volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

In this paper we revisit the condiagonalization of the Sinclair backscattering matrix, to overcome the Huynen decomposition issues, so as to correctly extract scatterer polarimetric properties. The correct extraction of scatterer polarimetric properties will lead to the correct classification of the scatterer predominant scattering mechanism. Huynen used the congruence transformation by a special unitary matrix to diagonalize the Sinclair matrix into a real and nonnegative diagonal matrix. He also expressed the special unitary matrix in terms of the polarization ellipse parameters and associated them with the scatterer orientation, asymmetry, and skip angle. Unfortunately, this association was found misleading. As a result, it makes the scatterer classification ambiguous, for it is based on the scatterer skip angle and the diagonal matrix. To overcome these ambiguities, we perform the diagonalization procedure founded on the consimilarity transformation by a special unitary matrix, as proposed by Lüneberg. In order to correctly extract the scatterer asymmetry degree and orientation, we express the special unitary matrix in terms of an asymmetry operation and a pure rotation operation. Moreover, we integrate the scatterer skip angle in the diagonal matrix of the consimilarity transformation by having it complex, leading to an unequivocal scatterer characterization.

1. Lee, J. S. and E. Pottier, Polarimetric Radar Imaging: From Basics to Applications, Taylor & Francis Group, CRC Press, 2009.

2. Lüneburg, E., S. R. Cloude, and W. M. Boerner, "On the proper polarimetric scattering matrix formulation of the forward propagation versus backscattering radar systems description," Proceedings on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1997. Google Scholar

3. Bebbington, D. and L. Carrea, "On mathematical and physical principles of transformations of the coherent radar backscatter matrix," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 50, No. 11, 4657-4669, November 2012.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2012.2191294 Google Scholar

4. Huynen, J. R., "Physical reality and mathematical process in radar polarimetry," 1991 Seventh International Conference on Antennas and Propagation, ICAP 91 (IEE), Vol. 1, 257-261, York, 1991. Google Scholar

5. Graves, C., "Radar polarization power scattering matrix," Proceedings of the IRE, Vol. 44, No. 2, 248-252, 1956.
doi:10.1109/JRPROC.1956.274912 Google Scholar

6. Boerner, W. M., W. L. Yan, A. Q. Xi, and Y. Yamaguchi, "On the basic principles of radar polarimetry: The target characteristic polarization state theory of Kennaugh, Huynen's polarization fork concept, and its extension to the partially polarized case," Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 79, No. 10, 1538-1550, 1991.
doi:10.1109/5.104228 Google Scholar

7. Cameron, W. L. and H. Rais, "Conservative polarimetric scatterers and their role in incorrect extensions of the Cameron decomposition," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Remote Sensing, Vol. 44, No. 12, 3506-3516, 2006.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2006.879115 Google Scholar

8. Titin-Schnaider, C., "Comparison between Huynen and Cameron monostatic parameters," Radio Science, Vol. 47, No. 4, 2012.
doi:10.1029/2011RS004876 Google Scholar

9. Dallmann, T. and D. Heberling, "On the coneigenvalue decomposition of Sinclair matrices," PIERS Proceedings, 2714-2718, Prague, Czech Republic, July 6-9, 2015. Google Scholar

10. Lüneberg, E., "Radar polarimetry: A revision of basic concepts," Direct and Indirect Methods in Scattering Theory, Gebze, Turkey, 1996. Google Scholar

11. Dallmann, T. and D. Heberling, "On the connection between Jones matrix and Sinclair matrix," PIERS Proceedings, 258-262, Prague, Czech Republic, July 6-9, 2015. Google Scholar

12. Cameron, W. L., N. N. Youssef, and L. K. Leung, "Simulated polarimetric signatures of primitive geometrical shapes," IEEE Transaction on Geoscience Remote Sensing, Vol. 34, No. 3, 793-803, 1996.
doi:10.1109/36.499784 Google Scholar

13. Cameron, W. L. and H. Rais, "Derivation of a signed Cameron decomposition asymmetry parameter and relationship of Cameron to Huynen decomposition parameters," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 49, No. 5, 1677-1688, 2011.
doi:10.1109/TGRS.2010.2090529 Google Scholar

14. Schneider, R., I. Hajnsek, H. Kimura, and J. S. Lee, "Comparison of orientation angle estimation methodes over coherent scatterers," EUSAR 2006 - 6th European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, Dresden, Germany, 2006. Google Scholar

15. Shlivinski, Y. and E. Heyman, "Physical models for polarimetric SAR analysis," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 56, No. 8, 2664-2672, 2008.
doi:10.1109/TAP.2008.927499 Google Scholar

16. Horn, R. A. and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, 2013.

17. Lüneberg, E., "Aspects of radar polarimetry," Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 2, 219-243, 2002. Google Scholar

Dr. Georgios Kouroupis

Dr. Vassilis Anastassopoulos