Vol. 104
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERM 115 [2023] PIERM 114 [2022] PIERM 113 [2022] PIERM 112 [2022] PIERM 111 [2022] PIERM 110 [2022] PIERM 109 [2022] PIERM 108 [2022] PIERM 107 [2022] PIERM 106 [2021] PIERM 105 [2021] PIERM 104 [2021] PIERM 103 [2021] PIERM 102 [2021] PIERM 101 [2021] PIERM 100 [2021] PIERM 99 [2021] PIERM 98 [2020] PIERM 97 [2020] PIERM 96 [2020] PIERM 95 [2020] PIERM 94 [2020] PIERM 93 [2020] PIERM 92 [2020] PIERM 91 [2020] PIERM 90 [2020] PIERM 89 [2020] PIERM 88 [2020] PIERM 87 [2019] PIERM 86 [2019] PIERM 85 [2019] PIERM 84 [2019] PIERM 83 [2019] PIERM 82 [2019] PIERM 81 [2019] PIERM 80 [2019] PIERM 79 [2019] PIERM 78 [2019] PIERM 77 [2019] PIERM 76 [2018] PIERM 75 [2018] PIERM 74 [2018] PIERM 73 [2018] PIERM 72 [2018] PIERM 71 [2018] PIERM 70 [2018] PIERM 69 [2018] PIERM 68 [2018] PIERM 67 [2018] PIERM 66 [2018] PIERM 65 [2018] PIERM 64 [2018] PIERM 63 [2018] PIERM 62 [2017] PIERM 61 [2017] PIERM 60 [2017] PIERM 59 [2017] PIERM 58 [2017] PIERM 57 [2017] PIERM 56 [2017] PIERM 55 [2017] PIERM 54 [2017] PIERM 53 [2017] PIERM 52 [2016] PIERM 51 [2016] PIERM 50 [2016] PIERM 49 [2016] PIERM 48 [2016] PIERM 47 [2016] PIERM 46 [2016] PIERM 45 [2016] PIERM 44 [2015] PIERM 43 [2015] PIERM 42 [2015] PIERM 41 [2015] PIERM 40 [2014] PIERM 39 [2014] PIERM 38 [2014] PIERM 37 [2014] PIERM 36 [2014] PIERM 35 [2014] PIERM 34 [2014] PIERM 33 [2013] PIERM 32 [2013] PIERM 31 [2013] PIERM 30 [2013] PIERM 29 [2013] PIERM 28 [2013] PIERM 27 [2012] PIERM 26 [2012] PIERM 25 [2012] PIERM 24 [2012] PIERM 23 [2012] PIERM 22 [2012] PIERM 21 [2011] PIERM 20 [2011] PIERM 19 [2011] PIERM 18 [2011] PIERM 17 [2011] PIERM 16 [2011] PIERM 14 [2010] PIERM 13 [2010] PIERM 12 [2010] PIERM 11 [2010] PIERM 10 [2009] PIERM 9 [2009] PIERM 8 [2009] PIERM 7 [2009] PIERM 6 [2009] PIERM 5 [2008] PIERM 4 [2008] PIERM 3 [2008] PIERM 2 [2008] PIERM 1 [2008]
2021-09-07
Aircraft Classification Method Based on EEMD and Multifractal Correlation
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 104, 159-170, 2021
Abstract
The research goal of low-resolution radar aircraft target classification is to analyze the category of the given low-resolution radar aircraft target echo. In existing solutions, the feature extraction methods based on rotating modulation spectrum have good performance, such as the complex cepstrum method, autocorrelation method, cycle diagram method, autoregressive model power spectrum method, and singular value decomposition method. Most of these methods are more complicated in calculations, and practical applications often require higher pulse frequencies and longer observation times, which are greatly restricted. In this paper, a classification method based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition and multifractal correlation (CMEEMDMFC) is proposed. The basic design idea is to obtain the intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) by using the signal decomposition ability of ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and select some components which are beneficial for improving the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for recombination. Then extract the corresponding multifractal correlation (MFC) features from the new signals for recognition. For verifying the validity of the model, a comparison model was selected to test on the same data set. Experimental results show that the proposed model performs well in classification accuracy.
Citation
Junyong Hu Qiusheng Li Qianli Zhang Jingran Su , "Aircraft Classification Method Based on EEMD and Multifractal Correlation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 104, 159-170, 2021.
doi:10.2528/PIERM21071202
http://www.jpier.org/PIERM/pier.php?paper=21071202
References

1. Long, T., Z. Liang, and Q. Liu, "Advanced technology of high-resolution radar: Target detection, tracking, imaging, and recognition," Science China Information Sciences, Vol. 62, No. 4, 2019.
doi:10.1007/s11432-018-9811-0

2. Yang, X., "Building detection from high-resolution polarimetric SAR images,", University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2017.

3. Zhang, G., R. Li, and D. Wang, "A review of low-resolution radar target classification methods," Digital Communication World, Vol. 5, 280, 2018.

4. Ding, J. and X. Zhang, "Jet engine modulation signatures of propeller aircraft in air-defense radar signals," Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), Vol. 3, 418-421, 2003.

5. Wang, B., "Study on classification of airplane targets based on micro-Doppler effect,", Xidian University, 2015.

6. Yang, W., et al., "Automatic feature extraction from insufficient JEM signals based on compressed sensing method," 2015 Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference, Vol. 2, 1-3, 2016.

7. Ebrahimi, S., et al., "Iris recognition system based on fractal dimensions using improved box counting," Journal of Information Science and Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 2, 275-290, 2018.

8. Silva, P. M. and J. B. Florindo, "Fractal measures of image local features: An application to texture recognition," Multimedia Tools and Applications, Vol. 80, 14213-14229, 2021.
doi:10.1007/s11042-020-10369-8

9. Ni, J., et al., "Target classification of low-resolution radar based on fractional brown feature," Modern Radar, Vol. 33, No. 6, 46-48, 2011.

10. Li, Q. and W. Xie, "Target classification with low-resolution surveillance radars based on multifractal features," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 45, 291-308, 2012.
doi:10.2528/PIERB12091509

11. Li, Q. and W. Xie, "Research on analysis of multifractal correlation characteristics of aircraft echoes and classification of targets in surveillance radars," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 54, 27-44, 2013.

12. Zhang, H., Q. Li, C. Rong, and X. Yuan, "Target classification with low-resolution radars based on multifractal features in fractional Fourier domain," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 79, 51-60, 2019.
doi:10.2528/PIERM18110503

13. Qu, Z., X. Mao, and C. Hou, "Radar signal recognition based on singular value entropy and fractal dimension," Systems Engineering and Electronics, Vol. 40, No. 2, 303-307, 2018.

14. Chen, C., et al., "A new method for sorting unknown radar emitter signal," Chinese Journal of Electronics, Vol. 23, No. 3, 499-502, 2014.

15. Huo, Y., Y. Fang, and X. Long, "Lightning electric field signals recognition based on EMD and fractal theory," Journal of Northwest Normal University (Natural Science), Vol. 55, No. 5, 33-38+50, 2019.

16. Wang, R., M. Xiang, and C. Li, "Denoising FMCW ladar signals via EEMD with singular spectrum constraint," IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 1-5, 2019.

17. Li, C., et al., "Fault diagnosis of rolling element bearing of correlation coefficient and arrangement entropy based on EEMD," Modular Machine Tool & Automatic Manufacturing Technique, Vol. 8, 1-4, 2020.

18. He, J. and J. Xu, "The multifractal spectrum of a sea clutter using a random walk model," Acta Oceanologica Sinica, Vol. 36, No. 9, 23-26, 2017.
doi:10.1007/s13131-017-1107-y

19. Guan, J., et al., "Multifractal correlation characteristic of real sea clutter and low-observable targets detection," Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, Vol. 32, No. 1, 54-61, 2010.
doi:10.3724/SP.J.1146.2008.00980

20. Wu, Z. and N. E. Huang, "Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: A noise-assisted data analysis method," Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1-41, 2009.
doi:10.1142/S1793536909000047

21. Zhang, Z., Y. Du, and W. Hu, "Waveform entropy-based target detection in HRRPs," Aeronautical Computing Technique, Vol. 6, 51-54, 2007.

22. Li, Q., H. Zhang, Q. Lu, and L. Wei, "Research on analysis of aircraft echo characteristics and classification of targets in low-resolution radars based on EEMD," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 68, 61-68, 2018.

23. Yang, H., Y. Cheng, and G. Li, "A denoising method for ship radiated noise based on Spearman variational mode decomposition, spatial-dependence recurrence sample entropy, improved wavelet threshold denoising, and Savitzky-Golay filter," Alexandria Engineering Journal, Vol. 60, No. 3, 3379-3400, 2021.
doi:10.1016/j.aej.2021.01.055

24. Zhang, H. and Q. Li, "Target classification based on multifractal features in fractional Fourier transform domain," Radar Science and Technology, Vol. 17, No. 6, 647-654, 2019.

25. Gerdan, D., A. Beyaz, and M. Vatandas, "Classification of apple varieties: Comparison of ensemble learning and naive bayes algorithms in H2O framework," Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, Vol. 37, No. 1, 9-16, 2020.

26. Rao, B., et al., "ACPred-Fuse: Fusing multi-view information improves the prediction of anticancer peptides," Briefings Bioinformatics, Vol. 21, No. 5, 1846-1855, 2020.
doi:10.1093/bib/bbz088

27. Lobo, J. M., A. Jiménez-Valverde, and R. Real, "AUC: A misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models," Global Ecology and Biogeography, Vol. 17, No. 2, 145-151, 2008.
doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x

28. Liu, S. and F. Zhang, "Multifractal evaluation and classification of 3-D jointed rock mass quality," Rock and Soil Mechanics, Vol. 7, 1116-1121, 2004.

29. Hu, J., Q. Li, Q. Zhang, and Y. Zhong, "Aircraft target classification method based on EEMD and multifractal," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 99, 223-231, 2021.
doi:10.2528/PIERM20101802

30. Zhang, H. and Q. Li, "Target classification with low-resolution radars based on multifractal correlation characteristics in fractional Fourier domain," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 94, 161-176, 2019.
doi:10.2528/PIERC19040702