Vol. 160
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERC 162 [2025] PIERC 161 [2025] PIERC 160 [2025] PIERC 159 [2025] PIERC 158 [2025] PIERC 157 [2025] PIERC 156 [2025] PIERC 155 [2025] PIERC 154 [2025] PIERC 153 [2025] PIERC 152 [2025] PIERC 151 [2025] PIERC 150 [2024] PIERC 149 [2024] PIERC 148 [2024] PIERC 147 [2024] PIERC 146 [2024] PIERC 145 [2024] PIERC 144 [2024] PIERC 143 [2024] PIERC 142 [2024] PIERC 141 [2024] PIERC 140 [2024] PIERC 139 [2024] PIERC 138 [2023] PIERC 137 [2023] PIERC 136 [2023] PIERC 135 [2023] PIERC 134 [2023] PIERC 133 [2023] PIERC 132 [2023] PIERC 131 [2023] PIERC 130 [2023] PIERC 129 [2023] PIERC 128 [2023] PIERC 127 [2022] PIERC 126 [2022] PIERC 125 [2022] PIERC 124 [2022] PIERC 123 [2022] PIERC 122 [2022] PIERC 121 [2022] PIERC 120 [2022] PIERC 119 [2022] PIERC 118 [2022] PIERC 117 [2021] PIERC 116 [2021] PIERC 115 [2021] PIERC 114 [2021] PIERC 113 [2021] PIERC 112 [2021] PIERC 111 [2021] PIERC 110 [2021] PIERC 109 [2021] PIERC 108 [2021] PIERC 107 [2021] PIERC 106 [2020] PIERC 105 [2020] PIERC 104 [2020] PIERC 103 [2020] PIERC 102 [2020] PIERC 101 [2020] PIERC 100 [2020] PIERC 99 [2020] PIERC 98 [2020] PIERC 97 [2019] PIERC 96 [2019] PIERC 95 [2019] PIERC 94 [2019] PIERC 93 [2019] PIERC 92 [2019] PIERC 91 [2019] PIERC 90 [2019] PIERC 89 [2019] PIERC 88 [2018] PIERC 87 [2018] PIERC 86 [2018] PIERC 85 [2018] PIERC 84 [2018] PIERC 83 [2018] PIERC 82 [2018] PIERC 81 [2018] PIERC 80 [2018] PIERC 79 [2017] PIERC 78 [2017] PIERC 77 [2017] PIERC 76 [2017] PIERC 75 [2017] PIERC 74 [2017] PIERC 73 [2017] PIERC 72 [2017] PIERC 71 [2017] PIERC 70 [2016] PIERC 69 [2016] PIERC 68 [2016] PIERC 67 [2016] PIERC 66 [2016] PIERC 65 [2016] PIERC 64 [2016] PIERC 63 [2016] PIERC 62 [2016] PIERC 61 [2016] PIERC 60 [2015] PIERC 59 [2015] PIERC 58 [2015] PIERC 57 [2015] PIERC 56 [2015] PIERC 55 [2014] PIERC 54 [2014] PIERC 53 [2014] PIERC 52 [2014] PIERC 51 [2014] PIERC 50 [2014] PIERC 49 [2014] PIERC 48 [2014] PIERC 47 [2014] PIERC 46 [2014] PIERC 45 [2013] PIERC 44 [2013] PIERC 43 [2013] PIERC 42 [2013] PIERC 41 [2013] PIERC 40 [2013] PIERC 39 [2013] PIERC 38 [2013] PIERC 37 [2013] PIERC 36 [2013] PIERC 35 [2013] PIERC 34 [2013] PIERC 33 [2012] PIERC 32 [2012] PIERC 31 [2012] PIERC 30 [2012] PIERC 29 [2012] PIERC 28 [2012] PIERC 27 [2012] PIERC 26 [2012] PIERC 25 [2012] PIERC 24 [2011] PIERC 23 [2011] PIERC 22 [2011] PIERC 21 [2011] PIERC 20 [2011] PIERC 19 [2011] PIERC 18 [2011] PIERC 17 [2010] PIERC 16 [2010] PIERC 15 [2010] PIERC 14 [2010] PIERC 13 [2010] PIERC 12 [2010] PIERC 11 [2009] PIERC 10 [2009] PIERC 9 [2009] PIERC 8 [2009] PIERC 7 [2009] PIERC 6 [2009] PIERC 5 [2008] PIERC 4 [2008] PIERC 3 [2008] PIERC 2 [2008] PIERC 1 [2008]
2025-09-28
Magnetostrictive Vibration Behavior of an Amorphous Alloy Transformer Featuring a Three-Dimensional Coil Core
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 160, 143-153, 2025
Abstract
The novel amorphous alloy transformer featuring a closed three-dimensional coil core (CTDCC) represents an innovative approach to transformer structure. In contrast to the conventional three-phase five-column transformer equipped with a planar coil core (PCC), the CTDCC configuration displays a completely equal magnetic circuit, leading to improved short-circuit tolerance. Nevertheless, the design and manufacturing process of the core faces a notable engineering obstacle due to the amplified magnetostrictive coefficient of the amorphous alloy, resulting in vibration noise. In order to address this issue, a magnetic-mechanical coupling mathematical model is developed in this research to analyze the magnetostrictive effect of the amorphous alloy CTDCC. Three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) is utilized to compute the magnetic flux distribution and quivering dislocation dissipation of the CTDCC. Furthermore, a validation experiment is carried out on a 30 kVA amorphous alloy CTDCC model to confirm the precision of the model. Moreover, the CTDCC structure has been proven to effectively minimize surface vibrations compared to the PCC model. Additionally, it unveils the governing frequency law of vibration movement at various locations within the CTDCC structure. This revelation serves as a fundamental basis for developing strategies to mitigate vibrations and control noise during the CTDCC design.
Citation
Romaric Kammeugue Noubissi, Daosheng Liu, and Boxue Du, "Magnetostrictive Vibration Behavior of an Amorphous Alloy Transformer Featuring a Three-Dimensional Coil Core," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 160, 143-153, 2025.
doi:10.2528/PIERC25010102
References

1. Gao, J. E., H. X. Li, Z. B. Jiao, Y. Wu, Y. H. Chen, T. Yu, and Z. P. Lu, "Effects of nanocrystal formation on the soft magnetic properties of Fe-based bulk metallic glasses," Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 99, No. 5, 052504, 2011.

2. Zhang, Jiahao, Ronggao Cui, Yu Wei, Degui Yu, Shunde Xie, Shitong Fang, and Jun Shen, "Optimization and experimental validation of amorphous alloy high-speed asynchronous motor for simultaneous reduction on core and copper losses," IEEE Access, Vol. 11, 101112–101122, 2023.

3. Li, Yongjian, Zitong Yang, Changgeng Zhang, and Shenghui Mu, "Vibration and noise measurement of medium-high frequency transformer cores under non-sinusoidal excitation," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 58, No. 8, 1-5, 2022.

4. Zhu, Lihua, Jianying Hao, and Lan Lu, "Research on influence of damping on the vibration noise of transformer," IEEE Access, Vol. 10, 92128-92136, 2022.

5. Zhang, Pengning and Lin Li, "Vibration and noise characteristics of high-frequency amorphous transformer under sinusoidal and non-sinusoidal voltage excitation," International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 123, 106298, 2020.

6. Liu, Daosheng, Jiachen Li, Romaric Kammeugue Noubissi, Shihui Wang, Xiangdong Xu, and Qianming Liu, "Magnetic properties and vibration characteristics of amorphous alloy strip and its combination," IET Electric Power Applications, Vol. 13, No. 10, 1589-1597, 2019.

7. Du, B. X. and D. S. Liu, "Dynamic behavior of magnetostriction-induced vibration and noise of amorphous alloy cores," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 51, No. 4, 1-8, 2015.

8. Mohammed, O. A., S. Liu, and N. Abed, "Study of the inverse magnetostriction effect on machine deformation," IEEE SoutheastCon, 2004. Proceedings., 433-436, Greensboro, NC, USA, Mar. 2004.

9. Fonteyn, Katarzyna A., Anouar Belahcen, Paavo Rasilo, Reijo Kouhia, and Antero Arkkio, "Contribution of Maxwell stress in air on the deformations of induction machines," Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7, No. 3, 336-341, May 2012.

10. Delaere, K., W. Heylen, K. Hameyer, and R. Belmans, "Local magnetostriction forces for finite element analysis," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 36, No. 5, 3115-3118, 2000.

11. Besbes, M., Z. Ren, and A. Razek, "Finite element analysis of magneto-mechanical coupled phenomena in magnetostrictive materials," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1058-1061, 1996.

12. Hilgert, Tom, Lieven Vandevelde, and Jan Melkebeek, "Comparison of magnetostriction models for use in calculations of vibrations in magnetic cores," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 44, No. 6, 874-877, 2008.

13. Zhang, Pengning, Lin Li, Zhiguang Cheng, Cong Tian, and Yu Han, "Study on vibration of iron core of transformer and reactor based on maxwell stress and anisotropic magnetostriction," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 55, No. 2, 1-5, 2019.

14. Wu, Shengnan, Wenjie Li, Wenming Tong, and Renyuan Tang, "Electromagnetic vibration and noise comparison of amorphous metal PMSMs and silicon steel PMSMs," IEEE Access, Vol. 7, 62672-62680, 2019.

15. Mizuta, Takahiro, Yoshihiro Tani, and Koji Fujiwara, "Magnetic property of amorphous magnetic thin ribbon and its laminated bulk under tensile and compressive stresses," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 54, No. 11, 1-5, 2018.

16. Chang, Yeong-Hwa, Chang-Hung Hsu, Huei-Lung Chu, and Ching-Pei Tseng, "Magnetomechanical vibrations of three-phase three-leg transformer with different amorphous-cored structures," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 47, No. 10, 2780-2783, 2011.

17. Elhaminia, Pedram, Ehsan Hajipour, and Mehdi Vakilian, "Magnetic flux density determination in 3D wound core transformer using H-balance equation," 2019 International Power System Conference (PSC), 565-570, Tehran, Iran, Dec. 2019.

18. Hu, Jingzhu, Bing Zhou, Yanzhao Wang, Ni Li, Yuan Ni, and Zheyuan Gan, "Analysis of vibration characteristics and noise reduction for 10 kV oil-immersed transformer," Fluctuation and Noise Letters, Vol. 22, No. 06, 2350048, 2023.

19. Yang, B., X. Fan, et al. "Modeling and no-load characteristics analysis of 3D wound core transformer considering core nonlinearity," Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, Vol. 37, No. 9, 2263-2274, 2022.

20. Zhou, Xiaoyu and Lihua Zhu, "Magnetostrictive simulation of amorphous alloy based on dynamic Jiles-Atherton model," The Proceedings of the 9th Frontier Academic Forum of Electrical Engineering, 765-774, Apr. 2021.

21. Liu, Daosheng, Boxue Du, Muqiu Yan, and Shihui Wang, "Suppressing noise for an HTS amorphous metal core transformer by using microperforated panel absorber," IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 26, No. 7, 1-5, 2016.

22. Zhu, Lihua, Jingjing Li, Qingxin Yang, Jianguo Zhu, and Chang-Seop Koh, "An improved magnetostriction model for electrical steel sheet based on Jiles–Atherton model," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 56, No. 3, 1-4, 2020.

23. Liu, Mingyong, Olivier Hubert, Xavier Mininger, Frédéric Bouillault, Laurent Bernard, and Thierry Waeckerlé, "Reduction of power transformer core noise generation due to magnetostriction-induced deformations using fully coupled finite-element modeling optimization procedures," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 53, No. 8, 1-11, 2017.