volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

Quantum repeaters are essential for long-distance quantum communication, surmounting challenges like signal attenuation and decoherence. Nonetheless, current quantum repeater networks are constrained by static cutoff times for low-fidelity connections, suboptimal resource allocation, and the absence of quantum-classical integration. This paper introduces a hybrid quantum-classical method to tackle these issues by employing dynamic cutoff times contingent upon real-time fidelity decay and decoherence rates. Markov Decision Process (MDP) is used to characterize the system with the aim to optimize the entanglement generation processes, waiting and swapping. In this study, the objective is to reduce the time which is needed to realize end-to-end entanglement while fulfilling the requirements of classical channel capacity. To manage constraints such as classical user demands, quantum memory limits, and network congestion, Lagrangian optimization has been applied. The combined approach improves the use of both classical resources and quantum, providing a simplified solution that is adaptable to different users needs and different network conditions. The effectiveness of the model is tested via simulations processes, along with the mathematical process. This demonstrated important gains in fidelity preservation, resource efficiency, and latency minimization compared to the state-of-the-art traditional methods. This study makes a valuable contribution tackling the development of quantum networks, providing a rigid establishment to build a quantum capable for internet to support the security in distributed quantum computing and global communications.

1. Munro, William J., Koji Azuma, Kiyoshi Tamaki, and Kae Nemoto, "Inside quantum repeaters," IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, Vol. 21, No. 3, 78-90, 2015.
doi:10.1109/jstqe.2015.2392076 Google Scholar

2. Briegel, H.-J., W. Dür, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, "Quantum repeaters: The role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication," Physical Review Letters, Vol. 81, No. 26, 5932, 1998.
doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5932 Google Scholar

3. Cao, Yuan, Yongli Zhao, Qin Wang, Jie Zhang, Soon Xin Ng, and Lajos Hanzo, "The evolution of quantum key distribution networks: On the road to the internet," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol. 24, No. 2, 839-894, 2022.
doi:10.1109/comst.2022.3144219 Google Scholar

4. Sidhu, Jasminder S., Thomas Brougham, Duncan McArthur, Roberto G. Pousa, and Daniel K. L. Oi, "Finite key performance of satellite quantum key distribution under practical constraints," Communications Physics, Vol. 6, No. 1, 210, Aug. 2023.
doi:10.1038/s42005-023-01299-6 Google Scholar

5. Sidhu, Jasminder S., Siddarth K. Joshi, Mustafa Gündoğan, Thomas Brougham, David Lowndes, Luca Mazzarella, Markus Krutzik, Sonali Mohapatra, Daniele Dequal, Giuseppe Vallone, et al., "Advances in space quantum communications," IET Quantum Communication, Vol. 2, No. 4, 182-217, 2021.
doi:10.1049/qtc2.12015 Google Scholar

6. Bhuyan, Amit Kumar and Hrishikesh Dutta, "Harnessing quantum entanglement: Comprehensive strategies for enhanced communication and beyond in quantum networks," arxiv preprint arxiv:2406.08833, 2024. Google Scholar

7. Abane, Amar, Michael Cubeddu, Van Sy Mai, and Abdella Battou, "Entanglement routing in quantum networks: A comprehensive survey," IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, Vol. 6, 1-39, 2025.
doi:10.1109/tqe.2025.3541123 Google Scholar

8. Vista, F., "Quantum-aided modeling and design techniques for advanced wireless network architectures," Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, Vol. 66, No. 5, 250301, 2024. Google Scholar

9. Al-Abbasi, Ziad Qais, Laith Farhan, and Raad S. Alhumaima, "Multiple-intelligent reflective surfaces (Multi-IRSs)-based NOMA system," Electronics, Vol. 11, No. 23, 4045, 2022.
doi:10.3390/electronics11234045 Google Scholar

10. Khalif, Basit N. A., Jawad A. K. Hasan, Raad S. Alhumaima, and Hamed S. Al-Raweshidy, "Performance analysis of quantum based cloud radio access networks," IEEE Access, Vol. 8, 18123-18133, 2019.
doi:10.1109/access.2019.2925902 Google Scholar

11. Alhumaima, Raad S., "Energy efficiency and latency analysis of fog networks," China Communications, Vol. 17, No. 4, 66-77, 2020.
doi:10.23919/jcc.2020.04.007 Google Scholar

12. Iñesta, Álvaro G., Gayane Vardoyan, Lara Scavuzzo, and Stephanie Wehner, "Optimal entanglement distribution policies in homogeneous repeater chains with cutoffs," Npj Quantum Information, Vol. 9, No. 1, 46, May 2023.
doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00713-9 Google Scholar

13. Li, Jan, Tim Coopmans, Patrick Emonts, Kenneth Goodenough, Jordi Tura, and Evert van Nieuwenburg, "Optimising entanglement distribution policies under classical communication constraints assisted by reinforcement learning," Machine Learning: Science and Technology, Vol. 6, No. 3, 035024, 2025.
doi:10.1088/2632-2153/adeefa Google Scholar

14. Da Silva, Francisco Ferreira, Ariana Torres-Knoop, Tim Coopmans, David Maier, and Stephanie Wehner, "Optimizing entanglement generation and distribution using genetic algorithms," Quantum Science and Technology, Vol. 6, No. 3, 035007, Jun. 2021.
doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abfc93 Google Scholar

15. Talsma, Lars, Álvaro G. Iñesta, and Stephanie Wehner, "Continuously distributing entanglement in quantum networks with regular topologies," Physical Review A, Vol. 110, No. 2, 022429, Aug. 2024.
doi:10.1103/physreva.110.022429 Google Scholar

16. Ghaderibaneh, Mohammad, Himanshu Gupta, C. R. Ramakrishnan, and Ertai Luo, "Pre-distribution of entanglements in quantum networks," 2022 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 426-436, Broomfield, CO, USA, Sep. 2022.
doi:10.1109/QCE53715.2022.00064

17. Iñesta, Álvaro G. and Stephanie Wehner, "Performance metrics for the continuous distribution of entanglement in multiuser quantum networks," Physical Review A, Vol. 108, No. 5, 052615, 2023.
doi:10.1103/physreva.108.052615 Google Scholar

18. Shchukin, E., F. Schmidt, and P. van Loock, "Waiting time in quantum repeaters with probabilistic entanglement swapping," Physical Review A, Vol. 100, No. 3, 032322, Sep. 2019.
doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032322 Google Scholar

19. Goodenough, Kenneth, Tim Coopmans, and Don Towsley, "On noise in swap ASAP repeater chains: Exact analytics, distributions and tight approximations," Quantum, Vol. 9, 1744, May 2025.
doi:10.22331/q-2025-05-15-1744 Google Scholar

20. Kolar, Alexander, Allen Zang, Joaquin Chung, Martin Suchara, and Rajkumar Kettimuthu, "Adaptive, continuous entanglement generation for quantum networks," IEEE INFOCOM 2022 --- IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 1-6, New York, NY, USA, May 2022.
doi:10.1109/INFOCOMWKSHPS54753.2022.9798130

21. Iñesta, Álvaro G., Hyeongrak Choi, Dirk Englund, and Stephanie Wehner, "Quantum circuit switching with one-way repeaters in star networks," 2024 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), Vol. 1, 1857-1867, Montreal, QC, Canada, Sep. 2024.
doi:10.1109/qce60285.2024.00215

22. Grant, E., "On the stochastic analysis of a quantum entanglement distribution switch," Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, Vol. 66, No. 5, 250301, 2023. Google Scholar

23. Zang, Allen, Xinan Chen, Alexander Kolar, Joaquin Chung, Martin Suchara, Tian Zhong, and Rajkumar Kettimuthu, "Entanglement distribution in quantum repeater with purification and optimized buffer time," IEEE INFOCOM 2023 --- IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 1-6, Hoboken, NJ, USA, May 2023.
doi:10.1109/INFOCOMWKSHPS57453.2023.10226122

24. Khatri, Sumeet, "On the design and analysis of near-term quantum network protocols using Markov decision processes," AVS Quantum Science, Vol. 4, No. 3, 030501, 2022.
doi:10.1116/5.0084653 Google Scholar

25. Coopmans, Tim, Sebastiaan Brand, and David Elkouss, "Improved analytical bounds on delivery times of long-distance entanglement," Physical Review A, Vol. 105, No. 1, 012608, 2022.
doi:10.1103/physreva.105.012608 Google Scholar

26. Haldar, Stav, Pratik J. Barge, Xiang Cheng, Kai-Chi Chang, Brian T. Kirby, Sumeet Khatri, Chee Wei Wong, and Hwang Lee, "Reducing classical communication costs in multiplexed quantum repeaters using hardware-aware quasi-local policies," Communications Physics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 132, Apr. 2025.
doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02029-w Google Scholar

27. Al-Nedawe, Basman M., Raad S. Alhumaima, and Wisam Hasan Ali, "On the quality of service of next generation green networks," IET Networks, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1-12, 2022.
doi:10.1049/ntw2.12030 Google Scholar

Dr. Omar Ali Mohammad

Dr. Jawad A. K. Hasan