2022-09-09
Parameter Identification Based on Chaotic Map Simulated Annealing Genetic Algorithm for PMSWG
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 113, 59-71, 2022
Abstract
Traditional genetic algorithm identification of permanent magnet synchronous wind generator (PMSWG) parameters is easy to fall into local optimum, resulting in low accuracy of parameter identification results and slow convergence, which reduces the accuracy of parameter tuning of proportional-integral (PI) controller. Aiming at this problem, a chaotic mapping simulated annealing genetic algorithm (CMSAGA) for identifying PMSWG parameters is proposed. The traditional genetic algorithm (GA) has the ability of global random search, combined with the probability breakthrough characteristic of the simulated annealing (SA) algorithm, which avoids the parameter identification result falling into the local optimum and finally tends to the global optimum. With the increase of iteration times, the initial population is mapped with tent chaos mapping theory, and the optimal value of the population is disturbed in each iteration to increase the diversity of the population, making the proposed algorithm converge faster and improve the accuracy. Experiments show that the proposed algorithm has good accuracy and convergence speed, PMSWG stator resistance, stator winding d-q axis inductance and permanent magnet flux can be identified.
Citation
Yang Zhang, Chao Zhang, and Zhun Cheng, "Parameter Identification Based on Chaotic Map Simulated Annealing Genetic Algorithm for PMSWG," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 113, 59-71, 2022.
doi:10.2528/PIERM22070101
References

1. Liu, X., Y. Pan, L.Wang, et al. "Model predictive control of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on parameter identification and dead time compensation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 120, 253-263, 2022.
doi:10.2528/PIERC22040103        Google Scholar

2. Wen, D., C. Shi, K. Liao, et al. "Fast backfire double annealing particle swarm optimization algorithm for parameter identification of permanent magnet synchronous motor," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 104, 23-38, 2021.
doi:10.2528/PIERM21052802        Google Scholar

3. Liu, X., Y. Pan, Y. Zhu, H. Han, and L. Ji, "Decoupling control of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on parameter identification of fuzzy least square method," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 103, 49-60, 2021.
doi:10.2528/PIERM21032601        Google Scholar

4. Zhu, L., B. Xu, and H. Zhu, "Interior permanent magnet synchronous motor dead-time compensation combined with extended Kalman and neural network bandpass filter," Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, Vol. 98, 193-203, 2020.
doi:10.2528/PIERM20100903        Google Scholar

5. Zhang, Y., Z. Yin, X. Sun, and Y. Zhong, "On-line identification methods of parameters for permanent magnet synchronous motors based on cascade MRAS," 2015 9th International Conference on Power Electronics and ECCE Asia (ICPE-ECCE Asia), 345-350, 2015.
doi:10.1109/ICPE.2015.7167808        Google Scholar

6. Li, M., K. Lv, C. Wen, et al. "Sensorless control of permanent magnet synchronous linear motor based on sliding mode variable structure MRAS flux observation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 101, 89-97, 2021.
doi:10.2528/PIERL21101401        Google Scholar

7. Ouyang, Y. and Y. Dou, "Speed sensorless control of PMSM based on MRAS parameter identification," 2018 21st International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), 1618-1622, IEEE, 2018.
doi:10.23919/ICEMS.2018.8549314        Google Scholar

8. Sun, P., Q. Ge, B. Zhang, et al. "Sensorless control technique of PMSM based on RLS on-line parameter identification," 2018 21st International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), 1670-1673, IEEE, 2018.
doi:10.23919/ICEMS.2018.8549482        Google Scholar

9. Jiang, X., P. Sun, and Z. Q. Zhu, "Modeling and simulation of parameter identification for PMSM based on EKF," 2010 International Conference on Computer, Mechatronics, Control and Electronic Engineering, 345-348, 2010.        Google Scholar

10. Xiao, Q., K. Liao, C. Shi, et al. "Parameter identification of direct-drive permanent magnet synchronous generator based on EDMPSO-EKF," IET Renewable Power Generation, Vol. 16, No. 5, 1073-1086, 2022.
doi:10.1049/rpg2.12415        Google Scholar

11. Sel, A., B. Sel, U. Coskun, et al. "Comparative study of an EKF-based parameter estimation and a nonlinear optimization-based estimation on PMSM system identification," Energies, Vol. 14, No. 19, 610, 2021.
doi:10.3390/en14196108        Google Scholar

12. Hussain, S. and M. A. Bazaz, "Sensorless control of PMSM drive using Neural Network Observer," 2016 IEEE 1st International Conference on Power Electronics, Intelligent Control and Energy Systems (ICPEICES), 1-5, IEEE, 2016.        Google Scholar

13. Wang, S., G. Yang, Z.-J. Qu, et al. "Identification of PMSM based on EKF and elman neural network," 2009 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, 1459-1463, IEEE, 2009.        Google Scholar

14. Zou, Y., P. X. Liu, C. Yang, et al. "Collision detection for virtual environment using particle swarm optimization with adaptive cauchy mutation," Cluster Computing, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1765-1774, 2017.
doi:10.1007/s10586-017-0815-6        Google Scholar

15. Liu, Z., J. Zhang, S. Zhou, X. Li, and K. Liu, "Coevolutionary particle swarm optimization using AIS and its application in multiparameter estimation of PMSM," IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, Vol. 43, No. 6, 1921-1935, Dec. 2013.
doi:10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2235828        Google Scholar

16. Avdeev, A. and O. Osipov, "PMSM identification using genetic algorithm," 2019 26th International Workshop on Electric Drives: Improvement in Efficiency of Electric Drives (IWED), 1-4, 2019.        Google Scholar

17. Guo, H., B. Zhou, P. Yang, and X. Gu, "Application of modified Stribeck model and simulated annealing genetic algorithm in friction parameter identification," 2017 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE), 1-5, 2017.        Google Scholar

18. Kumar, M., D. Husain, N. Upreti, et al. "Genetic algorithm: Review and application,", Available at SSRN 3529843, 2010.        Google Scholar

19. Zhang, D., W. Li, X. Wu, et al. "Application of simulated annealing genetic algorithm-optimized Back Propagation (BP) neural network in fault diagnosis," International Journal of Modeling, Simulation, and Scientific Computing, Vol. 10, No. 04, 1950024, 2019.
doi:10.1142/S1793962319500247        Google Scholar

20. Guo, H., B. Zhou, P. Yang, and X. Gu, "Application of modified Stribeck model and simulated annealing genetic algorithm in friction parameter identification," 2017 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE), 1-5, 2017.        Google Scholar