1. Corona, P., G. Latmiral, E. Paolini, and L. Piccioli, "Use of a reverberating enclosure for measurements of radiated power in the microwave range," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 18, No. 2, 54-59, 1976.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.1976.303466 Google Scholar
2. Corona, P., G. Latmiral, and E. Paolini, "Performance and analysis of a reverberating enclosure with variable geometry," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 22, No. 1, 2-5, 1980.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.1980.303814 Google Scholar
3. Ma, M., "Understanding reverberating chambers as an alternative facility for EMC testing," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 3-4, 339-351, 1988.
doi:10.1163/156939388X00260 Google Scholar
4. Rahman, H., "Electromagnetic susceptibility of a folded cable of finite thickness in a shielded enclosure to external excitation," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 12, No. 10, 1349-1356, 1998.
doi:10.1163/156939398X01439 Google Scholar
5. Hatfield, M., "Status of reverberation chamber standards," Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. EMC, 279-281, 2003.
doi:10.2528/PIER02050804 Google Scholar
6. Kouveliotis, N., P. Trakadas, and C. Capsalis, "FDTD modeling of a vibrating intrinsic reverberation chamber," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 39, 47-59, 2003.
doi:10.2528/PIER02050804 Google Scholar
7. Wang, Y., W. Koh, and C. Lee, "Coupling cross section and shielding effectiveness measurements on a coaxial cable by both mode-tuned reverberation chamber and gtem cell methodologies," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 47, 61-73, 2004.
doi:10.2528/PIER03100101 Google Scholar
8. Zhao, H. and Z. Shen, "Modal-expansion analysis of a monopole in vibrating reverberation chamber," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 85, 303-322, 2008.
doi:10.2528/PIER08090209 Google Scholar
9. Musso, L., F. Canavero, B. Demoulin, and V. Berat, "Radiated immunity testing of a device with an external wire: Repeatability of reverberation chamber results and correlation with anechoic chamber results," Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. EMC, 828-833, 2003. Google Scholar
10. Koepke, G., D. Hill, and J. Ladbury, "Directivity of the test device in EMC measurement," Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. EMC, Reverberation Chamber Workshop, 535-539, 2000. Google Scholar
11. Freyer, G. and M. Backstrom, "Comparison of anechoic and reverberation chamber coupling data as a function of directivity pattern," Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. EMC, 615-620, 2000. Google Scholar
12. Freyer, G. and M. Backstrom, "Impact of equipment response characteristics on anechoic and reverberation chamber test results," Proc. EMC Europe, Int. Symp. Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 1, 51-55, 2002. Google Scholar
13. Moglie, F. and A. Pastore, "FDTD analysis of plane waves superposition to simulate susceptibility tests in reverberation chambers," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 48, No. 1, 195-202, 2006.
doi:10.1109/TEMC.2006.870793 Google Scholar
14. Chang, D., S. Lee, and L. Rispin, "Simple formula for current on a cylindrical receiving antenna," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 26, No. 5, 683-690, 1978.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1978.1141906 Google Scholar
15. Huang, E. and A. Fung, "An application of sampling theorem to moment method simulation in surface scattering," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 20, No. 4, 531-546, 2006.
doi:10.1163/156939306776117063 Google Scholar
16. Selcuk, A. and B. Saka, "A general method for the analysis of curved wire antennas," Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 21, No. 2, 175-188, 2007.
doi:10.1163/156939307779378835 Google Scholar
17. Su, C. and T. Sarkar, "A new formula for the evaluation of the impedance matrix in the method of moments," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 22, 85-105, 1999.
doi:10.2528/PIER98081501 Google Scholar
18. Lashab, M., F. Benabdelaziz, and C.-E. Zebiri, "Analysis of electromagnetics scattering from reflector and cylindrical antennas using wavelet-based moment method," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 76, 357-368, 2007.
doi:10.2528/PIER07071401 Google Scholar
19. Hatamzadeh-Varmazyar, S., M. Naser-Moghadasi, and Z. Masouri, "A moment method simulation of electromagnetic scattering from conducting bodies," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 81, 99-119, 2008.
doi:10.2528/PIER07122502 Google Scholar
20. Harrington, R., Field Computation by Moment Methods, Macmillan, 1968.
21. Tai, C., "On the definition of effective aperture of antenna," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. 9, 224-225, 1961.
doi:10.1109/TAP.1961.1144972 Google Scholar
22. Hill, D., "Plane wave integral representation for fields in reverberation chambers," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 40, No. 3, 209-217, 1998.
doi:10.1109/15.709418 Google Scholar
23. Hill, D., "Spatial correlation function for fields in a reverberation chamber," IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., Vol. 37, No. 1, 138, 1995.
doi:10.1109/15.350256 Google Scholar
24. Musso, L., V. Berat, F. Canavero, and B. Demoulin, "A plane wave Monte Carlo simulation method for reverberation chambers," Proc. EMC Europe, Int. Symp. Electromagnetic Compatibility, Vol. 1, 45-50, 2002. Google Scholar
25. Balanis, C., Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 3rd Ed., Wiley, 2005.
26. Gronwald, F., "The influence of electromagnetic singularities on an active dipole antenna within a cavity," Advances in Radio Science, Vol. 1, 57-61, 2003. Google Scholar