volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

Low power, near-field (NF) radar imaging techniques have been proposed for breast cancer detection and long-term monitoring. It is important to optimize the data processing paths required for NF image reconstruction given the inherent resolution limitations of microwave compared to MRI or X-ray imaging. A key limitation in obtaining internal tumour and breast feature information is the reflection from the skin surface physically close to the antenna. Typically, algorithms to remove this dominant reflection involve subtracting an estimate of the time domain signal for the skin reflection from one antenna location using information from other locations. A key challenge in these approaches is determining the portion of the signal, the skin dominant window (SDW), to use to determinethe weights applied to nearby antenna signals when calculating the skin reflection estimate. Equipment limitations and breast characteristics impact the amount of data that can be captured, leading to the well-known Gibbs' ringing distortionsin the time domain signals. We suggestthat the Gibbs' ringing from the magnitude larger skin reflection has caused the length of the SDW to be over-estimated in previous determinations. Since this distorted signal now overlaps the time signals from the tumour and breast responses, removing the skin reflection estimatemay result in attenuation of tumour responses. In this contribution, two alternative strategies for designing the SDW are proposed. One minimized the first skin peak in the SDW, i.e., the furthest from the breast feature signals, and the other minimized the main, i.e., largest, skin peak within the SDW. Both new approaches were shown to effectively suppress the skin signal on simulated and patient data while allowing recovery of the missing portions of the desired internal breast feature signals leading to an increase in the overall intensity of the images and preserving the tumour response. However, we provided reasons why we considered that basing the suppression on the largest skin signal peak would provide a more consistent improvement in the breast feature signals.

1. O'Loughlin, D., M. O'Halloran, M. Glavin, J. Martin, E. Jines, and M. A. Elahi, "Microwave breast imaging: Clinical advances and remaining challenges," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 65, No. 11, 2580-2590, Nov. 2018.
doi:10.1109/TBME.2018.2809541 Google Scholar

2. O'Halloran, M., M. Glavin, and E. Jones, "Performance and robustness of a multistatic MIST beamforming algorithm for breast cancer detection," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 105, 403-424, 2010.
doi:10.2528/PIER10011205 Google Scholar

3. Winters, D. W., J. D. Shea, E. L. Madsen, G. R. Frank, B. D. van Veen, and S. C. Hagness, "Estimating the breast surface using UWB microwave monos," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 55, No. 1, 247-256, 2008.
doi:10.1109/TBME.2007.901028 Google Scholar

4. Curtis, C. and E. Fear, "Beamforming in the frequency domain with applications to microwave breast imaging," IEEE 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP)), 72-75, The Hague, Netherlands, 2014. Google Scholar

5. Curtis, C., "Factors affecting image quality in near-field ultra-wideband radar imaging for biomedical applications,", University of Calgary, Calgary, 2015. Google Scholar

6. Bond, E. J., X. Li, S. C. Hagness, and B. D. van Veen, "Microwave imaging via space-time beamforming for early detection of breast cancer," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 8, No. 51, 1690-1705, 2003.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2003.815446 Google Scholar

7. Maklad, B., C. Curtis, E. C. Fear, and G. G. Messier, "Neighborhood-based algorithm to facilitate the reduction of skin re ections in radar-based microwave," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 39, 115-139, 2012.
doi:10.2528/PIERB11122208 Google Scholar

8. Kurrant, D., J. Bourqui, and E. Fear, "Surface estimation for microwave imaging," Sensors, Vol. 17, 1658, 2017.
doi:10.3390/s17071658 Google Scholar

9. Garrett, J. and E. Fear, "A new breast phantom with a durable skin layer for microwave breast imaging," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 63, No. 4, 1693-1700, 2015.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2015.2393854 Google Scholar

10. Bourqui, J., D. Kurrant, B. R. Lavoie, and E. C. Fear, "Adaptive monostatic system for measuring microwave re ection from the breast," Sensors, Vol. 18, No. 5, 1340, 2018.
doi:10.3390/s18051340 Google Scholar

11. Smith, M. R., I. Dasgupta, and E. Fear, "New resolution enhancement approach for tissue sensitive adaptive radar (TSAR)," 32nd Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC 2021), IEEE, Athlone, Ireland, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSC52156.2021.9467874. Google Scholar

12. Harris, F. J., "On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete fourier transform," Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 66, 51-83, 1978.
doi:10.1109/PROC.1978.10837 Google Scholar

13. Smith, M. R., "FFT --- fRISCy Fourier transforms," Microprocessors and Microsystems, Vol. 17, No. 9, 507-521, 1993.
doi:10.1016/S0141-9331(09)91002-X Google Scholar

14. Liang, Z. P., F. E. Boada, R. T. Constable, E. M. Haacke, P. C. Lauterbaur, and M. R. Smith, "Constrained reconstruction methods in MR imaging," Reviews of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 4, No. 2, 67-185, 1992. Google Scholar

15. Mitra, S. K., Digital Signal Processing: A Computer-based Approach, McGraw Hill, 1998.

16. Curtis, C., R. Frayne, and E. Fear, "Using X-ray mammograms to assist in microwave breast image interpretation," International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, 2012, doi.org/10.1155/202/235380. Google Scholar

17. SPEAG "The Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) technique,", [Online], 2020 [cited 2020 December 1]. Available from: speag.swiss/products/semcad/modules/what-is-fdtd/. Google Scholar

18. Bourqui, J., M. Okoniewski, and E. C. Fear, "Balanced antipodal Vivaldi antenna with dielectric director for near-field microwave imaging," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 58, No. 7, 2318-2326, 2010.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2010.2048844 Google Scholar

19. Mathworks "DTW --- Distance between signals using dynamic time warping,", [Online], 2021 [cited 2021 3]. Available from: mathworks.com/help/signal/ref/dtw.html. Google Scholar

20. Petitjean, F. and I. Paparrizos, "DBA: Averaging for dynamic time warping,", [Online], 2017 [cited 2021 3 1]. Available from: github.com/fpetitjean/DBA. Google Scholar

21. Petitjean, F., K. Ketterlin, and P. Gancarski, "A global averaging method for dynamic time warping, with applications to clustering," Pattern Recognition, Vol. 4, No. 3, 678-693, 2011.
doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2010.09.013 Google Scholar

22. Schultz, D. and B. Jain, "Non-smooth analysis and sub-gradient methods for averaging in dynamic time warping spaces," Pattern Recognition, Vol. 74, 340-358, 2017. Google Scholar

23. Chan, R. S. L., P. Gordon, and M. R. Smith, "Evaluation of dynamic time warp barycenter aver-aging (DBA) for its potential in generating a consensus nanopore signal for genetic and epigenetic sequences," International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC'18), 4821-2824, IEEE, Honolulu, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512873. Google Scholar

24. Smith, M. R., R. S. L. Chan, and P. Gordon, "Evaluating the accuracy of consensus nanosequencer squiggles generated by dynamic time warp barycentre averaging (DBA)," IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 233-237, IEEE, Berlin, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856460. Google Scholar

25. Smith, M., R. Chan, M. Khurram, and P. Gordon, "Evaluating the effectiveness of ensemble voting in improving the accuracy of consensus signals produced by various DTWA algorithms from step-current signals generated during nanopore sequencing," PLoS Computational Biology, Vol. 17, No. 9, e1009350, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009350.
doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009350 Google Scholar

Dr. Michael R. Smith

Professor Elise C. Fear