Magnetic Induction Tomography (MIT) is a relatively new and emerging type of tomography techniques that is able to map the conductivity distribution of an object. Its non-invasive and contactless features make it an attractive technique for many applications compared to the traditional contact electrode based electrical impedance tomography. Recently, MIT has become a promising monitoring technique in industrial process tomography, and the area of the research interest has moved from 2D to 3D because of the volumetric nature of electromagnetic field. Three dimensional MIT images provide more information on the conductivity distribution, especially in the axial direction. However, it has been reported that the reconstructed 3D images can be distorted when the imaging object is located at a less sensitive region. Although this distortion can be com- pensated by adjusting the regularisation criteria, this is not practical in real life applications as the prior information about the object's location is often unavailable. This paper presents a memory ecient 4D MIT algorithm which can maintain the image quality under the same regularisation circumstances. Instead of solving each set of measurement individually, the 4D algorithm takes advantage of the correlations between the image and its neighboring data frames to reconstruct 4D of conductivity movements. The 4D algorithm improves the image qualities by increasing the temporal resolution. It also overcomes some sensitivity issues of 3D MIT algorithms and can provide a smoother and stabler result. Several experimental results are presented for validating the propose algorithms.
1. Soleimani, M., "Simultaneous reconstruction of permeability and conductivity in magnetic induction tomography," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 23, No. 5-6, 785-798, 2009. doi:10.1163/156939309788019822
2. Peyton, A. J., Z. Z. Yu, S. Al-Zeibak, N. H. Saunders,and A. R. Borges, "Electromagnetic imaging using mutual inductance tomography: Potential for process applications," Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, Vol. 12, No. 2, 68-74, Apr. 1995. doi:10.1002/ppsc.19950120204
3. Ma, X., S. R. Higson, A. Lyons, and A. J. Peyton, "Development of a fast electromagnetic induction tomography system for metal process applications," Proc. 4th World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography,WCIPT4, 196-201, Aizu, Japan, Sep. 2005.
4. Ma, X., A. J. Peyton, S. R. Higson, A. Lyons, and S. J. Dickinson, "Hardware and software design for an electromagnetic induction tomography (EMT) system applied to high contrast metal process applications," Meas. Sci. Technol., Vol. 17, No. 1, 111-118, 2006. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/17/1/018
5. Watson, S., R. J. Williams, W. A. Gough, and H. Griffths, "A magnetic induction tomography system for samples with conductivities less than 10 s.m-1," Meas. Sci. Technol., Vol. 19, 045501, 2008.
6. Scharfetter, H., R. Casanas, and J. Rosell, "Biological tissue characterization by magnetic induction spectroscopy (MIS):Requirements and limitations," IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 50, No. 7, 870-880, Jun. 2003. doi:10.1109/TBME.2003.813533
7. Vauhkonen, M., M. Hamsch, and C. H. Igney, "A measurement system and image reconstruction in magnetic induction tomography," Physiol. Meas., Vol. 29, S445-S454, 2008. doi:10.1088/0967-3334/29/6/S37
8. Merwa, R., K. Hollaus, P. Brunner, and H. Scharfetter, "Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT)," Physiol. Meas., Vol. 26, S241-S250, 2005. doi:10.1088/0967-3334/26/2/023
9. Watson, S., R. J. Williams, H. Gri±ths, W. Gough, and A. Morris, "Magnetic induction tomography: Phase versus vector-voltmeter measurement techniques," Physiol. Meas., Vol. 24, 555-564, 2003. doi:10.1088/0967-3334/24/2/365
10. Korjenevsky, A. V. and V. A. Cherepenin, "Progress in realization of magnetic induction tomography," Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 873, 346-352, 1999. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09482.x
11. Banasiak, R., Z. Ye, and M. Soleimani, "Improving three-dimensional electrical capacitance tomography imaging using approximation error model theory," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 26, No. 2-3, 411-421, 2012.
12. Solimene, R., A. Brancaccio, R. Di Napoli, and R. Pierri, "3D sliced tomographic inverse scattering experimental results," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 105, 1-13, 2010. doi:10.2528/PIER10050705
13. Goharian, M., M. Soleimani, and G. R. Moran, "A trust region subproblem for 3D electrical impedance tomography inverse problem using experimental data," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 94, 19-32, 2009. doi:10.2528/PIER09052003
14. Soleimani, M., "Sensitivity maps in three-dimensional magnetic induction tomography," Insight, Vol. 48, No. 1, 39-44, Jan. 2006. doi:10.1784/insi.2006.48.1.39
15. Soleimani, M., W. R. B. Lionheart, A. J. Peyton, X. Ma, and S. R. Higson, "A three-dimensional inverse finite-element method applied to experimental eddy-current imaging data," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 42, 1560-1567, May 2006. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2006.871255
16. Wei, H.-Y., L. Ma, and M. Soleimani, "Volumetric magnetic induction tomography," Meas. Sci. Technol., Vol. 23, No. 5, 055401, 2012.
17. Flores-Tapia, D., M. O'Halloran, and S. Pistorius, "A bimodal reconstruction method for breast cancer imaging," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 118, 461-486, 2011. doi:10.2528/PIER11050408
18. Liao, K.-F., X.-L. Zhang, and J. Shi, "Fast 3-D microwave imaging method based on subaperture approximation," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 126, 333-353, 2012. doi:10.2528/PIER12011106
19. Qi, Y., W. Tan, Y. Wang, W. Hong, and Y. Wu, "3D bistatic omega-K imaging algorithm for near range microwave imaging systems with bistatic planar scanning geometry," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 121, 409-431, 2011. doi:10.2528/PIER11090205
20. Catapano, I., F. Soldovieri, and L. Crocco, "On the feasibility of the linear sampling method for 3D GPR surveys," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 118, 185-203, 2011. doi:10.2528/PIER11042704
21. Asimakis, N. P., I. S. Karanasiou, and N. K. Uzunoglu, "Non-invasive microwave radiometric system for intracranial applications: A study using the conformal L-notch microstrip patch antenna," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 117, 83-101, 2011.
22. Adler, A., T. Dai, and W. R. B. Lionheart, "Temporal image reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography," Physiol.Meas., Vol. 28, S1-S11, 2007. doi:10.1088/0967-3334/28/7/S01
23. Soleimani, M., "Improving the temporal resolution of magnetic induction tomography for molten metal flow visualization," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 59, No. 3, 553-557, 2010. doi:10.1109/TIM.2009.2024704
25. Biro, O. and J. Preis, "On the use of the magnetic vector potential in the finite element analysis of three-dimensional eddy currents," IEEE Transaction on Magnetics, Vol. 25, No. 4, 3145-1359, 1989. doi:10.1109/20.34388
26. Kameari, A., "Regularization on ill-posed source terns in FEM computation using two magnetic vector potentials," IEEE Transaction on Magnetics, Vol. 40, No. 2, 1310-1313, 2004. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2004.824712
27. Banasiak, R., R. Wajman, D. Sankowski, and M. Soleimani, "Three-dimensional nonlinear inversion of electrical capacitance tomography data using a complete sensor model," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 100, 219-234, 2010. doi:10.2528/PIER09111201
28. Wei, H.-Y. and M. Soleimani, "Three dimensional magnetic induction tomography imaging using a matrix free Krylov subspace inversion algorithm," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 122, 29-45, 2012. doi:10.2528/PIER11091513
29. Soleimani, M., C. N. Mitchell, R. Banasiak, R. Wajman, and A. Adler, "Four-dimensional electrical capacitance tomography imaging using experimental data," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 90, 171-186, 2009. doi:10.2528/PIER09010202