Vol. 165
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERC 166 [2026] PIERC 165 [2026] PIERC 164 [2026] PIERC 163 [2026] PIERC 162 [2025] PIERC 161 [2025] PIERC 160 [2025] PIERC 159 [2025] PIERC 158 [2025] PIERC 157 [2025] PIERC 156 [2025] PIERC 155 [2025] PIERC 154 [2025] PIERC 153 [2025] PIERC 152 [2025] PIERC 151 [2025] PIERC 150 [2024] PIERC 149 [2024] PIERC 148 [2024] PIERC 147 [2024] PIERC 146 [2024] PIERC 145 [2024] PIERC 144 [2024] PIERC 143 [2024] PIERC 142 [2024] PIERC 141 [2024] PIERC 140 [2024] PIERC 139 [2024] PIERC 138 [2023] PIERC 137 [2023] PIERC 136 [2023] PIERC 135 [2023] PIERC 134 [2023] PIERC 133 [2023] PIERC 132 [2023] PIERC 131 [2023] PIERC 130 [2023] PIERC 129 [2023] PIERC 128 [2023] PIERC 127 [2022] PIERC 126 [2022] PIERC 125 [2022] PIERC 124 [2022] PIERC 123 [2022] PIERC 122 [2022] PIERC 121 [2022] PIERC 120 [2022] PIERC 119 [2022] PIERC 118 [2022] PIERC 117 [2021] PIERC 116 [2021] PIERC 115 [2021] PIERC 114 [2021] PIERC 113 [2021] PIERC 112 [2021] PIERC 111 [2021] PIERC 110 [2021] PIERC 109 [2021] PIERC 108 [2021] PIERC 107 [2021] PIERC 106 [2020] PIERC 105 [2020] PIERC 104 [2020] PIERC 103 [2020] PIERC 102 [2020] PIERC 101 [2020] PIERC 100 [2020] PIERC 99 [2020] PIERC 98 [2020] PIERC 97 [2019] PIERC 96 [2019] PIERC 95 [2019] PIERC 94 [2019] PIERC 93 [2019] PIERC 92 [2019] PIERC 91 [2019] PIERC 90 [2019] PIERC 89 [2019] PIERC 88 [2018] PIERC 87 [2018] PIERC 86 [2018] PIERC 85 [2018] PIERC 84 [2018] PIERC 83 [2018] PIERC 82 [2018] PIERC 81 [2018] PIERC 80 [2018] PIERC 79 [2017] PIERC 78 [2017] PIERC 77 [2017] PIERC 76 [2017] PIERC 75 [2017] PIERC 74 [2017] PIERC 73 [2017] PIERC 72 [2017] PIERC 71 [2017] PIERC 70 [2016] PIERC 69 [2016] PIERC 68 [2016] PIERC 67 [2016] PIERC 66 [2016] PIERC 65 [2016] PIERC 64 [2016] PIERC 63 [2016] PIERC 62 [2016] PIERC 61 [2016] PIERC 60 [2015] PIERC 59 [2015] PIERC 58 [2015] PIERC 57 [2015] PIERC 56 [2015] PIERC 55 [2014] PIERC 54 [2014] PIERC 53 [2014] PIERC 52 [2014] PIERC 51 [2014] PIERC 50 [2014] PIERC 49 [2014] PIERC 48 [2014] PIERC 47 [2014] PIERC 46 [2014] PIERC 45 [2013] PIERC 44 [2013] PIERC 43 [2013] PIERC 42 [2013] PIERC 41 [2013] PIERC 40 [2013] PIERC 39 [2013] PIERC 38 [2013] PIERC 37 [2013] PIERC 36 [2013] PIERC 35 [2013] PIERC 34 [2013] PIERC 33 [2012] PIERC 32 [2012] PIERC 31 [2012] PIERC 30 [2012] PIERC 29 [2012] PIERC 28 [2012] PIERC 27 [2012] PIERC 26 [2012] PIERC 25 [2012] PIERC 24 [2011] PIERC 23 [2011] PIERC 22 [2011] PIERC 21 [2011] PIERC 20 [2011] PIERC 19 [2011] PIERC 18 [2011] PIERC 17 [2010] PIERC 16 [2010] PIERC 15 [2010] PIERC 14 [2010] PIERC 13 [2010] PIERC 12 [2010] PIERC 11 [2009] PIERC 10 [2009] PIERC 9 [2009] PIERC 8 [2009] PIERC 7 [2009] PIERC 6 [2009] PIERC 5 [2008] PIERC 4 [2008] PIERC 3 [2008] PIERC 2 [2008] PIERC 1 [2008]
2026-02-06
A Parallel Block Splitting FFT Method for Efficient Computation of Electromagnetic Scattering from Time-Varying Sea Surface
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 165, 276-283, 2026
Abstract
2-D Fast Fourier transform (FFT) is the most time-consuming step for modeling of time-varying sea surface using high-order small slope approximation (SSA). In this paper, a parallel block splitting method is proposed to accelerate 2D FFT calculation. The whole 2-D FFT matrix is divided into m × n blocks, and the traditional 2-D FFT is applied to each block in parallel. Finally, the complete FFT result can be obtained by using the message passing interface (MPI) for data communication and superimposing phase factors. This method can effectively reduce the communication overhead by combining symmetric domain decomposition and is more suitable than traditional parallel libraries. Accordingly, both generations of sea surface and computation of scattering using SSA can be accelerated. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed method exhibits strong scalability. Under a four-node configuration, the parallel efficiency of sea surface generation reaches 61.2%, while the second-order SSA parallel efficiency achieves 80.7%. This effectively resolves low-efficiency issues in large-scale sea surface generation and serial SSA computations.
Citation
Zhiwei Liu, Feng Xia, Rui Wang, and Xiao-Yan Zhang, "A Parallel Block Splitting FFT Method for Efficient Computation of Electromagnetic Scattering from Time-Varying Sea Surface," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 165, 276-283, 2026.
doi:10.2528/PIERC25121502
References

1. Mainvis, Aymeric, Vincent Fabbro, Christophe Bourlier, and Henri-Jose Mametsa, "Spectral decomposition method for large sea surface generation and radar backscatter modeling," Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, Vol. 124, No. 12, 8505-8521, 2019.
doi:10.1029/2018jc014070        Google Scholar

2. Li, Dongfang, Zilan Han, Yong Zhang, Yuan Huang, Wenying Ma, Yajuan Xue, and Zhiqin Zhao, "A fast method for simulating electromagnetic scattering from sea surface," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 23, No. 12, 4413-4417, 2024.
doi:10.1109/lawp.2024.3450108        Google Scholar

3. Hall, A. R., "Generalized method of moments," A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics, 230-255, Chapter 11, Wiley, 2003.
doi:10.1002/9780470996249.ch12        Google Scholar

4. Teixeira, F. L., C. Sarris, Y. Zhang, D.-Y. Na, J.-P. Berenger, Y. Su, M. Okoniewski, W. C. Chew, V. Backman, and J. J. Simpson, "Finite-Difference Time-Domain methods," Nature Reviews Methods Primers, Vol. 3, No. 1, 75, 2023.
doi:10.1038/s43586-023-00257-4        Google Scholar

5. Chou, Hsi-Tseng and Joel T. Johnson, "A novel acceleration algorithm for the computation of scattering from rough surfaces with the forward-backward method," Radio Science, Vol. 33, No. 5, 1277-1287, 1998.
doi:10.1029/98rs01888        Google Scholar

6. Holmes, Mark H., Introduction to Perturbation Methods, Vol. 20, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5347-1

7. Thorsos, Eric I., "The validity of the Kirchhoff approximation for rough surface scattering using a Gaussian roughness spectrum," The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 83, No. 1, 78-92, 1988.
doi:10.1121/1.396188        Google Scholar

8. Afifi, Saddek and Richard Dusséaux, "Scattering from 2-D perfect electromagnetic conductor rough surface: Analysis with the small perturbation method and the small-slope approximation," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 66, No. 1, 340-346, 2018.
doi:10.1109/tap.2017.2772027        Google Scholar

9. Thorsos, Eric I. and Shira Lynn Broschat, "An investigation of the small slope approximation for scattering from rough surfaces. Part I. Theory," The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 97, No. 4, 2082-2093, 1995.
doi:10.1121/1.412001        Google Scholar

10. Guérin, Charles-Antoine and Joel T. Johnson, "A simplified formulation for rough surface cross-polarized backscattering under the second-order small-slope approximation," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 53, No. 11, 6308-6314, 2015.
doi:10.1109/tgrs.2015.2440443        Google Scholar

11. Frigo, Matteo and Steven G. Johnson, "FFTW: Fastest Fourier transform in the west," Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl-1201, 2012.        Google Scholar

12. Wang, Endong, Qing Zhang, Bo Shen, Guangyong Zhang, Xiaowei Lu, Qing Wu, and Yajuan Wang, Intel math kernel library, 167-188, Springer, 2014.
doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06486-4_7

13. Wang, Cheng, Sunita Chandrasekaran, and Barbara Chapman, "cusFFT: A high-performance sparse fast Fourier transform algorithm on GPUs," 2016 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS), 963-972, Chicago, IL, USA, 2016.
doi:10.1109/IPDPS.2016.95

14. Scarpino, Matthew, OpenCL in Action: How to Accelerate Graphics and Computations, Simon and Schuster, 2011.

15. Koopman, Thomas and Rob H. Bisseling, "Minimizing communication in the multidimensional FFT," SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol. 45, No. 6, C330-C347, 2023.
doi:10.1137/22m1487242        Google Scholar

16. Cayrols, S´ebastien, Jiali Li, George Bosilca, Stanimire Tomov, Alan Ayala, and Jack Dongarra, Mixed precision and approximate 3D FFTs: Speed for accuracy trade-off with GPU-aware MPI and run-time data compression, 2022.

17. Wang, Lu, Lixin Guo, and Xiao Meng, "Research on electromagnetic scattering characteristics of Kelvin wake of ship based on MPI," 2018 12th International Symposium on Antennas, Propagation and EM Theory (ISAPE), 1-4, Hangzhou, China, 2018.
doi:10.1109/ISAPE.2018.8634057

18. Jiang, Wang-Qiang, Min Zhang, Peng-Bo Wei, and Xiao-Feng Yuan, "CUDA-based SSA method in application to calculating EM scattering from large two-dimensional rough surface," IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1372-1382, 2014.
doi:10.1109/jstars.2014.2303494        Google Scholar

19. Voronovich, A. G., "The effect of the modulation of Braggscattering in small-slope approximation," Waves in Random Media, Vol. 12, No. 3, 341, 2002.
doi:10.1088/0959-7174/12/3/306        Google Scholar

20. Wang, Jianing and Xiaojian Xu, "A domain decomposition based technique for 2-D sea surface generation," 2013 6th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP), 809-813, Hangzhou, China, 2013.
doi:10.1109/CISP.2013.6745276