volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

In the forward modeling of the transient electromagnetic (TEM) method, a frequency-domain solution is usually obtained first, and the solution in the time domain is then calculated by a frequency-time transformation. At present, the three main fast frequency-time transformation methods are the Guptasarma algorithm, the sine and cosine numerical filtering algorithms, and the Gaver-Stehfest (G-S) algorithm. In recent years, with the increasing demand for fine detection at shallow depths, the small-loop TEM method has undergone rapid development. It is therefore important to evaluate whether the traditional forward modeling approaches can be directly applied to the small-loop method. In this paper, the principles of the three forward modeling methods and their limitations when being applied to the small-loop TEM method are discussed. Through a comparison with the analytical solution for a uniform half-space, we demonstrate that the accuracy of forward numerical calculation is affected by loop size and earth resistivity. When the Guptasarma, G-S, and cosine numerical filtering algorithms are used for small-loop TEM forward calculation, the overall calculation error becomes non-negligible, whereas the sine numerical filtering algorithm retains a high calculation accuracy. By studying the response of the frequency-domain solution, we analyze the cause of the error in the forward calculation. Generally, the sine numerical filtering algorithm is the most suitable method for fast and high-precision small-loop TEM forward modeling. The results obtained here should provide a foundation for high-precision forward modeling and inversion of the small-loop TEM method.

1. Auken, E., T. Boesen, and A. V. Christiansen, "A review of airborne electromagnetic methods with focus on geotechnical and hydrological applications from 2007 to 2017," Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 58, 47-93, 2017.
doi:10.1016/bs.agph.2017.10.002 Google Scholar

2. Nabighian, M. N., "Quasi-static transient response of a conducting half-space: An approximate representation," Geophysics, Vol. 44, No. 10, 1700, 1979.
doi:10.1190/1.1440931 Google Scholar

3. Ali, M. T., E. Slob, and W. Mulder, "Quasi-analytical method for frequency-to-time conversion in CSEM applications," Geophysics, Vol. 77, No. 5, 357-363, 2012.
doi:10.1190/geo2011-0432.1 Google Scholar

4. Knight, J. H. and A. P. Raiche, "Transient electromagnetic calculations using the Gaver Stehfest inverse Laplace transform method," Geophysics, Vol. 47, No. 1, 47-50, 1982.
doi:10.1190/1.1441280 Google Scholar

5. Raiche, A. P., "Transient electromagnetic field computations for polygonal loops on layered earths," Geophysics, Vol. 52, No. 6, 785-793, 1987.
doi:10.1190/1.1442345 Google Scholar

6. Luo, Y. Z. and Y. J. Chang, "A rapid algorithm for G-S transform," Chinese Journal of Geophysics, Vol. 43, No. 5, 724-730, 2000.
doi:10.1002/cjg2.87 Google Scholar

7. Li, F. P. and H. Y. Yang, "Comparison of several frequency time transformation methods for TEM forward modeling," Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, Vol. 40, No. 4, 743-749, 2016. Google Scholar

8. Kaufman, A. A. and G. V. Keller, Frequency and Transient Soundings (in Chinese), Wang J Translate Beijing, Ecological Publishing House, 1987.

9. Li, H., Z. Q. Zhu, and S. H. Zeng, "Progress of forward computation in transient electromagnetic method," Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), Vol. 27, No. 4, 1393-1400, 2012. Google Scholar

10. Guptasarma, D., "Computation of the time-domain response of a polarizable ground," Geophysics, Vol. 47, No. 1, 1574-1576, 1982.
doi:10.1190/1.1441307 Google Scholar

11. Ruan, B. Y., "Application of Guptasarma algorithm m transient electromagnetic method forward calculation," Journal of Guilin Institute of Technology (in Chinese), Vol. 16, No. 2, 167-170, 1996. Google Scholar

12. Metwaly, M., G. El-Qady, and U. Massoud, "Integrated geoelectrical survey for groundwater and shallow subsurface evaluation: Case study at Siliyin spring, El-Fayoum, Egypt," International Journal of Earth Ences, Vol. 99, No. 6, 1427-1436, 2010. Google Scholar

13. Chang, J., B. Su, R. Malekian, and X. J. Xing, "Detection of water-filled mining goaf using mining transient electromagnetic method," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2977-2984, 2020.
doi:10.1109/TII.2019.2901856 Google Scholar

14. Auken, E., N. Foged, J. J. Lassen, K. V. T. Lassen, P. K. Maurya, S. M. Dath, and T. T. Eiskjar, "tTEM — A towed transient electromagnetic system for detailed 3D imaging of the top 70m of the subsurface," Geophysics, Vol. 84, No. 1, 13-22, 2019.
doi:10.1190/geo2018-0355.1 Google Scholar

15. Niu, Z. L., The Theory of Time-Domain Electromagnetic Method (in Chinese), Central South University Press, 2007.

16. Guptasarma, D. and B. Singh, "New digital linear filters for Hankel J0 and J1 transforms," Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 45, No. 5, 745-762, 1997.
doi:10.1046/j.1365-2478.1997.500292.x Google Scholar

17. Li, J. H., C. G. Farquharson, and X. Hu, "Three effective inverse Laplace transform algorithms for computing time-domain electromagnetic responses," Geophysics, Vol. 81, No. 2, 113-128, 2016.
doi:10.1190/geo2015-0174.1 Google Scholar

18. Wang, H. J., "Digital filter algorithm of the sine and cosine transform," Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics (in Chinese), Vol. 1, No. 4, 329-335, 2004. Google Scholar

19. Raab, P. and F. Frishknecht, "Desktop computer processing of coincident and central loop time domain electromagnetic data," U.S. Geological Survey, 83-240, 1983. Google Scholar

20. Newman, G. A., G. W. Hohmann, and W. L. Anderson, Geophysics, Vol. 51, No. 8, 1608-1627, 1986.
doi:10.1190/1.1442212 Google Scholar

21. Everett, M. E., "Transient electromagnetic response of a loop source over a rough geological medium," Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 177, No. 2, 421-429, 2009.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.04011.x Google Scholar

Dr. Jian Chen

Dr. Fuxue Yan

Dr. Yishu Sun

Dr. Yang Zhang