Vol. 167
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIERC 167 [2026] PIERC 166 [2026] PIERC 165 [2026] PIERC 164 [2026] PIERC 163 [2026] PIERC 162 [2025] PIERC 161 [2025] PIERC 160 [2025] PIERC 159 [2025] PIERC 158 [2025] PIERC 157 [2025] PIERC 156 [2025] PIERC 155 [2025] PIERC 154 [2025] PIERC 153 [2025] PIERC 152 [2025] PIERC 151 [2025] PIERC 150 [2024] PIERC 149 [2024] PIERC 148 [2024] PIERC 147 [2024] PIERC 146 [2024] PIERC 145 [2024] PIERC 144 [2024] PIERC 143 [2024] PIERC 142 [2024] PIERC 141 [2024] PIERC 140 [2024] PIERC 139 [2024] PIERC 138 [2023] PIERC 137 [2023] PIERC 136 [2023] PIERC 135 [2023] PIERC 134 [2023] PIERC 133 [2023] PIERC 132 [2023] PIERC 131 [2023] PIERC 130 [2023] PIERC 129 [2023] PIERC 128 [2023] PIERC 127 [2022] PIERC 126 [2022] PIERC 125 [2022] PIERC 124 [2022] PIERC 123 [2022] PIERC 122 [2022] PIERC 121 [2022] PIERC 120 [2022] PIERC 119 [2022] PIERC 118 [2022] PIERC 117 [2021] PIERC 116 [2021] PIERC 115 [2021] PIERC 114 [2021] PIERC 113 [2021] PIERC 112 [2021] PIERC 111 [2021] PIERC 110 [2021] PIERC 109 [2021] PIERC 108 [2021] PIERC 107 [2021] PIERC 106 [2020] PIERC 105 [2020] PIERC 104 [2020] PIERC 103 [2020] PIERC 102 [2020] PIERC 101 [2020] PIERC 100 [2020] PIERC 99 [2020] PIERC 98 [2020] PIERC 97 [2019] PIERC 96 [2019] PIERC 95 [2019] PIERC 94 [2019] PIERC 93 [2019] PIERC 92 [2019] PIERC 91 [2019] PIERC 90 [2019] PIERC 89 [2019] PIERC 88 [2018] PIERC 87 [2018] PIERC 86 [2018] PIERC 85 [2018] PIERC 84 [2018] PIERC 83 [2018] PIERC 82 [2018] PIERC 81 [2018] PIERC 80 [2018] PIERC 79 [2017] PIERC 78 [2017] PIERC 77 [2017] PIERC 76 [2017] PIERC 75 [2017] PIERC 74 [2017] PIERC 73 [2017] PIERC 72 [2017] PIERC 71 [2017] PIERC 70 [2016] PIERC 69 [2016] PIERC 68 [2016] PIERC 67 [2016] PIERC 66 [2016] PIERC 65 [2016] PIERC 64 [2016] PIERC 63 [2016] PIERC 62 [2016] PIERC 61 [2016] PIERC 60 [2015] PIERC 59 [2015] PIERC 58 [2015] PIERC 57 [2015] PIERC 56 [2015] PIERC 55 [2014] PIERC 54 [2014] PIERC 53 [2014] PIERC 52 [2014] PIERC 51 [2014] PIERC 50 [2014] PIERC 49 [2014] PIERC 48 [2014] PIERC 47 [2014] PIERC 46 [2014] PIERC 45 [2013] PIERC 44 [2013] PIERC 43 [2013] PIERC 42 [2013] PIERC 41 [2013] PIERC 40 [2013] PIERC 39 [2013] PIERC 38 [2013] PIERC 37 [2013] PIERC 36 [2013] PIERC 35 [2013] PIERC 34 [2013] PIERC 33 [2012] PIERC 32 [2012] PIERC 31 [2012] PIERC 30 [2012] PIERC 29 [2012] PIERC 28 [2012] PIERC 27 [2012] PIERC 26 [2012] PIERC 25 [2012] PIERC 24 [2011] PIERC 23 [2011] PIERC 22 [2011] PIERC 21 [2011] PIERC 20 [2011] PIERC 19 [2011] PIERC 18 [2011] PIERC 17 [2010] PIERC 16 [2010] PIERC 15 [2010] PIERC 14 [2010] PIERC 13 [2010] PIERC 12 [2010] PIERC 11 [2009] PIERC 10 [2009] PIERC 9 [2009] PIERC 8 [2009] PIERC 7 [2009] PIERC 6 [2009] PIERC 5 [2008] PIERC 4 [2008] PIERC 3 [2008] PIERC 2 [2008] PIERC 1 [2008]
2026-03-06
Optimized Hierarchical Nested Array for Enhanced Uniform Degrees of Freedom in Sparse Array DOA Estimation
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 167, 21-31, 2026
Abstract
Sparse arrays have been extensively investigated for their capability to enhance degrees of freedom (DOFs). However, conventional nested array configuration is susceptible to strong mutual coupling (MC), while its achievable uniform DOFs (uDOFs) remains limited. To address these challenges, this paper proposes two optimized hierarchical nested arrays, designated as OHNA-I and OHNA-II. OHNA-I reconstructs the spatial arrangement of subarrays through a hierarchical shifting operation, effectively extending the continuous segment of the difference co-array (DCA). Building on this, OHNA-II further optimizes the subarray geometry via sensor displacement, achieving a better balance between uDOF enhancement and MC suppression, thereby maintaining higher uDOFs while reducing inter-sensor coupling interference. Numerical simulation results demonstrate that, under the same number of physical sensors, the proposed structures - particularly OHNA-II - achieve a greater number of uDOFs than existing classical sparse arrays. Furthermore, in scenarios with strong MC, the proposed structure exhibits superior robustness and lower root mean square error (RMSE) in DOA estimation.
Citation
Guibao Wang, Keyi Yu, Xianghui Wang, and Shuzhen Wang, "Optimized Hierarchical Nested Array for Enhanced Uniform Degrees of Freedom in Sparse Array DOA Estimation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 167, 21-31, 2026.
doi:10.2528/PIERC25120702
References

1. Ling, Yun, Huotao Gao, Sang Zhou, Lijuan Yang, and Fangyu Ren, "Robust sparse Bayesian learning-based off-grid DOA estimation method for vehicle localization," Sensors, Vol. 20, No. 1, 302, Jan. 2020.
doi:10.3390/s20010302        Google Scholar

2. Sun, Haochen, Yifan Liu, Ahmed Al-Tahmeesschi, Avishek Nag, Mohadeseh Soleimanpour, Berk Canberk, Huseyin Arslan, and Hamed Ahmadi, "Advancing 6G: Survey for explainable AI on communications and network slicing," IEEE Open Journal of The Communications Society, Vol. 6, 1372-1412, 2025.
doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2025.3534626        Google Scholar

3. Shi, Junpeng, Zai Yang, and Yongxiang Liu, "On parameter identifiability of diversity-smoothing-based MIMO radar," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 58, No. 3, 1660-1675, Jun. 2022.
doi:10.1109/taes.2021.3126370        Google Scholar

4. Moffet, A., "Minimum-redundancy linear arrays," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 16, No. 2, 172-175, Mar. 1968.
doi:10.1109/tap.1968.1139138        Google Scholar

5. Pal, Piya and P. P. Vaidyanathan, "Nested arrays: A novel approach to array processing with enhanced degrees of freedom," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 58, No. 8, 4167-4181, Aug. 2010.
doi:10.1109/tsp.2010.2049264        Google Scholar

6. Vaidyanathan, Palghat P. and Piya Pal, "Sparse sensing with co-prime samplers and arrays," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 59, No. 2, 573-586, Feb. 2011.
doi:10.1109/tsp.2010.2089682        Google Scholar

7. Qin, Si, Yimin D. Zhang, and Moeness G. Amin, "Generalized coprime array configurations for direction-of-arrival estimation," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 63, No. 6, 1377-1390, Mar. 2015.
doi:10.1109/tsp.2015.2393838        Google Scholar

8. Raza, Ahsan, Wei Liu, and Qing Shen, "Thinned coprime array for second-order difference co-array generation with reduced mutual coupling," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 67, No. 8, 2052-2065, Apr. 2019.
doi:10.1109/tsp.2019.2901380        Google Scholar

9. Zheng, Wang, Xiaofei Zhang, Yunfei Wang, Jinqing Shen, and Benoit Champagne, "Padded coprime arrays for improved DOA estimation: Exploiting hole representation and filling strategies," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 68, 4597-4611, 2020.
doi:10.1109/tsp.2020.3013389        Google Scholar

10. Liu, Jianyan, Yanmei Zhang, Yilong Lu, Shiwei Ren, and Shan Cao, "Augmented nested arrays with enhanced DOF and reduced mutual coupling," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 65, No. 21, 5549-5563, Nov. 2017.
doi:10.1109/tsp.2017.2736493        Google Scholar

11. Shaalan, Ahmed M. A., Jun Du, and Yan-Hui Tu, "Dilated nested arrays with more degrees of freedom (DOFs) and less mutual coupling --- Part I: The fundamental geometry," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 70, 2518-2531, 2022.
doi:10.1109/tsp.2022.3174451        Google Scholar

12. Zhang, Yule, Guoping Hu, Hao Zhou, Juan Bai, Chenghong Zhan, and Shuhan Guo, "Hole-free nested array with three sub-ULAs for direction of arrival estimation," Sensors, Vol. 23, No. 11, 5214, 2023.
doi:10.3390/s23115214        Google Scholar

13. Wei, Shuang, Gencun Zhu, and Ying Su, "A novel sparse array configuration for direction of arrival estimation with increased uniform degrees of freedom and reduced mutual coupling," Sensors, Vol. 24, No. 3, 808, Jan. 2024.
doi:10.3390/s24030808        Google Scholar

14. Wandale, Steven and Koichi Ichige, "A generalized extended nested array design via maximum inter-element spacing criterion," IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 30, 31-35, 2023.
doi:10.1109/lsp.2023.3238912        Google Scholar

15. Wang, Xiuwen, Lei Zhao, and Yuan Jiang, "Super augmented nested arrays: A new sparse array for improved DOA estimation accuracy," IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 31, 26-30, 2024.
doi:10.1109/lsp.2023.3340599        Google Scholar

16. Friedlander, B. and A. J. Weiss, "Direction finding in the presence of mutual coupling," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 39, No. 3, 273-284, Mar. 1991.
doi:10.1109/8.76322        Google Scholar

17. Liu, Chun-Lin and P. P. Vaidyanathan, "Super nested arrays: Linear sparse arrays with reduced mutual coupling --- Part I: Fundamentals," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 64, No. 15, 3997-4012, Aug. 2016.
doi:10.1109/tsp.2016.2558159        Google Scholar

18. Wang, Min, Xiaochuan Ma, Shefeng Yan, and Chengpeng Hao, "An autocalibration algorithm for uniform circular array with unknown mutual coupling," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 15, 12-15, 2015.
doi:10.1109/lawp.2015.2425423        Google Scholar

19. Chen, Hua, Hongguang Lin, Wei Liu, Qing Wang, Qing Shen, and Gang Wang, "Augmented multi-subarray dilated nested array with enhanced degrees of freedom and reduced mutual coupling," IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 72, 1387-1399, 2024.
doi:10.1109/tsp.2024.3374557        Google Scholar

20. Lai, Xin, Xiaofei Zhang, Wang Zheng, Jianfeng Li, and Fuhui Zhou, "Fragmented coprime arrays with optimal inter subarray spacing for DOA estimation: Increased DOF and reduced mutual coupling," Signal Processing, Vol. 215, 109273, Feb. 2024.
doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2023.109273        Google Scholar

21. Qi, Chongying, Yongliang Wang, Yongshun Zhang, and Ying Han, "Spatial difference smoothing for DOA estimation of coherent signals," IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol. 12, No. 11, 800-802, Nov. 2005.
doi:10.1109/lsp.2005.856866        Google Scholar