volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

A Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) antenna consisting of two 90° angularly separated semicircular monopoles with steps for Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, Wi-MAX and UWB applications is proposed. Initially, an array of two coplanar circular monopoles with element separation of 25 mm is investigated. In this configuration, mutual coupling is < -5 dB and < -10 dB over 2 GHz-3 GHz and 3 GHz-10.6 GHz, respectively. Mutual coupling is reduced by using 90° angularly separated semicircular monopoles. With semicircular configuration, though the mutual coupling is improved, impedance bandwidth is reduced due to reduction in electrical length. A step like structure is introduced in the semicircular monopoles, and ground plane is modified and extended between the two elements to improve the impedance bandwidth and mutual coupling. Impedance bandwidth from 2.0 GHz-10.6 GHz with S₂₁ < -20 dB and -14 dB is achieved over 3.1 GHz-10.6 GHz and 2.0-3.1 GHz, respectively. The antenna is fabricated using 46 mm × 37 mm RT Duroid substrate. Measurement results agree with the simulation os. Radiation patterns are stable, and correlation coefficient is < 0.02 over 2.0-10.6 GHz.

1. Andersen, J. and H. Rasmussen, "Decoupling and descattering networks for antennas," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation, Vol. 24, No. 6, 841-846, Nov. 1976.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1976.1141437 Google Scholar

2. Yang, F. and Y. Rahmat-Samii, "Microstrip antennas integrated with electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) structures: A low mutual coupling design for array applications," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation, Vol. 51, No. 10, 2936-2946, Oct. 2003.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2003.817983 Google Scholar

3. Ramon, G., P. Maagt, and M. Sorolla, "Enhanced patch-antenna performance by suppression surface waves using photonic-bandgap substrates," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., Vol. 47, No. 11, 2131-2138, 1999.
doi:10.1109/22.798009 Google Scholar

4. Salehi, M., A. Motevasselian, A. Tavakoli, and T. Heidari, "Mutual coupling reduction of microstrip antennas using defected ground structure," 10th IEEE Singapore International Conference on Communication systems, 1-5, 2005. Google Scholar

5. Xiao, S., M.-C. Tang, Y.-Y. Bai, S. Gao, and B.-Z. Wang, "Mutual coupling suppression in microstrip array using defected ground structure," IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, Vol. 5, No. 12, 1488-1494, May 2011.
doi:10.1049/iet-map.2010.0154 Google Scholar

6. Bait-Suwailam, M. M., M. S. Boybay, and O. M. Ramahi, "Electromagnetic coupling reduction in high-profile monopole antennas using single-negative magnetic metamaterials for MIMO applications," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation, Vol. 58, No. 9, 2894-2902, Sep. 2010.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2010.2052560 Google Scholar

7. Khaleela, H. R., H. M. Al-Rizzob, D. G. Rucker, Y. A. Rahmatallahb, and S. Mohan, "Mutual coupling reduction of dual-band printed monopoles using MNG metamaterial," IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI), 2219-2222, 2011.
doi:10.1109/APS.2011.5996956 Google Scholar

8. Najam, A., Y. Duroc, and S. Tedjni, "UWB-MIMO antenna with novel stub structure," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 19, 245-257, 2011. Google Scholar

9. Li, Y., W. X. Li, C. Liu, and T. Jiang, "Two UWB-MIMO antennas with high isolation using sleeve coupled stepped impedance resonators," 2012 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Antennas and Propagation, 21-22, Singapore, Aug. 27-29, 2012. Google Scholar

10. Jusoh, M., M. F. Jamlos, M. R. Kamarudin, and F. Malek, "A MIMO antenna design challenges for UWB application," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 36, 357-371, 2012.
doi:10.2528/PIERB11092701 Google Scholar

11. Zhang, S., Z. Ying, J. Xiong, and S. He, "Ultrawideband MIMO/diversity antennas with a tree-like structure to enhance wideband isolation," IEEE Antennas And Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 8, 1279-1282, 2009.
doi:10.1109/LAWP.2009.2037027 Google Scholar

12. Prasanna, K. M. and S. K. Behera, "Compact two-port UWB MIMO antenna system with high isolation using a fork-shaped structure," 2013 International Conference on Communications and Signal Processing (ICCSP), Vol. 8, 726-729, 2009. Google Scholar

13. Zhang, S., B. K. Lau, A. Sunesson, and S. He, "Closely-packed UWB MIMO/diversity antenna with different patterns and polarizations for USB dongle applications," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation, Vol. 60, No. 9, 4372-4380, Sep. 2012.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2012.2207049 Google Scholar

14. See, T. S. P. and Z. N. Chen, "An ultrawideband diversity antenna," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation, Vol. 57, No. 6, 1597-1605, Jun. 2009.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2009.2019908 Google Scholar

15. Reddy, G. S., A. Chittora, S. Kharche, and J. Mukherjee, "Bluetooth/UWB planar diversity antenna with WiMAX and WLAN band-notch characteristics," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 54, 303-320, 2013.
doi:10.2528/PIERB13080404 Google Scholar

16. Najam, A. I., Y. Duroc, S. Tedjini, and J. F. A. Leao, "A novel co-located antennas system for UWB MIMO applications," IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium, RWS' 09, 368-371, Jan. 18-22, 2009. Google Scholar

17. Najam, A. I., Y. Duroc, and S. Tedjini, "Design and analysis of MIMO antennas for UWB communications," Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 1-5, Apr. 12-16, 2010. Google Scholar

18. IE3D Release 14, Zeland Software Inc., , Fremont, CA, USA, 2008. Google Scholar

19. Kumar, G. and K. P. Ray, Brooadband Microstrip Antennas, Artech House, Norwood, MA, 2003.

20. Mishra, S. K., R. K. Gupta, A. Vaidya, and J. Mukherjee, "1 x 3 microstrip line-fed metal-plated split U shaped omnidirectional ultra-wideband monopole antenna," IETE Journal of Research, Vol. 58, No. 5, 429-434, Sep.-Oct. 2012.
doi:10.4103/0377-2063.104162 Google Scholar

21. Ahmed, O. M. H. and A.-R. Sebak, "A printed monopole antenna with two steps and a circular slot for UWB applications," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 7, 411-413, 2008.
doi:10.1109/LAWP.2008.2001026 Google Scholar

22. Blanch, S., J. Romeu, and I. Corbella, "Exact representation of antenna system diversity performance from input parameter description," Electron. Lett., Vol. 39, No. 9, 705-707, May 2003.
doi:10.1049/el:20030495 Google Scholar

23. Ko, S. C. K. and R. D. Murch, "Compact integrated diversity antenna for wireless communications," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation, Vol. 49, No. 6, 954-960, 2001.
doi:10.1109/8.931154 Google Scholar

Mrs. Shilpa U. Kharche

Dr. Gopi Shrikanth Reddy

Dr. Biswajeet Mukherjee

Professor Rajiv Kumar Gupta

Prof. Jayanta Mukherjee