volume | PIER Journals

Abstract

Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) is becoming a crucial issue in the era of modern electronic systems. For EMI measurement, it is required to place a sensor to receive the radiation from the equipment in a suitable test environment. The performance of the sensor depends on its Antenna Factor, which is the ratio of the incident electric field on the antenna surface to the received voltage at the load end across 50Î© resistance. FDTD is one of the efficient numerical techniques to solve radiation and scattering problem in any environments. To the best of the knowledge of the authors no literature is available where FDTD is used to evaluate the Antenna Factor. Here, in this work we applied FDTD to predict the performance of dipole antenna when it is used as a EMI sensor. The results presented here for free space environment are compared with published results.

1. Paul, C. R., Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility, Wiley Series in Microwave and Optical Engineering, 1992.

2. Ghosh, S., "Some studies on loaded and unloaded wire antennas as EMI sensors," Ph.D. dissertation, No. 8, 2003. Google Scholar

3. Wang, K. and R. Nelson, "Numerical simulation of the antenna factor of a broadband dipole antenna," Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 1, 13-17, 2001.

4. Ghosh, S., A. Chakrabarty, and S. Sanyal, "Loaded wire antenna as EMI sensor," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 54, 19-36, 2005.
doi:10.2528/PIER04080501 Google Scholar

5. Yee, K. S., "Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwells equations in isotropic media," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 14, No. 3, 302-307, 1966.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1966.1138693 Google Scholar

6. Sullivan, D. M., Electromagnetic Simulation Using The FDTD Method, IEEE Press, 2000.

7. Taove, A. and M. Brodwin, "Numerical solution of steady-state electromagnetic scattering problems using the time-dependent maxwells equations," IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., Vol. MTT-23, No. 8, 623630, 1975. Google Scholar

8. Sadiku, M.V. Bemmel, and S. Agbo, "Stability criteria for finitedifference time-domain algorithm," Proc. IEEE, No. 4, 48-50, 1990.

9. Taove, A. and S. C. Hagness, Computational Electromagneticâ€” The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method, Artech House, 2005.

10. Sullivan, D. M., "A simplified PML for use with the FDTD method," IEEE Microwave Wireless Compon. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 2, 1996. Google Scholar

11. Sullivan, D. M., "An unsplit step 3-d PML for use with the FDTD method," IEEE Microwave Wireless Compon. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 2, 184-186, 1997. Google Scholar

12. Yu, W. and R. Mittra, Conformal Finite-Difference Time- Domain Maxwells Equations Solver: Software and Users Guide, Artech House, 2004.

13. Das, S. and A. Chakrabarty, "A novel modeling technique to solve a class of rectangular waveguide based circuits and radiators," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 61, 231-252, 2006.
doi:10.2528/PIER06010302 Google Scholar

14. Bhattacharya, A., S. Gupta, and A. Chakraborty, "Analysis of rectangular waveguide and thick windows as EMI sensors," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 22, 231-258, 1999.
doi:10.2528/PIER98081002 Google Scholar

15. Ghosh, S. and A. Chakrabarty, "Performance analysis of EMI sensor in different test sites with different wave impedances," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 62, 127-142, 2006.
doi:10.2528/PIER06030101 Google Scholar

16. Instruction Manual, Dipole Antenna MP651A/B, Dipole Antenna MP651A/B, Anritsu Corp.

17. Ghosh, S. and A. Chakrabarty, "Estimation of equivalent circuit of loaded trans-receive antenna system and its time domain studies," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 20, 89-103, 2006.
doi:10.1163/156939306775777314 Google Scholar

Dr. Maifuz Ali

Dr. Subrata Sanyal