volume | PIER Journals

2020-12-29

Inhomogeneous Performance Evaluation of a New Methodology for Fluctuating Target Adaptive Detection

Mohamed Bakry El Mashade

Dr. Mohamed Bakry El Mashade

Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering

El-AZHAR University

Egypt

Homepage

Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 107, 273-286, 2021

doi:10.2528/PIERC20110107 | Google Scholar

Abstract

The ideality of operating environment of radar systems is extremely scarce while the demand for these systems is growing at a rapid pace. Technology of adaptation is therefore of primary concern in the design of their future strategies. The difficulty in finding a solution based on a single adaptive algorithm to deal with diverse noise environments has led to the development of composite adaptive procedure. Therefore, fusion of particular decisions of the single adaptive variants through appropriate rules provides a better final detection. This paper is intended to analyze the fusion strategy of cell-averaging (CA), order statistics (OS) and trimmed-mean (TM) schemes in heterogeneous environments. The tested target and the spurious ones are assumed to follow χ²-distribution with two- and four-degrees of freedom in their fluctuations. A closed form processor performance is derived. The results show that for the heterogeneous operation, this approach is more realistic. Particularly in multi-target situations, it exhibits higher robustness than CA, OS, or TM architecture. Additionally, our results reveal that it exhibits a homogeneous performance outperforming that of the Neyman-Pearson (N-P) detector which is the yardstick in the world of adaptive detection.

Download Full Article (560) View Full Article volume

Citation

Copy Export

Mohamed Bakry El Mashade, "Inhomogeneous Performance Evaluation of a New Methodology for Fluctuating Target Adaptive Detection," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 107, 273-286, 2021.
doi:10.2528/PIERC20110107

References

1. El Mashade, M. B., "Monopulse detection analysis of the trimmed mean CFAR processor in nonhomogeneous situations," IEE Proc. Radar, Sonar Navig., Vol. 143, No. 2, 87-94, April 1996.
doi:10.1049/ip-rsn:19960324 Google Scholar

2. Wang, W. Q., Radar Systems: Technology, Principals and Applications, Nova Science Publishers, Inc, 2013.

3. Gerlach, K. and K. Gerlach, "Adaptive detection of range distributed targets," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 47, No. 7, July 1999. Google Scholar

4. El Mashade, M. B., "Performance analysis of OS structure of CFAR detectors in fluctuating target environments," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 2, 127-158, 2008.
doi:10.2528/PIERC08022807 Google Scholar

5. Machado-Fernandez, J. R. and N. Mojena-Hernandez, "Evaluation of CFAR detectors performance," ITECKNE, Vol. 14, No. 2, 170-178, December 2017.
doi:10.15332/iteckne.v14i2.1772 Google Scholar

6. Islam, Md. M. and M. Hossam-E-Haider, "Detection capability and CFAR loss under fluctuating targets of different swerling model for various gamma parameters in radar," International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), Vol. 9, No. 2, 90-93, 2018. Google Scholar

7. Ivkovic, D., B. Zrnic, and M. Andric, "Fusion CFAR detector in receiver of the software defined radar," Frequenz, Vol. 68, No. 3–4, 125-136, 2014. Google Scholar

8. Swerling, P., "Radar probability of detection for some additional fluctuating target cases," IEEE Transactions Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. AES-33, No. 2, 698-709, April 1997. This reference is included in chapter 2 of [2].
doi:10.1109/7.588492 Google Scholar

9. El Mashade, M. B., "Performance superiority of CA_TM model over N-P algorithm in detecting χ² fluctuating targets with four-degrees of freedom," Int. J. Systems, Control and Communications, Vol. 11, No. 1, 92-118, 2020.
doi:10.1504/IJSCC.2020.105395 Google Scholar

10. El Mashade, M. B., "Heterogeneous performance analysis of the new model of CFAR detectors for partially-correlated χ²-targets," Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1-17, February 2018.
doi:10.21629/JSEE.2018.01.01 Google Scholar