Reverberation chambers are widely used in electromag-netic compatibility test facilities because they provide a large working volume and are cheaper than other types of test facilities. In addition, they provide a statistically uniform field and generate a high maximum electric field within a relatively large volume. The volume of the cavity, the structure of the stirrer, and high tested frequency must be used in the reverberation chamber appropriately. Changing a volume of cavity dimensions and test frequency can be difficult in the reverberation chamber because they were determined already in the design process. In these cases, the stirrer should be changed. We investigated of the effects of various stirrer angles and heights on a reverberation chamber. The optimization of the stirrer with respect to various stirrer parameters was investigated; these parameters are related to field uniformity, the quality factor, stirred efficiency, and electric field polarity. Our results suggest that a reverberation chamber can be successfully operated if careful decisions are made regarding the stirrer design.
1. Hwang, S. M., J. I. Hong, and C. S. Huh, "Characterization of the susceptibility of integrated circuits with induction caused by high power microwaves," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 81, 61-72, 2008.
2. Hong, J. I., S. M. Hwang, and C. S. Huh, "Susceptibility of microcontroller devices due to coupling effects under narrow-band high power electromagnetic waves by magnetron," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 22, No. 17-18, 2451-2462, 2008.
3. Giri, D. V., High-power Electromagnetic Radiators Nonlethal Weapons and Other Applications, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England, 2004.
4. Taylor, C. D. and D. V. Giri, High-power Microwave Systems and Effects, Tayloer & Francis, Washington D.C., 1994.
5. Hoad, R., A. Lambourne, and A. Wraight, "HPEM and HEMP susceptibility assessments of computer equipment," 17th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 168-171, Feb. 27-Mar. 3, 2006.
6. Keyser, V. and J. F. Rosnarho, "Criteria of choice of mode stirred reverberation chamber," 10th International Conference on Electromagnetic Interference & Compatibility, INCEMIC 2008, 267-272, 2008.
7. Wellander, N., O. Lunden, and M. Backstrom, "Experimental investigation and mathematical modeling of design parameters for efficient stirrers in mode-stirred reverberation chambers," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 49, No. 1, 94-103, 2007.
8. Han, S. M., C. S. Huh, and J. S. Choi, "A new method for the compensation of coaxial cable loss while measuring EMP signals," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 23, No. 14-15, 1991-2000, 2009.
9. Zhong, W., Z. Shen, Y. K. R. Tai, and W. J. Koh, "Current distributions along a receiving thin dipole inside ideal anechoic and reverberation chambers," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 88, 105-120, 2008.
10. Zhao, H. and Z. Shen, "Modal-expansion analysis of a monopole in vibrating reverberation chamber," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 85, 303-322, 2008.
11. Wang, Y. J., W. J. Koh, and C. K. Lee, "Coupling cross section and shielding effectiveness measurements on a coaxial cable by both mode-tuned reverberation chamber and gtem cell methodologies," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 47, 61-73, 2004.
12. Kouveliotis, N. K., P. T. Trakadas, and C. N. Capsalis, "FDTD modeling of a vibrating intrinsic reverberation chamber," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 39, 47-59, 2003.
13. Fang, C. H., S. Zheng, H. Tan, D. Xie, and Q. Zhang, "Shielding effectiveness measurements on enclosures with various apertures by both mode-tuned reverberation chamber and gtem cell methodologies," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 2, 103-114, 2008.
14., IEC 61000-4-21, Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) --- Part 4--21: Testing and Measurement Techniques Reverberation Chamber Test Methods, 2003.
15. Hill, D. A., "Electromagnetic theory of reverberation chamber,", National Institute of Standards and Technology Technical Note 1506, NIST 1506, 1998.
16. Arnaut, L. R., "Statistics of quality factor of a rectangular reverberation chamber," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 45, No. 1, 61-76, 2003.
17. Lunden, O. and M. Backstrom, "A factorial designed experiment for evaluation of mode-stirrers in reverberation chambers," IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 1, 465-468, 2003.
18. Madsen, K., P. Hallbjorner, and C. Orlenius, "Models for the number of independent samples in reverberation chamber measurements with mechanical, frequency, and combined stirring," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 3, No. 1, 48-51, 2004.
19. Clegg, J., A. C. Marvin, and S. J. Porter, "Optimization of stirrer designs in a reverberation chamber," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 47, No. 4, 824-832, 2005.
20. Golestani-Rad, L. and J. Rashed-Mohassel, "Reconfiguration of personal computers' internal equipment for improved protection against penetrating EM pulses," Journal of Elelctromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 20, No. 5, 677-688, 2006.
21. Hoad, R., N. J. Carter, D. Herke, and S. P. Watkins, "Trends in EM susceptibility of IT equipment," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 46, No. 3, 309-395, 2004.
22. Asander, H. J., G. Eriksson, L. Jansson, and H. Akermark, "Field uniformity analysis of a mode stirred reverberation chamber using high resolution computational modeling," IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 1, 285-290, 2002.