intention recognition based on contactless sensors to control an elbow and forearm assistive exoskeleton," Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Asian Society for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology (ASPEN 2017), ARM-P-06, Seoul, Nov. 2017.

22. Fontana, M., F. Salsedo, and M. Bergamasco, "Novel magnetic sensing approach with improved linearity," Sensors, 2013.

23. Wang, S., J. Jin, T. Li, and G. Liu, "High-accuracy magnetic rotary encoder," System Simulation and Scientific Computing, 74-82, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, 2012.

24. Lee, Y. Y., R. H. Wu, and S. T. Xu, "Applications of linear Hall-effect sensors on angular measurement," Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA), 479-482, Denver, CO, 2011.

25. Smirnov, Y., T. Kozina, E. Yurasova, and A. Sokolov, "Analog-to-digital converters of the components of a displacement with the use of microelectronic sine-cosine magnetic encoders," Measurement Techniques, Vol. 57, No. 1, 41-46, 2014.

26. Hu, J., J. Zou, F. Xu, Y. Li, and Y. Fu, "An improved PMSM rotor position sensor based on linear hall sensors," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 48, No. 11, 3591-3594, 2012.

27. Ramsden, E., Hall-effect Sensors. Theory and Applications, 2nd Ed., 272 pages, Newness, Elsevier, 2006.

28. Nguyen, V. T. and T.-F. Lu, "Modelling of magnetic field distributions of elliptical cylinder permanent magnets with diametrical magnetization," Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 491, 2019.

29. Nguyen, V. T. and T.-F. Lu, "Analytical expression of the magnetic field created by a permanent magnet with diametrical magnetization," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 87, 163-174, 2018.

30. Nguyen, V. T., "Modelling of magnetic fields of permanent magnets with diametrical magnetization,", MPhil Thesis, 2019.

31. Jezný, J. and M. Čurilla, "Position measurement with Hall effect sensors," American Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 7, 231-235, 2013.

32. Romilly, D. P., C. Anglin, R. G. Gosine, C. Hershler, and S. U. Raschke, "A functional task analysis and motion simulation for the development of a powered upper-limb orthosis," IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 3, 119-129, 1994.