Vol. 171
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERC 171 [2026] PIERC 170 [2026] PIERC 169 [2026] PIERC 168 [2026] PIERC 167 [2026] PIERC 166 [2026] PIERC 165 [2026] PIERC 164 [2026] PIERC 163 [2026] PIERC 162 [2025] PIERC 161 [2025] PIERC 160 [2025] PIERC 159 [2025] PIERC 158 [2025] PIERC 157 [2025] PIERC 156 [2025] PIERC 155 [2025] PIERC 154 [2025] PIERC 153 [2025] PIERC 152 [2025] PIERC 151 [2025] PIERC 150 [2024] PIERC 149 [2024] PIERC 148 [2024] PIERC 147 [2024] PIERC 146 [2024] PIERC 145 [2024] PIERC 144 [2024] PIERC 143 [2024] PIERC 142 [2024] PIERC 141 [2024] PIERC 140 [2024] PIERC 139 [2024] PIERC 138 [2023] PIERC 137 [2023] PIERC 136 [2023] PIERC 135 [2023] PIERC 134 [2023] PIERC 133 [2023] PIERC 132 [2023] PIERC 131 [2023] PIERC 130 [2023] PIERC 129 [2023] PIERC 128 [2023] PIERC 127 [2022] PIERC 126 [2022] PIERC 125 [2022] PIERC 124 [2022] PIERC 123 [2022] PIERC 122 [2022] PIERC 121 [2022] PIERC 120 [2022] PIERC 119 [2022] PIERC 118 [2022] PIERC 117 [2021] PIERC 116 [2021] PIERC 115 [2021] PIERC 114 [2021] PIERC 113 [2021] PIERC 112 [2021] PIERC 111 [2021] PIERC 110 [2021] PIERC 109 [2021] PIERC 108 [2021] PIERC 107 [2021] PIERC 106 [2020] PIERC 105 [2020] PIERC 104 [2020] PIERC 103 [2020] PIERC 102 [2020] PIERC 101 [2020] PIERC 100 [2020] PIERC 99 [2020] PIERC 98 [2020] PIERC 97 [2019] PIERC 96 [2019] PIERC 95 [2019] PIERC 94 [2019] PIERC 93 [2019] PIERC 92 [2019] PIERC 91 [2019] PIERC 90 [2019] PIERC 89 [2019] PIERC 88 [2018] PIERC 87 [2018] PIERC 86 [2018] PIERC 85 [2018] PIERC 84 [2018] PIERC 83 [2018] PIERC 82 [2018] PIERC 81 [2018] PIERC 80 [2018] PIERC 79 [2017] PIERC 78 [2017] PIERC 77 [2017] PIERC 76 [2017] PIERC 75 [2017] PIERC 74 [2017] PIERC 73 [2017] PIERC 72 [2017] PIERC 71 [2017] PIERC 70 [2016] PIERC 69 [2016] PIERC 68 [2016] PIERC 67 [2016] PIERC 66 [2016] PIERC 65 [2016] PIERC 64 [2016] PIERC 63 [2016] PIERC 62 [2016] PIERC 61 [2016] PIERC 60 [2015] PIERC 59 [2015] PIERC 58 [2015] PIERC 57 [2015] PIERC 56 [2015] PIERC 55 [2014] PIERC 54 [2014] PIERC 53 [2014] PIERC 52 [2014] PIERC 51 [2014] PIERC 50 [2014] PIERC 49 [2014] PIERC 48 [2014] PIERC 47 [2014] PIERC 46 [2014] PIERC 45 [2013] PIERC 44 [2013] PIERC 43 [2013] PIERC 42 [2013] PIERC 41 [2013] PIERC 40 [2013] PIERC 39 [2013] PIERC 38 [2013] PIERC 37 [2013] PIERC 36 [2013] PIERC 35 [2013] PIERC 34 [2013] PIERC 33 [2012] PIERC 32 [2012] PIERC 31 [2012] PIERC 30 [2012] PIERC 29 [2012] PIERC 28 [2012] PIERC 27 [2012] PIERC 26 [2012] PIERC 25 [2012] PIERC 24 [2011] PIERC 23 [2011] PIERC 22 [2011] PIERC 21 [2011] PIERC 20 [2011] PIERC 19 [2011] PIERC 18 [2011] PIERC 17 [2010] PIERC 16 [2010] PIERC 15 [2010] PIERC 14 [2010] PIERC 13 [2010] PIERC 12 [2010] PIERC 11 [2009] PIERC 10 [2009] PIERC 9 [2009] PIERC 8 [2009] PIERC 7 [2009] PIERC 6 [2009] PIERC 5 [2008] PIERC 4 [2008] PIERC 3 [2008] PIERC 2 [2008] PIERC 1 [2008]
2026-05-28
Discrete Space Vector Modulation Model Predictive Flux Control with Reformulated Incremental Cost Function and Efficient Search Strategy for SPMSM
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 171, 34-43, 2026
Abstract
Conventional model predictive flux control (C-MPFC) generates large steady-state ripples, and the system reference values are heavily dependent on the permanent magnet (PM) flux This paper proposes a discrete space vector modulation model predictive flux control with a reformulated incremental cost function and efficient search strategy (RDSVM-MPFC) for surface-mounted permanent magnet synchronous motors (SPMSMs). First, a unified cost function based on flux increments is reconstructed by redefining the d-axis reference flux. Second, the candidate set is expanded via discrete space vector modulation (DSVM) in the spatial flux increment plane to generate a set of virtual flux increment vectors (VFIVs), thereby significantly suppressing steady-state errors. Furthermore, to manage the heavy computation burden associated with the expanded VFIVs, a three-stage hierarchical optimization strategy is designed. This approach achieves rapid identification of the optimal control vector, which preserves the high steady-state precision while largely reducing the computational complexity of the system. Finally, experimental studies demonstrate that the proposed RDSVM-MPFC strategy eliminates sensitivity to PM flux variations and markedly suppresses steady-state pulsations.
Citation
Yang Zhang, Jiahao Zhang, Ping Yang, Wancheng Xie, and Shaoziyi Wu, "Discrete Space Vector Modulation Model Predictive Flux Control with Reformulated Incremental Cost Function and Efficient Search Strategy for SPMSM," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 171, 34-43, 2026.
doi:10.2528/PIERC26042201
References

1. Luo, Yixiao and Chunhua Liu, "Elimination of harmonic currents using a reference voltage vector based-model predictive control for a six-phase PMSM motor," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 34, No. 7, 6960-6972, Jul. 2019.
doi:10.1109/tpel.2018.2874893        Google Scholar

2. Ramesh, P. and N. C. Lenin, "High power density electrical machines for electric vehicles --- Comprehensive review based on material technology," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 55, No. 11, 1-21, Nov. 2019.
doi:10.1109/tmag.2019.2929145        Google Scholar

3. Navardi, Mohammad Javad, Jafar Milimonfared, and Heidar Ali Talebi, "Torque and flux ripples minimization of permanent magnet synchronous motor by a predictive-based hybrid direct torque control," IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1662-1670, Dec. 2018.
doi:10.1109/jestpe.2018.2834559        Google Scholar

4. Zhong, L., M. F. Rahman, W. Y. Hu, and K. W. Lim, "Analysis of direct torque control in permanent magnet synchronous motor drives," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 12, No. 3, 528-536, May 1997.
doi:10.1109/63.575680        Google Scholar

5. Alfaro, Carlos, Ramon Guzman, Luis Garcia de Vicuña, Jaume Miret, and Miguel Castilla, "Dual-loop continuous control set model-predictive control for a three-phase unity power factor rectifier," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 37, No. 2, 1447-1460, Feb. 2022.
doi:10.1109/tpel.2021.3107221        Google Scholar

6. Preindl, Matthias, "Robust control invariant sets and Lyapunov-based MPC for IPM synchronous motor drives," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 63, No. 6, 3925-3933, Jun. 2016.
doi:10.1109/tie.2016.2527722        Google Scholar

7. Yuan, Xin, Shuo Zhang, Chengning Zhang, Alessandro Galassini, Giampaolo Buticchi, and Michele Degano, "Improved model predictive current control for SPMSM drives using current update mechanism," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 68, No. 3, 1938-1948, Mar. 2021.
doi:10.1109/tie.2020.2973880        Google Scholar

8. Zhou, Zhanqing, Changliang Xia, Yan Yan, Zhiqiang Wang, and Tingna Shi, "Torque ripple minimization of predictive torque control for PMSM with extended control set," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 64, No. 9, 6930-6939, Sep. 2017.
doi:10.1109/tie.2017.2686320        Google Scholar

9. Davari, S. Alireza, Davood Arab Khaburi, and Ralph Kennel, "An improved FCS–MPC algorithm for an induction motor with an imposed optimized weighting factor," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1540-1551, Mar. 2012.
doi:10.1109/tpel.2011.2162343        Google Scholar

10. Zhang, Yongchang and Haitao Yang, "Model predictive torque control of induction motor drives with optimal duty cycle control," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 29, No. 12, 6593-6603, Dec. 2014.
doi:10.1109/tpel.2014.2302838        Google Scholar

11. Rojas, Christian A., Jose Rodriguez, Felipe Villarroel, José R. Espinoza, César A. Silva, and Mauricio Trincado, "Predictive torque and flux control without weighting factors," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 60, No. 2, 681-690, Feb. 2013.
doi:10.1109/tie.2012.2206344        Google Scholar

12. Villarroel, Felipe, José R. Espinoza, Christian A. Rojas, Jose Rodriguez, Marco Rivera, and Daniel Sbarbaro, "Multiobjective switching state selector for finite-states model predictive control based on fuzzy decision making in a matrix converter," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 60, No. 2, 589-599, Feb. 2013.
doi:10.1109/tie.2012.2206343        Google Scholar

13. Davari, Seyed Alireza, Davood Arab Khaburi, and Ralph Kennel, "Using a weighting factor table for FCS-MPC of induction motors with extended prediction horizon," IECON 2012 --- 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2086-2091, Montreal, QC, Canada, Oct. 2012.
doi:10.1109/IECON.2012.6388737

14. Cortes, Patricio, Samir Kouro, Bruno La Rocca, Rene Vargas, Jose Rodriguez, Jose I. Leon, Sergio Vazquez, and Leopoldo G. Franquelo, "Guidelines for weighting factors design in model predictive control of power converters and drives," 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, 1-7, Churchill, VIC, Australia, 2009.
doi:10.1109/ICIT.2009.4939742

15. Zheng, Zhihao and Dan Sun, "Model predictive flux control with cost function-based field weakening strategy for permanent magnet synchronous motor," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2151-2159, Feb. 2020.
doi:10.1109/tpel.2019.2921361        Google Scholar

16. Zhang, Yongchang, Haitao Yang, and Bo Xia, "Model-predictive control of induction motor drives: Torque control versus flux control," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 52, No. 5, 4050-4060, Sep.-Oct. 2016.
doi:10.1109/tia.2016.2582796        Google Scholar

17. Yan, Liming, Manfeng Dou, and Zhiguang Hua, "Disturbance compensation-based model predictive flux control of SPMSM with optimal duty cycle," IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1872-1882, Sep. 2019.
doi:10.1109/jestpe.2018.2859979        Google Scholar

18. Wang, Qiwei, Gaolin Wang, Nannan Zhao, Guoqiang Zhang, Qingwen Cui, and Dianguo Xu, "An impedance model-based multiparameter identification method of PMSM for both offline and online conditions," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 36, No. 1, 727-738, Jan. 2021.
doi:10.1109/tpel.2020.3000896        Google Scholar

19. Mousavi, Mahdi S., S. Alireza Davari, Vahab Nekoukar, Cristian Garcia, and Jose Rodriguez, "A robust torque and flux prediction model by a modified disturbance rejection method for finite-set model-predictive control of induction motor," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 36, No. 8, 9322-9333, Aug. 2021.
doi:10.1109/tpel.2021.3054242        Google Scholar

20. Huang, Shoudao, Gongping Wu, Fei Rong, Changfan Zhang, Sheng Huang, and Qiuwei Wu, "Novel predictive stator flux control techniques for PMSM drives," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 34, No. 9, 8916-8929, Sep. 2019.
doi:10.1109/tpel.2018.2884984        Google Scholar

21. Hou, Qiankang, Shihong Ding, and Xinghuo Yu, "Composite super-twisting sliding mode control design for PMSM speed regulation problem based on a novel disturbance observer," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2591-2599, Dec. 2021.
doi:10.1109/tec.2020.2985054        Google Scholar

22. Chen, Long, Hao Xu, Xiaodong Sun, and Yingfeng Cai, "Three-vector-based model predictive torque control for a permanent magnet synchronous motor of EVs," IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1454-1465, Sep. 2021.
doi:10.1109/tte.2021.3053256        Google Scholar

23. Gao, Liliang, John E. Fletcher, and Libo Zheng, "Low-speed control improvements for a two-level five-phase inverter-fed induction machine using classic direct torque control," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 58, No. 7, 2744-2754, Jul. 2011.
doi:10.1109/tie.2010.2070775        Google Scholar

24. Gu, Mingxing, Yong Yang, Mingdi Fan, Yang Xiao, Ping Liu, Xinan Zhang, Hui Yang, and Jose Rodriguez, "Finite control set model predictive torque control with reduced computation burden for PMSM based on discrete space vector modulation," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 38, No. 1, 703-712, Mar. 2023.
doi:10.1109/tec.2022.3211569        Google Scholar

25. Wang, Wusen, Chunhua Liu, Senyi Liu, and Hang Zhao, "Model predictive torque control for dual three-phase PMSMs with simplified deadbeat solution and discrete space-vector modulation," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 36, No. 2, 1491-1499, Jun. 2021.
doi:10.1109/tec.2021.3052132        Google Scholar

26. Wang, Yuanlin, Xiaocan Wang, Wei Xie, Fengxiang Wang, Manfeng Dou, Ralph M. Kennel, Robert D. Lorenz, and Dieter Gerling, "Deadbeat model-predictive torque control with discrete space-vector modulation for PMSM drives," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 64, No. 5, 3537-3547, May 2017.
doi:10.1109/tie.2017.2652338        Google Scholar

27. Osman, Ilham, Dan Xiao, Muhammed F. Rahman, Margarita Norambuena, and Jose Rodriguez, "Discrete space vector modulation based model predictive flux control with reduced switching frequency for IM drive," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 36, No. 2, 1357-1367, Jun. 2021.
doi:10.1109/tec.2020.3033356        Google Scholar