Experimental study and SPICE simulation of CMOS digital circuits latch-up effects due to high power microwave interference are reported in this paper. As a traditional inherent destruction phenomenon, latch-up effect may jeopardize the correct function of the circuits, and could be triggered in various ways such as ESD pulse, cosmic ray, heavy ion particles etc. Through the directly injected experimental investigation of CMOS inverters, it is shown that the single short high power RF pulse not only could disturb and upset the inverters output logic voltage, but also might trigger CMOS latch-up effects. It is observed that the RF pulse leading to inverters latch-up effects have energy threshold characteristics, which means that the injected RF pulse power is inversely proportional to the pulse width. SPICE simulations indicated that the inverters maximum static consumption current in latch-up state will increase up to 6600 multiples compared to the normal value when input logic state is high. With the device scaling down, higher integration and higher working frequency, the power consumption problem plays a significant role, which makes CMOS logic circuits more vulnerable due to the latch-up effects under high power microwave threats.
"Experimental Study and SPICE Simulation of CMOS Inverters LATCH-Up Effects Due to High Power Microwave Interference," Progress In Electromagnetics Research,
Vol. 87, 313-330, 2008. doi:10.2528/PIER08100408
1. Backstrom, M. G. and K. G. Lovstrand, "Susceptibility of electronic systems to high-power microwaves: Summary of test experience," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 46, No. 3, 396-403, August 2004. doi:10.1109/TEMC.2004.831814
2. Richard, H., L. Andrew, and A. Wraight, "HPEM and HEMP susceptibility assessments of computer equipment," 17th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 168-171, 2006.
3. Michael, C. and G. Heyno, "Susceptibility of personal computer systems to fast transient electromagnetic pulses," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 48, No. 4, 829-833, November 2006. doi:10.1109/TEMC.2006.882844
4. Golestani-Rad and J. Rashed-Mohassel, "Reconfiguration of personal computers' internal equipment for improved protection against penetrating EM pulses," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves andApplic ation, Vol. 20, No. 5, 677-688, 2006. doi:10.1163/156939306776137773
5. Richard, H., J. Nigel, and H. David, et al., "Trends in EM susceptibility of IT equipment," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 46, No. 3, 390-395, August 2004. doi:10.1109/TEMC.2004.831815
6. Daniel, N., C. Michael, S. Frank, et al. "Susceptibility of some electronic equipment to HPEM threats," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 46, No. 3, 380-389, August 2004. doi:10.1109/TEMC.2004.831842
7. Weissgerber, T. and D. Peier, "Electromagnetic susceptibility of TTL and CMOS inverters influence of pulseform and external elements," Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Optimization of Electrical andEle ctronic Equipments, Vol. 1, May 14-15 1998.
8. Gunnar, G., "HPM effects on electronic components and the importance of this knowledge evaluation of system susceptibility," IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 1, 543-548, 1999.
9. Firestone, T. M., RF induced nonlinear effects in high-speed electronics, 1-87, [dissertation], University of Maryland, 2004.
10. Hwang, S. M., J. I. Hong, and C. S. Huh, "Characterization of the susceptibility of integrated circuits with induction caused by High Power Microwaves," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 81, 61-72, 2008. doi:10.2528/PIER07121704
11. Kyechong, K. and A. Agis, "Impact of microwave interference on dynamic operation and power dissipation of CMOS inverters," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 49, No. 2, 329-338, 2007. doi:10.1109/TEMC.2007.893333
12. Sun, M. H., H. Joo-I, M. H. Seung, et al. "Delay time and power supply current characteristics of CMOS inverter broken by intentional high power microwave," Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference, 2007. doi:10.1109/TEMC.2007.908820
13. Kyechong, K. and A. Agis, "Critical upsets of CMOS inverters in static operation due to high-power microwave interference," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 49, No. 4, 876-885, 2007. doi:10.1109/TEMC.2007.908820
14. Wang, H., C. Dirik, S. V. Rodriguez, et al. "Radio frequency effects on clock networks of digital circuits," IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 1, 93-96, 2004.
15. Eilhard Haseloff, Latch-up, ESD, and Other phenomena (Rev.A).pdf, Application Report, Texas Instruments, 2000.
16. Constans, E. and L. Rosier, "Latch-up on CMOS/EPIdevices," IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 37, No. 6, 1839-1842, December 1990. doi:10.1109/23.101198
17. Stephen, J., T. Sanderson, D. Mapper, et al. "Cosmic ray simulation experiments for the study of single event upsets and latch-up in CMOS memories," IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 30, No. 6, 4464-4468, December 1983. doi:10.1109/TNS.1983.4333155
18. Hospelhorn, R. and B. Shafer, "Radiation induced latch-up modeling of CMOS IC's," IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 34, No. 6, 1396-1401, December 1987. doi:10.1109/TNS.1987.4337487
19. Kyechong, K. and A. Agis, "Characteristics of latch-up in CMOS inverters in pulsed electromagnetic interference environments," ISDRS, 2007.
20. Barker, R. J. and E. Schamiloglu, High-power Microwaves Sources and Technologies, IEEE Press, New York, 2001.
21. Benford, J., J. Swegle, and E. Schamiloglu, High Power Microwave, 2nd Ed., Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, 2007.