Vol. 148
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERC 148 [2024] PIERC 147 [2024] PIERC 146 [2024] PIERC 145 [2024] PIERC 144 [2024] PIERC 143 [2024] PIERC 142 [2024] PIERC 141 [2024] PIERC 140 [2024] PIERC 139 [2024] PIERC 138 [2023] PIERC 137 [2023] PIERC 136 [2023] PIERC 135 [2023] PIERC 134 [2023] PIERC 133 [2023] PIERC 132 [2023] PIERC 131 [2023] PIERC 130 [2023] PIERC 129 [2023] PIERC 128 [2023] PIERC 127 [2022] PIERC 126 [2022] PIERC 125 [2022] PIERC 124 [2022] PIERC 123 [2022] PIERC 122 [2022] PIERC 121 [2022] PIERC 120 [2022] PIERC 119 [2022] PIERC 118 [2022] PIERC 117 [2021] PIERC 116 [2021] PIERC 115 [2021] PIERC 114 [2021] PIERC 113 [2021] PIERC 112 [2021] PIERC 111 [2021] PIERC 110 [2021] PIERC 109 [2021] PIERC 108 [2021] PIERC 107 [2021] PIERC 106 [2020] PIERC 105 [2020] PIERC 104 [2020] PIERC 103 [2020] PIERC 102 [2020] PIERC 101 [2020] PIERC 100 [2020] PIERC 99 [2020] PIERC 98 [2020] PIERC 97 [2019] PIERC 96 [2019] PIERC 95 [2019] PIERC 94 [2019] PIERC 93 [2019] PIERC 92 [2019] PIERC 91 [2019] PIERC 90 [2019] PIERC 89 [2019] PIERC 88 [2018] PIERC 87 [2018] PIERC 86 [2018] PIERC 85 [2018] PIERC 84 [2018] PIERC 83 [2018] PIERC 82 [2018] PIERC 81 [2018] PIERC 80 [2018] PIERC 79 [2017] PIERC 78 [2017] PIERC 77 [2017] PIERC 76 [2017] PIERC 75 [2017] PIERC 74 [2017] PIERC 73 [2017] PIERC 72 [2017] PIERC 71 [2017] PIERC 70 [2016] PIERC 69 [2016] PIERC 68 [2016] PIERC 67 [2016] PIERC 66 [2016] PIERC 65 [2016] PIERC 64 [2016] PIERC 63 [2016] PIERC 62 [2016] PIERC 61 [2016] PIERC 60 [2015] PIERC 59 [2015] PIERC 58 [2015] PIERC 57 [2015] PIERC 56 [2015] PIERC 55 [2014] PIERC 54 [2014] PIERC 53 [2014] PIERC 52 [2014] PIERC 51 [2014] PIERC 50 [2014] PIERC 49 [2014] PIERC 48 [2014] PIERC 47 [2014] PIERC 46 [2014] PIERC 45 [2013] PIERC 44 [2013] PIERC 43 [2013] PIERC 42 [2013] PIERC 41 [2013] PIERC 40 [2013] PIERC 39 [2013] PIERC 38 [2013] PIERC 37 [2013] PIERC 36 [2013] PIERC 35 [2013] PIERC 34 [2013] PIERC 33 [2012] PIERC 32 [2012] PIERC 31 [2012] PIERC 30 [2012] PIERC 29 [2012] PIERC 28 [2012] PIERC 27 [2012] PIERC 26 [2012] PIERC 25 [2012] PIERC 24 [2011] PIERC 23 [2011] PIERC 22 [2011] PIERC 21 [2011] PIERC 20 [2011] PIERC 19 [2011] PIERC 18 [2011] PIERC 17 [2010] PIERC 16 [2010] PIERC 15 [2010] PIERC 14 [2010] PIERC 13 [2010] PIERC 12 [2010] PIERC 11 [2009] PIERC 10 [2009] PIERC 9 [2009] PIERC 8 [2009] PIERC 7 [2009] PIERC 6 [2009] PIERC 5 [2008] PIERC 4 [2008] PIERC 3 [2008] PIERC 2 [2008] PIERC 1 [2008]
2024-09-19
Double and Triple-Vector Hybrid Modulation Model Predictive Control Based on Virtual Synchronous Generator
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 148, 43-54, 2024
Abstract
To address the issues of high current harmonic and power ripple in the traditional Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control (FCS-MPC) strategy for virtual synchronous generator system with quasi-Z-source inverter (qZSI-VSG), a double and triple-vector hybrid modulation model predictive control strategy is proposed. This strategy utilizes the inductor current sub-cost function to select the shoot-through state (ST state) or the non-shoot-through state (NST state). When NST state is selected, the voltage vector combinations in the double-vector and the triple-vector are initially established. Then, the voltage vector combinations are reduced from 18 groups to 6 groups by using the vector combination quick selection table. Subsequently, the duty cycle of each voltage vector is then determined based on the value of its cost function, and the voltage vector is re-synthesized. Finally, the predicted values of all control variables are calculated and substituted into the cost function for optimization. Experimental results show that the proposed strategy reduces 48.62% of current harmonic, 50% of active power ripple and 25.53% of capacitor voltage ripple compared to the traditional strategy, which effectively improves the system control performance.
Citation
Yang Zhang, Yuwei Meng, Xiuhai Yang, Kun Cao, Sai Zhang, and Zhun Cheng, "Double and Triple-Vector Hybrid Modulation Model Predictive Control Based on Virtual Synchronous Generator," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 148, 43-54, 2024.
doi:10.2528/PIERC24062504
References

1. Yang, Xiang-Zhen, Jian-Hui Su, Ming Ding, Jin-Wei Li, and Yan Du, "Control strategy for virtual synchronous generator in microgrid," 2011 4th International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies (DRPT), 1633-1637, Weihai, China, Jul. 2011.

2. Xu, H., "Research on generalized inertia and reactive power sharing strategy of VSG," Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China, 2017.

3. Visscher, Klaas and Sjoerd Walter Hero De Haan, "Virtual synchronous machines (VSG's) for frequency stabilisation in future grids with a significant share of decentralized generation," CIRED Seminar 2008: SmartGrids for Distribution, 1-4, Frankfurt, Germany, Jun. 2008.

4. Peng, Fang Zheng, "Z-source inverter," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 39, No. 2, 504-510, Mar.-Apr. 2003.

5. Wang, Zhen, Yougui Guo, Yu Guo, et al., "Quasi Z-source six-leg voltage-source inverter based on a new space vector modulation strategy," Power System Protection and Control, Vol. 46, No. 21, 45-54, Nov. 2018.

6. Liu, C., X. Tian, Y. Wang, G. Cai, and X. Tian, "Single-phase multi-cell voltage source inverter," Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, Vol. 32, No. 24, 8-96+114, Nov. 2017.

7. Anderson, Joel and Fang Z. Peng, "Four quasi-Z-source inverters," 2008 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2743-2749, Rhodes, Greece, Jun. 2008.

8. Cheema, Khalid Mehmood and Kashif Mehmood, "Improved virtual synchronous generator control to analyse and enhance the transient stability of microgrid," IET Renewable Power Generation, Vol. 14, No. 4, 495-505, 2020.

9. Feng, Jiajie, Feifei Bai, Mithulananthan Nadarajah, and Hui Ma, "Transition towards inverter-based generation with VSG control: Low frequency instability prospective," 2023 IEEE International Conference on Energy Technologies for Future Grids (ETFG), 1-6, Wollongong, Australia, Dec. 2023.

10. Vazquez, Sergio, Jose I. Leon, Leopoldo G. Franquelo, Jose Rodriguez, Hector A. Young, Abraham Marquez, and Pericle Zanchetta, "Model predictive control: A review of its applications in power electronics," IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, Vol. 8, No. 1, 16-31, Mar. 2014.

11. Rodriguez, Jose, Marian P. Kazmierkowski, Jose R. Espinoza, Pericle Zanchetta, Haitham Abu-Rub, Hector A. Young, and Christian A. Rojas, "State of the art of finite control set model predictive control in power electronics," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1003-1016, May 2013.

12. Mosa, Mostafa, Robert S. Balog, and Haitham Abu-Rub, "High-performance predictive control of quasi-impedance source inverter," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 32, No. 4, 3251-3262, Apr. 2017.

13. Bakeer, Abualkasim, Mohamed A. Ismeil, and Mohamed Orabi, "A powerful finite control set-model predictive control algorithm for quasi Z-source inverter," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1371-1379, Aug. 2016.

14. Zheng, Changming, Tomislav Dragičević, and Frede Blaabjerg, "Model predictive control-based virtual inertia emulator for an islanded alternating current microgrid," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 68, No. 8, 7167-7177, Aug. 2021.
doi:10.1109/TIE.2020.3007105

15. Chen, Wei, Sike Zeng, Guozheng Zhang, Tingna Shi, and Changliang Xia, "A modified double vectors model predictive torque control of permanent magnet synchronous motor," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 34, No. 11, 11419-11428, Nov. 2019.

16. Zhang, Yongchang and Haitao Yang, "Two-vector-based model predictive torque control without weighting factors for induction motor drives," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 31, No. 2, 1381-1390, Feb. 2016.

17. Zhang, Yongchang, Yubin Peng, and Haitao Yang, "Performance improvement of two-vectors-based model predictive control of PWM rectifier," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 31, No. 8, 6016-6030, Aug. 2016.

18. Lan, Zhiyong, Bo Wang, Chen Xu, and L. Li, "A novel three-vector model predictive current control for permanent magnet synchronous motor," Proceedings of the CSEE, Vol. 38, No. S1, 243-249, 2018.

19. Tarisciotti, Luca, Pericle Zanchetta, Alan Watson, Stefano Bifaretti, and Jon C. Clare, "Modulated model predictive control for a seven-level cascaded H-bridge back-to-back converter," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 61, No. 10, 5375-5383, Oct. 2014.

20. Yeoh, Seang Shen, Tao Yang, Luca Tarisciotti, Christopher Ian Hill, Serhiy Bozhko, and Pericle Zanchetta, "Permanent-magnet machine-based starter-generator system with modulated model predictive control," IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, Vol. 3, No. 4, 878-890, Dec. 2017.

21. Tarisciotti, Luca, Jiaxing Lei, Andrea Formentini, Andrew Trentin, Pericle Zanchetta, Patrick Wheeler, and Marco Rivera, "Modulated predictive control for indirect matrix converter," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 53, No. 5, 4644-4654, 2017.

22. Tarisciotti, Luca, Andrea Formentini, Alberto Gaeta, Marco Degano, Pericle Zanchetta, Roberto Rabbeni, and Marcello Pucci, "Model predictive control for shunt active filters with fixed switching frequency," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 53, No. 1, 296-304, Jan.-Feb. 2017.

23. Donoso, Felipe, Andrés Mora, Roberto Cárdenas, Alejandro Angulo, Doris Sáez, and Marco Rivera, "Finite-set model-predictive control strategies for a 3L-NPC inverter operating with fixed switching frequency," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 65, No. 5, 3954-3965, May 2018.

24. Zhang, Huaguang, Sunghyok Kim, Qiuye Sun, and Jianguo Zhou, "Distributed adaptive virtual impedance control for accurate reactive power sharing based on consensus control in microgrids," IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1749-1761, 2017.
doi:10.1109/TSG.2015.2506760