volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

A theoretical study and a simulation method are proposed for superparamagnetic current sensors implementing a uniformly wound toroidal core topology. So as to be easy to implement, this sensor topology can be made flexible thanks to the use of a core made up of a superparamagnetic powder embedded in a flexible plastic matrix. The measurement of DC and AC currents is possible provided that a sinusoidal magnetic field excitation is applied to the superparamagnetic transducer. An analytical model is proposed for computing the sensor output signal and we demonstrate that when the detection of the component at the second order harmonic of the excitation frequency is used, the measurement is independent of the conductor position in a given current range. For simulating the dynamic response of the sensor, we propose to combine the analytical model, or a finite elements model, with a time-discretization method. Furthermore, simulations are carried out considering a ring shaped sensor and the real magnetization characteristics of a superparamagnetic material. Simulations are provided over the [-10 kA 10 kA] range and for various amplitudes of the excitation signal. The results obtained with the analytical model, which is computationally efficient, are within 4% to 12.7% from the numerical results.

1. Costa, F., P. Poulichet, F. Mazaleyrat, and E. Laboure, "The current sensors in power electronics, a review," EPE Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, 7-18, 2001. Google Scholar

2. Ripka, P., "Sensors based on bulk soft magnetic materials: Advances and challenges," J. Magn. Magn. Mater., Vol. 320, 2466-2473, 2008.
doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.04.079 Google Scholar

3. Ripka, P., "Advances in fluxgate sensors," Sens. Actuators A, Vol. 106, 8-14, 2003.
doi:10.1016/S0924-4247(03)00094-3 Google Scholar

4. Ray, W., "Wide bandwidth Rogowski current transducers, Part 1: The Rogowski coil," EPE Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, 51-59, 1993. Google Scholar

5. Lenglet, L., "Current & magnetic field sensors, control method & magnetic core for said sensors," Billanco Patent WO2007042646 (A1), 2007. Google Scholar

6. Vourc'h, E., P. Y. Joubert, G. Cinquin, Y. Maniouloux, L. Cima, "Novel magnetic field and current sensors based on superparamagnetic transducers," Sensor Letters, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1-6, 2009. Google Scholar

7. Prokopovich, D. V., A. V. Popov, and A. V. Vinogradov, "Analytical and numerical aspects of bragg fiber design," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 6, 361-379, 2008.
doi:10.2528/PIERB08031221 Google Scholar

8. Steinbauer, M., R. Kubasek, and K. Bartusek, "Numerical method of simulation of material influences in MR tomography," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 1, 205-210, 2008.
doi:10.2528/PIERL07120605 Google Scholar

9. Ozgun, O. and M. Kuzuoglu, "Finite element analysis of electromagnetic scattering problems via iterative leap-field domain decomposition method," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 22, No. 2--3, 251-266, 2008.
doi:10.1163/156939308784160668 Google Scholar

10. Urbani, F., "Numerical analysis of periodic planar structures on uniaxial substrates for miniaturization purposes," Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 5, 131-136, 2008.
doi:10.2528/PIERL08111303 Google Scholar

11. Neel, L., "Influence des fluctuations thermiques sur l'aimantation de grains ferromagnetiques trµes fins," Compte Rendu Hebdo-madaire de Seance de l'Academie des Sciences, Vol. 228, 664-666, 1949. Google Scholar

12. Neel, L., "Theorie du trainage magnetique des ferromagnetiques en grains fins avec application aux terres cuites," Annales de Geophysique, Vol. 5, 99-136, 1949. Google Scholar

13. Bean, C. P., "Hysteresis loops of mixtures of ferromagnetic micropowders," J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 26, No. 11, 1381-1383, 1955.
doi:10.1063/1.1721912 Google Scholar

14. Bean, C. P. and J. D. Livingston, "Superparamagnetism," J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 30, 120S-129S, 1955. Google Scholar

15. Gleich, B. and J. Weizenecker, "Tomographic imaging using the nonlinear response of magnetic particles," Nature, Vol. 435, No. 7046, 1173-4, 2005.
doi:10.1038/nature03808 Google Scholar

16. Pankhurst, Q. A., J. Connolly, S. K. Jones, and J. Dobson, "Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine," J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., Vol. 36, R167-R181, 2003.
doi:10.1088/0022-3727/36/13/201 Google Scholar

17. Arruebo, M., R. Fernandez-Pachero, M. R. Ibarra, and J. Santamaria, "Magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery," Nanotoday, Vol. 2, No. 3, 22-32, 2007. Google Scholar

18. Raj, K., R. Moskowitz, and R. Casciari, "Advances in ferrofluid in ferrofluid technology," J. Magn. Magn. Mater., Vol. 149, 174-180, 1995.
doi:10.1016/0304-8853(95)00365-7 Google Scholar

19. Ravaud, R. and G. Lemarquand, "Design of ironless loudspeakers with ferrofluid seals: Analytical study based on the coulombian model," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 14, 285-309, 2009.
doi:10.2528/PIERB09031904 Google Scholar

20. Kneller, E. and F. E. Fand Luborsky, "Particle size dependence of coercivity and remanence of single domain particles," J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 34, 656-658, 1963.
doi:10.1063/1.1729324 Google Scholar

21. Cullity, B. D. and C. D. Graham, Introduction to Magnetic Materials, 2nd Ed., Wiley-IEEE Press, 2008.

Dr. Eric Vourc'h

Dr. Pierre-Yves Joubert

Dr. Lionel Cima