volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

In this paper we are concerned with a microwave imaging problem for a non-magnetic two-layered background medium, where objects are buried in the lower half-space, and the scattered field is collected in the upper one according to a multi-monostatic configuration. In particular, we are interested in estimating the achievable transverse resolution. As well known, range resolution mainly depends on the working frequency band whereas transverse resolution depends on the geometrical parameters of the configuration and is usually computed in correspondence to the highest (or even the average) adopted frequency. Determining transverse resolution is much more difficult, and closed form estimations have been actually found only for the case of unbounded observation domain. However, in real scattering scenarios measurements have to be necessarily collected under an aspect limited setup. Therefore, in order to fill such a theoretical gap, here the focus is on the estimation of transverse resolution for bounded observation domains. To this end, we consider a single-frequency 2D scalar prototype configuration where the buried scattering object domain is represented by a strip parallel to the half-space interface. More in detail, we succeed in finding an analytical estimation of the transverse resolution which highlights the role of the configuration parameters as well as the dielectric permittivity of the lower half-space.

1. Daniels, D. J., Ground Penetrating Radar, Wiley Online Library, 2005.

2. Pastorino, M., "Stochastic optimization methods applied to microwave imaging: A review," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 55, No. 3, 538-548, Mar. 2007.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2007.891568 Google Scholar

3. Chen, X., K.-M. Huang, and X.-B. Xu, "Microwave imaging of buried inhomogeneous objects using parallel genetic algorithm combined with FDTD method," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 53, 283-298, 2005.
doi:10.2528/PIER04102902 Google Scholar

4. Hajebi, M., A. Tavakoli, and A. Hoorfar, "Frequency domain inverse profiling of buried dielectric elliptical-cylindrical objects using evolutionary programming," IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 4, 503-507, Apr. 2018.
doi:10.1109/LGRS.2017.2788699 Google Scholar

5. Sallucci, M., L. Poli, N. Anselmi, and A. Massa, "Multifrequency particle swarm optimization for enhanced multiresolution GPR microwave imaging," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, Vol. 55, No. 3, 1305-1317, 2017.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2016.2622061 Google Scholar

6. Kamilov, U. S., D. Liu, H. Mansour, and P. T. Boufounos, "A recursive born approach to nonlinear inverse scattering," IEEE Signal Process. Lett., Vol. 23, No. 8, 1052-1056, 2016.
doi:10.1109/LSP.2016.2579647 Google Scholar

7. Yu, Y., T. Yu, and L. Carin, "Three-dimensional inverse scattering of a dielectric target embedded in a lossy half-space," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, Vol. 42, No. 5, 957-973, 2004.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2003.820601 Google Scholar

8. Isernia, T., V. Pascazio, and R. Pierri, "On the local minima in a tomographic imaging technique," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, Vol. 39, No. 7, 1596-1607, 2001.
doi:10.1109/36.934091 Google Scholar

9. Dong, Q. and C. M. Rappaport, "Microwave subsurface imaging using direct finite-difference frequency-domain-based inversion," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, Vol. 47, No. 11, 3664-3670, 2009.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2009.2028740 Google Scholar

10. Cui, T. J. and W. C. Chew, "Novel diffraction tomographic algorithm for imaging two-dimensional targets buried under a lossy earth," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2033-2041, 2000.
doi:10.1109/36.851784 Google Scholar

11. Sun, Y., L. Qu, S. Zhang, and Y. Yin, "MT-BCS-based two-dimensional diffraction tomographic GPR imaging algorithm with multivie multistatic configuration," IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 6, 831-835, 2016.
doi:10.1109/LGRS.2016.2549538 Google Scholar

12. Qu, L., Y. Yin, Y. Sun, and L. Zhang, "Diffraction tomographic ground-penetrating radar multibistatic imaging algorithm with compressive frequency measurements," IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 10, 2011-2015, 2015.
doi:10.1109/LGRS.2015.2441991 Google Scholar

13. Hansen, T. B. and P. M. Johansen, "Inversion scheme for ground penetrating radar that takes into account the planar air soil interface," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, Vol. 38, No. 1, 496-506, 2000.
doi:10.1109/36.823944 Google Scholar

14. Leone, G. and F. Soldovieri, "Analysis of the distorted born approximation for subsurface reconstruction: Truncation and uncertainties effects," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, Vol. 41, No. 1, 66-74, 2003.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2002.806999 Google Scholar

15. Fortuny-Guasch, J., "A novel 3-D subsurface radar imaging technique," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, Vol. 40, No. 2, 443-452, 2002.
doi:10.1109/36.992808 Google Scholar

16. Bertero, M., "Linear inverse and ill-posed problems," Adv. Electron. Electron Phys., Vol. 75, 1-120, 1989. Google Scholar

17. Soumekh, M., "A system model and inversion for synthetic aperture radar imaging," IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 1, No. 1, 64-76, 1992.
doi:10.1109/83.128031 Google Scholar

18. Lopez-Sanchez, J. M. and J. Fortuny-Guasch, "3-D radar imaging using range migration techniques," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 48, No. 5, 728-737, 2000.
doi:10.1109/8.855491 Google Scholar

19. Cui, T. J., W. C. Chew, X. X. Yin, and W. Hong, "Study of resolution and super resolution in electromagnetic imaging for half-space problems," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Vol. 52, No. 6, 1398-1411, 2004.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2004.829847 Google Scholar

20. Maisto, M. A., R. Solimene, and R. Pierri, "Resolution limits in inverse source problem beyond the Fresnel zone," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Vol. 36, No. 5, 826-833, 2019.
doi:10.1364/JOSAA.36.000826 Google Scholar

21. Maisto, M. A., R. Solimene, and R. Pierri, "Depth resolution in strip current reconstructions in near non-reactive zone," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Vol. 36, No. 6, 975-982, 2019.
doi:10.1364/JOSAA.36.000975 Google Scholar

22. Solimene, R., M. A. Maisto, and R. Pierri, "Inverse source in near field: The case of strip current," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Vol. 35, 755-763, 2018.
doi:10.1364/JOSAA.35.000755 Google Scholar

23. Tikhonov, A. N. and V. I. Arsenine, Solution to Ill-posed Problems, Halstead, 1977.

24. Cheney, M. and R. J. Bonneau, "Imaging that exploits multipath scattering from point scatterers," Inverse Problems, Vol. 20, 1691-1711, 2004.
doi:10.1088/0266-5611/20/5/023 Google Scholar

25. Maisto, M. A., R. Solimene, and R. Pierri, "Sampling approach for singular system computation of a radiation operator," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Vol. 36, 353-361, 2019.
doi:10.1364/JOSAA.36.000975 Google Scholar

26. Gabor, D., "Light and information," Progress in Optics, E. Wolf, ed., Vol. 1, 109–153, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1961. Google Scholar

Dr. Maria Antonia Maisto

Dr. Raffaele Solimene

Prof. Rocco Pierri