Vol. 158
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERC 162 [2025] PIERC 161 [2025] PIERC 160 [2025] PIERC 159 [2025] PIERC 158 [2025] PIERC 157 [2025] PIERC 156 [2025] PIERC 155 [2025] PIERC 154 [2025] PIERC 153 [2025] PIERC 152 [2025] PIERC 151 [2025] PIERC 150 [2024] PIERC 149 [2024] PIERC 148 [2024] PIERC 147 [2024] PIERC 146 [2024] PIERC 145 [2024] PIERC 144 [2024] PIERC 143 [2024] PIERC 142 [2024] PIERC 141 [2024] PIERC 140 [2024] PIERC 139 [2024] PIERC 138 [2023] PIERC 137 [2023] PIERC 136 [2023] PIERC 135 [2023] PIERC 134 [2023] PIERC 133 [2023] PIERC 132 [2023] PIERC 131 [2023] PIERC 130 [2023] PIERC 129 [2023] PIERC 128 [2023] PIERC 127 [2022] PIERC 126 [2022] PIERC 125 [2022] PIERC 124 [2022] PIERC 123 [2022] PIERC 122 [2022] PIERC 121 [2022] PIERC 120 [2022] PIERC 119 [2022] PIERC 118 [2022] PIERC 117 [2021] PIERC 116 [2021] PIERC 115 [2021] PIERC 114 [2021] PIERC 113 [2021] PIERC 112 [2021] PIERC 111 [2021] PIERC 110 [2021] PIERC 109 [2021] PIERC 108 [2021] PIERC 107 [2021] PIERC 106 [2020] PIERC 105 [2020] PIERC 104 [2020] PIERC 103 [2020] PIERC 102 [2020] PIERC 101 [2020] PIERC 100 [2020] PIERC 99 [2020] PIERC 98 [2020] PIERC 97 [2019] PIERC 96 [2019] PIERC 95 [2019] PIERC 94 [2019] PIERC 93 [2019] PIERC 92 [2019] PIERC 91 [2019] PIERC 90 [2019] PIERC 89 [2019] PIERC 88 [2018] PIERC 87 [2018] PIERC 86 [2018] PIERC 85 [2018] PIERC 84 [2018] PIERC 83 [2018] PIERC 82 [2018] PIERC 81 [2018] PIERC 80 [2018] PIERC 79 [2017] PIERC 78 [2017] PIERC 77 [2017] PIERC 76 [2017] PIERC 75 [2017] PIERC 74 [2017] PIERC 73 [2017] PIERC 72 [2017] PIERC 71 [2017] PIERC 70 [2016] PIERC 69 [2016] PIERC 68 [2016] PIERC 67 [2016] PIERC 66 [2016] PIERC 65 [2016] PIERC 64 [2016] PIERC 63 [2016] PIERC 62 [2016] PIERC 61 [2016] PIERC 60 [2015] PIERC 59 [2015] PIERC 58 [2015] PIERC 57 [2015] PIERC 56 [2015] PIERC 55 [2014] PIERC 54 [2014] PIERC 53 [2014] PIERC 52 [2014] PIERC 51 [2014] PIERC 50 [2014] PIERC 49 [2014] PIERC 48 [2014] PIERC 47 [2014] PIERC 46 [2014] PIERC 45 [2013] PIERC 44 [2013] PIERC 43 [2013] PIERC 42 [2013] PIERC 41 [2013] PIERC 40 [2013] PIERC 39 [2013] PIERC 38 [2013] PIERC 37 [2013] PIERC 36 [2013] PIERC 35 [2013] PIERC 34 [2013] PIERC 33 [2012] PIERC 32 [2012] PIERC 31 [2012] PIERC 30 [2012] PIERC 29 [2012] PIERC 28 [2012] PIERC 27 [2012] PIERC 26 [2012] PIERC 25 [2012] PIERC 24 [2011] PIERC 23 [2011] PIERC 22 [2011] PIERC 21 [2011] PIERC 20 [2011] PIERC 19 [2011] PIERC 18 [2011] PIERC 17 [2010] PIERC 16 [2010] PIERC 15 [2010] PIERC 14 [2010] PIERC 13 [2010] PIERC 12 [2010] PIERC 11 [2009] PIERC 10 [2009] PIERC 9 [2009] PIERC 8 [2009] PIERC 7 [2009] PIERC 6 [2009] PIERC 5 [2008] PIERC 4 [2008] PIERC 3 [2008] PIERC 2 [2008] PIERC 1 [2008]
2025-08-09
Engineering an Electronic Shark Deterrent System Based Acoustic and EM Waves
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 158, 187-196, 2025
Abstract
Acoustic/Electromagnetic (EM) waves are at the heart of numerous scientific tools and inventive technologies for plentiful state-of-the art applications. This study describes the design and implementation of a portable and effective acoustic/electromagnetic shark shield electronic system. In order to support the shark deterrent technologies, a double-layer printed circuit board (PCB) circuit that includes a signal generator, pulse width modulation, and power amplifier modules has been designed. The 4-ohm, 3-watts loudspeaker was used in the construction of the acoustic shark shield system as a radiation element, while the EM system uses two electrodes and a wire antenna to produce EM wave radiation. The suggested design has then been subjected to a numerical analysis using the Multisim live demonstration circuit simulator. Lastly, a comparison between the experimental and numerical results was made. According to the findings, maximum peak-to-peak pulse amplitude of nearly 100 V and 55 Hz frequency was attained in a zero-meter distance deterrent system. These values are reduced to 53.2 V at approximately 55 Hz in the case of an EM shark system and with an artificial saltwater tank at 2 m distance, while the obtained peak amplitude for the acoustic shark deterrent system achieved peak-to-peak pulse amplitude value of almost 120 V at 55 Hz.
Citation
Hesham Abd El-Hakim, Abdelrhman Ehab Ayad, Mahmoud Fathy Mahmoud, Hesham Abd Elhady Mohamed, and Mohamed Hussien Moharam, "Engineering an Electronic Shark Deterrent System Based Acoustic and EM Waves," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 158, 187-196, 2025.
doi:10.2528/PIERC25030101
References

1. Florida Museum, "Yearly worldwide shark attack summary," https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/shark-attacks/yearly-worldwide-summary.
doi:10.3411/col.12162046

2. Al-Zhrani, Saleha, Nada M. Bedaiwi, Intesar F. El-Ramli, Abeer Z. Barasheed, Ali Abduldaiem, Yas Al-Hadeethi, and Ahmad Umar, "Underwater optical communications: A brief overview and recent developments," Engineered Science, Vol. 16, No. 27, 146-186, 2021.
doi:10.30919/es8d574

3. Schirripa Spagnolo, Giuseppe, Lorenzo Cozzella, and Fabio Leccese, "Underwater optical wireless communications: Overview," Sensors, Vol. 20, No. 8, 2261, 2020.
doi:10.3390/s20082261

4. Aristi, D. P. Fitri, Herry Boesono, K. E. Prihantoko, and D. Y. Gautama, "Electro shield system applications on set gill net as efforts to preserve shark resources," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1025, No. 1, 012022, 2018.

5. Riley, Madeline, Corey J. A. Bradshaw, and Charlie Huveneers, "Long-range electric deterrents not as effective as personal deterrents for reducing risk of shark bite," ICES Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 79, No. 10, 2656-2666, 2022.
doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsac199

6. McPhee, Daryl Peter and Craig Blount, "Shark deterrents and detectors: Review of bather protection technologies," NSW Department of Primary Industries, St Leonards, 2015.
doi:10.1080/08920753.2014.942046

7. Kempster, Ryan M., Channing A. Egeberg, Nathan S. Hart, Laura Ryan, Lucille Chapuis, Caroline C. Kerr, Carl Schmidt, Charlie Huveneers, Enrico Gennari, Kara E. Yopak, Jessica J. Meeuwig, and Shaun P. Collin, "How close is too close? The effect of a non-lethal electric shark deterrent on white shark behaviour," PLoS One, Vol. 11, No. 7, e0157717, 2016.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157717

8. Hart, Nathan S. and Laura A. Ryan, "Rapid and cost-effective methods for assessing the effectiveness of personal electrical shark deterrent devices," Report to the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Shark Management Strategy, Vol. 33, 2-30, 2019.
doi:10.53637/ynlj8685

9. Clarke, Thomas M., Adam Barnett, Richard Fitzpatrick, Laura A. Ryan, Nathan S. Hart, Arnault R. G. Gauthier, Tracey B. Scott-Holland, and Charlie Huveneers, "Personal electric deterrents can reduce shark bites from the three species responsible for the most fatal interactions," Scientific Reports, Vol. 14, No. 1, 16307, 2024.
doi:10.1038/s41598-024-66679-6

10. Hutchison, Zoë L., Andrew B. Gill, Peter Sigray, Haibo He, and John W. King, "Anthropogenic electromagnetic fields (EMF) influence the behaviour of bottom-dwelling marine species," Scientific Reports, Vol. 10, No. 1, 4219, 2020.
doi:10.1038/s41598-020-60793-x

11. Huveneers, Charlie, Paul J. Rogers, Jayson M. Semmens, Crystal Beckmann, Alison A. Kock, Brad Page, and Simon D. Goldsworthy, "Effects of an electric field on white sharks: In situ testing of an electric deterrent," PLoS One, Vol. 8, No. 5, e62730, 2013.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062730

12. Gauthier, A. R. G., E. Chateauminois, M. G. Hoarau, J. Gadenne, E. Hoarau, S. Jaquemet, S. K. Whitmarsh, and C. Huveneers, "Variable response to electric shark deterrents in bull sharks, Carcharhinus leucas," Scientific Reports, Vol. 10, No. 1, 17869, 2020.
doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74799-y

13. Huveneers, Charlie, Sasha Whitmarsh, Madeline Thiele, Lauren Meyer, Andrew Fox, and Corey J. A. Bradshaw, "Effectiveness of five personal shark-bite deterrents for surfers," PeerJ, Vol. 6, e5554, 2018.
doi:10.7717/peerj.5554

14. El-Hakim, Hesham A., Abdelrhman Ehab Ayad, and Mahmoud Fathy Mahmoud, "Design of electronic shark shield system based on acoustic waves," https://iugrc.conferences.ekb.eg/paper?manu=9555,27 1247-IUGRC (R3), 2024.
doi:10.2528/pierb15111702

15. Popper, Arthur N. and Anthony D. Hawkins, "An overview of fish bioacoustics and the impacts of anthropogenic sounds on fishes," Journal of Fish Biology, Vol. 94, No. 5, 692-713, 2019.
doi:10.1111/jfb.13948

16. Butler, Julie M. and Karen P. Maruska, "Underwater noise impairs social communication during aggressive and reproductive encounters," Animal Behaviour, Vol. 164, 9-23, 2020.
doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.03.013

17. Chapuis, Lucille, Shaun P. Collin, Kara E. Yopak, Robert D. McCauley, Ryan M. Kempster, Laura A. Ryan, Carl Schmidt, Caroline C. Kerr, Enrico Gennari, Channing A. Egeberg, and Nathan S. Hart, "The effect of underwater sounds on shark behaviour," Scientific Reports, Vol. 9, No. 1, 6924, 2019.
doi:10.1038/s41598-019-43078-w

18. Poppelier, Tamar, Jana Bonsberger, Boris Woody Berkhout, Reneé Pollmanns, and Vera Schluessel, "Acoustic discrimination in the grey bamboo shark Chiloscyllium griseum," Scientific Reports, Vol. 12, No. 1, 6520, 2022.
doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10257-1

19. Butler, Jack, Jenni A. Stanley, and Mark J. Butler IV, "Underwater soundscapes in near-shore tropical habitats and the effects of environmental degradation and habitat restoration," Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, Vol. 479, 89-96, 2016.
doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2016.03.006

20. Erbe, Christine, Alec Duncan, and Kathleen J. Vigness-Raposa, "Introduction to sound propagation under water," Exploring Animal Behavior through Sound, Vol. 1, 185-216, 2022.
doi:10.1007/978-3-030-97540-1_6

21. Lim, Kyeonghee, Hunkyu Seo, Won Gi Chung, Hayoung Song, Myoungjae Oh, Seoung Young Ryu, Younhee Kim, and Jang-Ung Park, "Material and structural considerations for high-performance electrodes for wearable skin devices," Communications Materials, Vol. 5, No. 1, 49, 2024.
doi:10.1038/s43246-024-00490-8

22. Hayt, Jr., William H. and John A. Buck, Engineering Electromagnetics, 8th Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 2012.
doi:10.1063/1.3061617

23. Nyqvist, Daniel, Caroline Durif, Magnar Gullikstad Johnsen, Karen De Jong, Tonje Nesse Forland, and Lise Doksaeter Sivle, "Electric and magnetic senses in marine animals, and potential behavioral effects of electromagnetic surveys," Marine Environmental Research, Vol. 155, 104888, 2020.
doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104888