2017-11-13
Unobservable Potentials to Explain a Quantum Eraser and a Delayed-Choice Experiment
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 62, 111-122, 2017
Abstract
We present a new explanation for a quantum eraser. Mathematical description of the traditional explanation needs quantum-superposition states. However, the phenomenon can be explained without quantum-superposition states by introducing unobservable potentials which can be identified as an indefinite metric vector. In addition, a delayed choice experiment can also be explained by the interference between the photons and unobservable potentials, which seems like an unreal long-range correlation beyond the causality.
Citation
Masahito Morimoto, "Unobservable Potentials to Explain a Quantum Eraser and a Delayed-Choice Experiment," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 62, 111-122, 2017.
doi:10.2528/PIERM17082201
References

1. Trimmer, J. D., "The present situation in quantum mechanics: A translation of Schrödinger's ``cat paradox'' paper," Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 124, 323-338, Oct. 1980.        Google Scholar

2. Einstein, A., B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, "Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?," Phys. Rev., Vol. 47, 777-780, May 1935.
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777        Google Scholar

3. Bohm, D., "A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ``hidden'' variables. I," Phys. Rev., Vol. 85, 166-179, Jan. 1952.
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.85.166        Google Scholar

4. Bohm, D., "A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ``hidden'' variables. II," Phys. Rev., Vol. 85, 180-193, Jan. 1952.
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.85.180        Google Scholar

5. Bell, J. S., "On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics," Rev. Mod. Phys., Vol. 38, 447-452, Jul. 1966.
doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.38.447        Google Scholar

6. Oriols, X. and J. Mompart, "Overview of bohmian mechanics," ArXiv e-prints, Jun. 2012.        Google Scholar

7. Pylkkänen, P., B. J. Hiley, and I. Pättiniemi, "Bohm’s approach and individuality," ArXiv e-prints, May 2014.        Google Scholar

8. Durr, D., S. Goldstein, T. Norsen, W. Struyve, and N. Zanghi, "Can Bohmian mechanics be made relativistic?," Royal Society of London Proceedings Series A, Vol. 470, 30699, Dec. 2013.
doi:10.1098/rspa.2013.0699        Google Scholar

9. Allori, V., S. Goldstein, R. Tumulka, and N. Zanghi, "Predictions and primitive ontology in quantum foundations: A study of examples," ArXiv e-prints, May 2012.        Google Scholar

10. Dennis, G., M. A. de Gosson, and B. J. Hiley, "Fermi’s ansatz and bohm’s quantum potential," Physics Letters A, Vol. 378, No. 3233, 2363-2366, 2014.
doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2014.05.020        Google Scholar

11. Aspect, A., P. Grangier, and G. Roger, "Experimental tests of realistic local theories via bell’s theorem," Physical Review Letters, Vol. 47, No. 7, 460, 1981.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.460        Google Scholar

12. Aspect, A., P. Grangier, and G. Roger, "Experimental realization of einstein-podolsky-rosen-bohm gedankenexperiment: A new violation of bell’s inequalities," Physical Review Letters, Vol. 49, No. 2, 91-94, 1982.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91        Google Scholar

13. Aspect, A., J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, "Experimental test of bell’s inequalities using time-varying analyzers," Physical Review Letters, Vol. 49, No. 25, 1804, 1982.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1804        Google Scholar

14. Morimoto, M., "Unobservable potentials to explain single photon and electron interference," Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, Vol. 14, No. 8, 4121-4132, 2017.
doi:10.1166/jctn.2017.6796        Google Scholar

15. Ehrenberg, W. and R. E. Siday, "The refractive index in electron optics and the principles of dynamics," Proceedings of the Physical Society, Section B, Vol. 62, No. 1, 8, 1949.
doi:10.1088/0370-1301/62/1/303        Google Scholar

16. Aharonov, Y. and D. Bohm, "Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory," Phys. Rev., Vol. 115, 485-491, Aug. 1959.
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.115.485        Google Scholar

17. Meis, C., "Vector potential quantization and the quantum vacuum," Physics Research International, Vol. 5, 2014.        Google Scholar

18. Yang, C. N. and R. L. Mills, "Conservation of isotopic spin and isotopic gauge invariance," Phys. Rev., Vol. 96, 191-195, Oct. 1954.
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.96.191        Google Scholar

19. Wu, T. T. and C. N. Yang, "Concept of nonintegrable phase factors and global formulation of gauge fields," Phys. Rev. D, Vol. 12, 3845-3857, Dec. 1975.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.12.3845        Google Scholar

20. Weinberg, S., "A model of leptons," Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 19, 1264-1266, Nov. 1967.        Google Scholar

21. Utiyama, R., "Invariant theoretical interpretation of interaction," Phys. Rev., Vol. 101, 1597-1607, Mar. 1956.
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.101.1597        Google Scholar

22. Rachel Hillmer, P. K., "A do-it-yourself quantum eraser," Scientific American, Vol. 5, 9095, 2007.        Google Scholar

23. Walborn, S. P., M. O. Terra Cunha, S. P’adua, and C. H. Monken, "Double-slit quantum eraser," Phys. Rev. A, Vol. 65, 033818, Feb. 2002.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.65.033818        Google Scholar

24. Handsteiner, J., A. S. Friedman, D. Rauch, J. Gallicchio, B. Liu, H. Hosp, J. Kofler, D. Bricher, M. Fink, C. Leung, A. Mark, H. T. Nguyen, I. Sanders, F. Steinlechner, R. Ursin, S. Wengerowsky, A. H. Guth, D. I. Kaiser, T. Scheidl, and A. Zeilinger, "Cosmic bell test: Measurement settings from milky way stars," Physical Review Letters, Vol. 118, 060401, Feb. 2017.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.060401        Google Scholar

25. Itzykson, C. and J. B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory, McGraw-Hill, 1985.

26. Loudon, R., The Quantum Theory of Light, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, 1983.

27. Einstein, A., "Zur elektrodynamik bewegter krper," Annalen der Physik, Vol. 322, No. 10, 891-921, 1905.
doi:10.1002/andp.19053221004        Google Scholar

28. Tonomura, A., T. Matsuda, J. Endo, T. Arii, and K. Mihama, "Direct observation of fine structure of magnetic domain walls by electron holography," Physical Review Letters, Vol. 44, 1430-1433, May 1980.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.1430        Google Scholar

29. Tonomura, A., H. Umezaki, T. Matsuda, N. Osakabe, J. Endo, and Y. Sugita, "Is magnetic flux quantized in a toroidal ferromagnet?," Physical Review Letters, Vol. 51, 331-334, Aug. 1983.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.331        Google Scholar

30. Salart, D., A. Baas, J. A. W. van Houwelingen, N. Gisin, and H. Zbinden, "Spacelike separation in a bell test assuming gravitationally induced collapses," Physical Review Letters, Vol. 100, 220404, Jun. 2008.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.220404        Google Scholar

31. Kim, Y.-H., R. Yu, S. P. Kulik, Y. Shih, and M. O. Scully, "Delayed ``choice'' quantum eraser," Physical Review Letters, Vol. 84, 1-5, Jan. 2000.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1        Google Scholar

32. Clauser, J. F. and M. A. Horne, "Experimental consequences of objective local theories," Physical Review D, Vol. 10, No. 2, 526, 1974.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.526        Google Scholar