volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

Most imaging modalities image an object's interior while all instrumentation, including sources and receivers, is externally located. One notable exception is ultra-sound (US), which can be miniaturized sufficiently to locate a US transducer within an object and gather data for image reconstruction. Another is cross-borehole geophysical imaging. The goal of any internal imaging modality is to provide images of greater fldelity while avoiding interfering structures. Due to the bulkiness of multi-coil magnetic induction tomography (MIT), transmitting and receiving coils are never placed within small targets (e.g., a human body). Here, we demonstrate a novel implementation of single-coil MIT that performs a scan all while the coil is located within the interior of a small, lab-created phantom consisting of salt-doped agarose. Phantom geometry is annular, consisting of a 6.0 cm diameter channel of depth 5.5 cm surrounded by a 3.0 cm thick cylindrical wall. A centrally located agarose gel annulus, 2.0 cm thick, is doped with sucient NaCl to elevate its conductivity above that of surrounding agarose. The resulting nearly axisymmetric phantoms consist of material having conductivity ranging from 0.11 to 10.55 S/m. A scan is accomplished robotically, with the coil stub-mounted on the positioning head of a 3-axis controller that positions the planar circular loop coil into 360 or 720 pre-programmed internal positions. Image reconstruction from gathered data is shown to correctly reveal the location, size and conductivity of the approximately axisymmetric inclusion.

1. Borcea, L., "Electrical impedance tomography," Inverse Problems, Vol. 18, R99-R136, 2002.
doi:10.1088/0266-5611/18/6/201 Google Scholar

2. Sikora, J., Boundary Element Method for Impedance and Optical Tomography, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, 2007.

3. Sikora, J., S. Wojtowicz, and eds., Industrial and Biological Tomography: Theoretical Basis and Applications, Wydawnictwo Ksiazkowe Instytutu Elektrotechniki, 2010.

4. Wei, H. Y. and M. Soleimani, "Electromagnetic tomography for medical and industrial applications: Challenges and opportunities," Proc. IEEE, Vol. 101, 559-564, 2013.
doi:10.1109/JPROC.2012.2237072 Google Scholar

5. Stawicki, K. and S. Gratkowski, "Optimization of signal coils in the magnetic induction tomography system," Przeglad Elektrotechniczny, Vol. 86, No. 5, 74-77, 2010. Google Scholar

6. Zakaria, Z., et al., "Advancements in transmitters and sensors for biological tissue imaging in magnetic induction tomography," Sensors, Vol. 12, 7126-7156, 2012.
doi:10.3390/s120607126 Google Scholar

7. Al-Zeibak, S. and H. N. Saunders, "A feasibility study of in vivo electromagnetic imaging," Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 38, No. 1, 151-160, 1993.
doi:10.1088/0031-9155/38/1/011 Google Scholar

8. Zhdanov, M. S. and K. Yoshioka, "Cross-well electromagnetic imaging in three dimensions," Exploration Geophysics, Vol. 34, 34-40, 2003.
doi:10.1071/EG03034 Google Scholar

9. Ma, L., H.-Y. Wei, and M. Soleimani, "Planar magnetic induction tomography for 3D near subsurface imaging," Progress In Electromagnetic Research, Vol. 138, 65-82, 2013.
doi:10.2528/PIER12110711 Google Scholar

10. Scharfetter, H., K. Hollaus, J. Rosell-Ferrer, and R. Merwa, "Single-step 3D image reconstruction in magnetic induction tomography: Theoretical limits of spatial resolution and contrast to noise ratio," Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 11, 1786-1798, 2006.
doi:10.1007/s10439-006-9177-6 Google Scholar

11. Dekdouk, B., C. Ktistis, D. W. Armitage, and A. J. Peyton, "Absolute imaging of low conductivity material distributions using nonlinear reconstruction methods in magnetic induction tomography," Progress In Electromagnetic Research, Vol. 155, 1-18, 2016.
doi:10.2528/PIER15071705 Google Scholar

12. Feldkamp, J. R., "Single-coil magnetic induction tomographic three-dimensional imaging," J. Medical Imaging, Vol. 2, No. 1, 013502, 2015.
doi:10.1117/1.JMI.2.1.013502 Google Scholar

13. Feldkamp, J. R. and S. Quirk, "Validation of a convolution integral for conductivity imaging," Progress In Electromagnetic Research Letters, Vol. 67, 1-6, 2017.
doi:10.2528/PIERL17011401 Google Scholar

14. Feldkamp, J. R. and S. Quirk, "Coil geometry effects on single-coil magnetic induction tomography," Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 62, 7097-7113, May 2017.
doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aa807b Google Scholar

15. Joines, M. T., Y. Zhang, C. Li, and R. L. Jirtle, "The measured electrical properties of normal and malignant human tissues from 50 to 900 MHz," Medical Physics, Vol. 21, No. 4, 547-550, 1994.
doi:10.1118/1.597312 Google Scholar

16. Sudduth, K. A., N. R. Kitchen, W. J. Wiebold, W. D. Batchelor, G. A. Bolero, D. E. Clay, H. L. Palm, F. J. Pierce, R. T. Schuler, and K. D. Thelen, "Relating apparent electrical conductivity to soil properties across the north-central U.S.A.," Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Vol. 46, 263-283, 2005.
doi:10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.010 Google Scholar

17. Palacky, G. J., "Resistivity characteristics of geologic targets (Ch. 3)," Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, Vol. 1, 53-129, 1988. Google Scholar

18. Feldkamp, J. R., "Inversion of an inductive loss convolution integral for conductivity imaging," Progress In Electromagnetic Research B, Vol. 74, 93-107, 2017.
doi:10.2528/PIERB17021413 Google Scholar

19. Parise, M., "On the surface fields of a small circular loop antenna placed on plane stratified earth," Intl. J. of Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 2015, Article ID 187806, 8 pages, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/187806, 2015. Google Scholar

20. Gradshteyn, I. S. and Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series and Products, Corrected and Enlarged Ed., A. Jeffrey, Academic Press, 1980.

21. Lapidus, L. and G. F. Pinder, Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations in Science and Engineering, Wiley-Interscience, J. Wiley & Sons, 1982.

22. Elden, L., "Algorithms for the regularization of ill-conditioned least squares problems," BIT, Vol. 17, 134-145, 1977.
doi:10.1007/BF01932285 Google Scholar

23. Donatelli, M., A. Neuman, and L. Reichel, "Square regularization matrices for large linear discrete ill-posed problems," Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications, Vol. 19, 896-913, 2012.
doi:10.1002/nla.1833 Google Scholar

24. Katamreddy, S. H. and P. K. Yalavarthy, "Model-resolution based regularization improves near infrared diffuse optical tomography," J. Opt. Soc. Am., Vol. 29, No. 5, 649-656, 2012.
doi:10.1364/JOSAA.29.000649 Google Scholar

25. Feldkamp, J. R. and S. Quirk, "Effects of tissue heterogeneity on single-coil, scanning MIT imaging," Proc. SPIE 9783, Medical Imaging: Physics of Medical Imaging, 978359, 2016. Google Scholar

26. Feldkamp, J. R. and S. Quirk, "Optically tracked, single-coil, scanning magnetic induction tomography," J. Medical Imaging, Vol. 4, No. 2, 023504, 2017.
doi:10.1117/1.JMI.4.2.023504 Google Scholar

27. Feldkamp, J. R. and S. Quirk, "Optically tracked, single-coil, scanning magnetic induction tomography," Proc. SPIE 10132, Medical Imaging: Physics of Medical Imaging, 10132172, 2017. Google Scholar

Dr. Joe R. Feldkamp

Dr. Stephen Quirk