Vol. 185
Latest Volume
All Volumes
PIER 185 [2026] PIER 184 [2025] PIER 183 [2025] PIER 182 [2025] PIER 181 [2024] PIER 180 [2024] PIER 179 [2024] PIER 178 [2023] PIER 177 [2023] PIER 176 [2023] PIER 175 [2022] PIER 174 [2022] PIER 173 [2022] PIER 172 [2021] PIER 171 [2021] PIER 170 [2021] PIER 169 [2020] PIER 168 [2020] PIER 167 [2020] PIER 166 [2019] PIER 165 [2019] PIER 164 [2019] PIER 163 [2018] PIER 162 [2018] PIER 161 [2018] PIER 160 [2017] PIER 159 [2017] PIER 158 [2017] PIER 157 [2016] PIER 156 [2016] PIER 155 [2016] PIER 154 [2015] PIER 153 [2015] PIER 152 [2015] PIER 151 [2015] PIER 150 [2015] PIER 149 [2014] PIER 148 [2014] PIER 147 [2014] PIER 146 [2014] PIER 145 [2014] PIER 144 [2014] PIER 143 [2013] PIER 142 [2013] PIER 141 [2013] PIER 140 [2013] PIER 139 [2013] PIER 138 [2013] PIER 137 [2013] PIER 136 [2013] PIER 135 [2013] PIER 134 [2013] PIER 133 [2013] PIER 132 [2012] PIER 131 [2012] PIER 130 [2012] PIER 129 [2012] PIER 128 [2012] PIER 127 [2012] PIER 126 [2012] PIER 125 [2012] PIER 124 [2012] PIER 123 [2012] PIER 122 [2012] PIER 121 [2011] PIER 120 [2011] PIER 119 [2011] PIER 118 [2011] PIER 117 [2011] PIER 116 [2011] PIER 115 [2011] PIER 114 [2011] PIER 113 [2011] PIER 112 [2011] PIER 111 [2011] PIER 110 [2010] PIER 109 [2010] PIER 108 [2010] PIER 107 [2010] PIER 106 [2010] PIER 105 [2010] PIER 104 [2010] PIER 103 [2010] PIER 102 [2010] PIER 101 [2010] PIER 100 [2010] PIER 99 [2009] PIER 98 [2009] PIER 97 [2009] PIER 96 [2009] PIER 95 [2009] PIER 94 [2009] PIER 93 [2009] PIER 92 [2009] PIER 91 [2009] PIER 90 [2009] PIER 89 [2009] PIER 88 [2008] PIER 87 [2008] PIER 86 [2008] PIER 85 [2008] PIER 84 [2008] PIER 83 [2008] PIER 82 [2008] PIER 81 [2008] PIER 80 [2008] PIER 79 [2008] PIER 78 [2008] PIER 77 [2007] PIER 76 [2007] PIER 75 [2007] PIER 74 [2007] PIER 73 [2007] PIER 72 [2007] PIER 71 [2007] PIER 70 [2007] PIER 69 [2007] PIER 68 [2007] PIER 67 [2007] PIER 66 [2006] PIER 65 [2006] PIER 64 [2006] PIER 63 [2006] PIER 62 [2006] PIER 61 [2006] PIER 60 [2006] PIER 59 [2006] PIER 58 [2006] PIER 57 [2006] PIER 56 [2006] PIER 55 [2005] PIER 54 [2005] PIER 53 [2005] PIER 52 [2005] PIER 51 [2005] PIER 50 [2005] PIER 49 [2004] PIER 48 [2004] PIER 47 [2004] PIER 46 [2004] PIER 45 [2004] PIER 44 [2004] PIER 43 [2003] PIER 42 [2003] PIER 41 [2003] PIER 40 [2003] PIER 39 [2003] PIER 38 [2002] PIER 37 [2002] PIER 36 [2002] PIER 35 [2002] PIER 34 [2001] PIER 33 [2001] PIER 32 [2001] PIER 31 [2001] PIER 30 [2001] PIER 29 [2000] PIER 28 [2000] PIER 27 [2000] PIER 26 [2000] PIER 25 [2000] PIER 24 [1999] PIER 23 [1999] PIER 22 [1999] PIER 21 [1999] PIER 20 [1998] PIER 19 [1998] PIER 18 [1998] PIER 17 [1997] PIER 16 [1997] PIER 15 [1997] PIER 14 [1996] PIER 13 [1996] PIER 12 [1996] PIER 11 [1995] PIER 10 [1995] PIER 09 [1994] PIER 08 [1994] PIER 07 [1993] PIER 06 [1992] PIER 05 [1991] PIER 04 [1991] PIER 03 [1990] PIER 02 [1990] PIER 01 [1989]
2026-05-29
An Abbe-Hopkins Unified Formulation of Optical Imaging for Efficient Cross-Model Verification in Computational Lithography
By
Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 185, 110-117, 2026
Abstract
Accurate simulation of partially coherent imaging is crucial for computational lithography, with Abbe and Hopkins as the two main formulations being used. Although the two methods are equivalent in theory, practical simulators making independent choices between Abbe and Hopkins could hardly produce consistent results that match the desired accuracy owing to the inherently different ways of numerically representing, discretizing, and truncating the illumination source and lens pupil function, etc. Moreover, classical Hopkins models require prior construction and/or eigen decomposition of the high-dimensional transmission cross coefficient (TCC), the prohibitive costs of which hinder timely model verification. To address these challenges, we developed a unified Abbe-Hopkins formulation in conjunction with a TCC-free Hopkins pointwise sampler for efficient cross-model validation. Our formulation supports both Abbe and Hopkins modeling in a single unified framework, with the two simulation modes using exactly the same numerical representations of the illumination source and projection lens. Cross-model verification for randomly sampled points is performed efficiently by evaluating the Hopkins quadratic form through a fast Fourier transform of an image and a few pointwise multiplications between images, without ever explicitly constructing a TCC and eigen-analyzing it. Numerical tests show that the Abbe and Hopkins results agree up to the machine precision level.
Citation
Qi Sun, Ying Wang, Ziyin Ma, Shujie Liu, Degui Li, Zhonglei Mei, and David H. Wei, "An Abbe-Hopkins Unified Formulation of Optical Imaging for Efficient Cross-Model Verification in Computational Lithography," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 185, 110-117, 2026.
doi:10.2528/PIER26031208
References

1. Ma, Xing-Yu and Shaogang Hao, "Inverse lithography physics-informed deep neural level set for mask optimization," Applied Optics, Vol. 62, No. 33, 8769-8779, 2023.
doi:10.1364/ao.503332        Google Scholar

3. Chen, Guojin, Zehua Pei, Haoyu Yang, Yuzhe Ma, Bei Yu, and Martin Wong, "Physics-informed optical kernel regression using complex-valued neural fields," 2023 60th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC), 1-6, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2023.
doi:10.1109/dac56929.2023.10247680

4. Ma, X., S. Zhang, Y. Pan, J. Zhang, C. Yu, L. Dong, and Y. Wei, "Research and progress of computational lithography," Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Vol. 59, No. 9, 112-160, 2022.
doi:10.3788/LOP202259.0922008        Google Scholar

5. Shen, Yijiang, "Level-set based mask synthesis with a vector imaging model," Optics Express, Vol. 25, No. 18, 21775-21785, 2017.
doi:10.1364/oe.25.021775        Google Scholar

6. Chen, Guodong, Sikun Li, and Xiangzhao Wang, "Efficient optical proximity correction based on virtual edge and mask pixelation with two-phase sampling," Optics Express, Vol. 29, No. 11, 17440-17463, 2021.
doi:10.1364/oe.415913        Google Scholar

7. Chen, Qiao-Ping, Hongyu Liu, Zejun Sun, Li-Li Wang, and Guang-Hui Zheng, "Inverse random source problem for the helmholtz equation from statistical phaseless data," Journal of Scientific Computing, Vol. 107, No. 1, 18, 2026.
doi:10.1007/s10915-026-03233-8        Google Scholar

8. Gao, Yu, Hongyu Liu, Xianchao Wang, and Kai Zhang, "On an artificial neural network for inverse scattering problems," Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 448, 110771, 2022.
doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110771        Google Scholar

9. Chang, Yan, Yukun Guo, Hongyu Liu, and Deyue Zhang, "Recovering source location, polarization, and shape of obstacle from elastic scattering data," Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 489, 112289, 2023.
doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112289        Google Scholar

10. Chow, Yat Tin, Youjun Deng, Youzi He, Hongyu Liu, and Xianchao Wang, "Surface-localized transmission eigenstates, super-resolution imaging, and pseudo surface plasmon modes," SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 3, 946-975, 2021.
doi:10.1137/20m1388498        Google Scholar

11. Thompson, Larry F., "An introduction to lithography," Introduction to Microlithography, 1-13, ACS Publications, 1983.
doi:10.1021/bk-1983-0219.ch001        Google Scholar

12. Agudelo, Viviana, Peter Evanschitzky, Andreas Erdmann, Tim Fühner, Feng Shao, Steffen Limmer, and Dietmar Fey, "Accuracy and performance of 3D mask models in optical projection lithography," Optical Microlithography XXIV, Vol. 7973, 236-246, San Jose, California, United States, 2011.
doi:10.1117/12.879053

13. Abbe, E., "Beiträge zur theorie des mikroskops und der mikroskopischen wahrnehmung," Archiv für Mikroskopische Anatomie, Vol. 9, No. 1, 413-468, 1873.
doi:10.1007/bf02956173        Google Scholar

14. Hopkins, Harold Horace, "On the diffraction theory of optical images," Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol. 217, No. 1130, 408-432, 1953.
doi:10.1098/rspa.1953.0071        Google Scholar

15. Born, M. and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 7th Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.

16. Erdmann, A., Optical and EUV Lithography: A Modeling Perspective, Ser. Press Monographs, SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA, 2021.

17. Mandel, L. and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.

18. Wolf, Emil, Introduction to the Theory of Coherence and Polarization of Light, Cambridge University Press, 2007.

19. Sabatier, Romuald, Caroline Fossati, Salah Bourennane, and Antonio Di Giacomo, "Fast approximation of transfer cross coefficient for optical proximity correction," Optics Express, Vol. 16, No. 19, 15249-15253, 2008.
doi:10.1364/oe.16.015249        Google Scholar

20. Yamazoe, Kenji, "Computation theory of partially coherent imaging by stacked pupil shift matrix," Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vol. 25, No. 12, 3111-3119, 2008.
doi:10.1364/josaa.25.003111        Google Scholar

21. Zuo, Yehua and Jinyu Zhang, "A new method to calculate intensity distribution in source mask optimization," 2015 China Semiconductor Technology International Conference, 1-3, Shanghai, China, 2015.
doi:10.1109/cstic.2015.7153364

22. Zheng, Xianqiang, Xu Ma, Qile Zhao, Yihua Pan, and Gonzalo R. Arce, "Model-informed deep learning for computational lithography with partially coherent illumination," Optics Express, Vol. 28, No. 26, 39475-39491, 2020.
doi:10.1364/oe.413721        Google Scholar

23. Pati, Y. C. and T. Kailath, "Phase-shifting masks for microlithography: Automated design and mask requirements," Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vol. 11, No. 9, 2438-2452, 1994.
doi:10.1364/josaa.11.002438        Google Scholar

24. Cobb, Neal B., "Fast optical and process proximity correction algorithms for integrated circuit manufacturing," Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, 1998.

25. Lanczos, Cornelius, "An iteration method for the solution of the eigenvalue problem of linear differential and integral operators," Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Vol. 45, No. 4, 255-282, 1950.
doi:10.6028/jres.045.026        Google Scholar

26. Golub, G. H. and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations, 3rd Ed., Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.

27. Guo, Shaopeng, Haofeng Chen, Chunxiao Mu, Song Zhang, Hao Jiang, David H. Wei, Yanlong Sun, and Shiyuan Liu, "Mask3D-compatible full-vectorial Hopkins imaging for lithographic modeling," Optica, Vol. 12, No. 7, 924-934, 2025.
doi:10.1364/optica.565511        Google Scholar

28. Zhang, Hongbo, Qiliang Yan, David Wei, and Ebo Croffie, "A pattern-and optics-independent compact model of Mask3D under off-axis illumination with significant efficiency and accuracy improvements," Optical Microlithography XXVIII, Vol. 9426, 188-197, San Jose, California, United States, 2015.
doi:10.1117/12.2086046

29. Wei, David H., Rafael Howell, Yen-Wen Lu, and Yu Cao, "Mathematical foundations of a geometric theory of diffraction for light scattering from a 3D topographic photomask," 2019 PhotonIcs & Electromagnetics Research Symposium --- Spring (PIERS-Spring), 2867-2879, Rome, Italy, Jun. 17-20, 2019.
doi:10.1109/piers-spring46901.2019.9017443

30. Apostol, Ştefan, Paul Hurley, and Radu-Cristian Ionescu, "Accurate and fast computation of transmission cross coefficients," Optical Microlithography XXVIII, Vol. 9426, 527-539, San Jose, California, United States, 2015.
doi:10.1117/12.2085756

31. Slepian, D. and H. O. Pollak, "Prolate spheroidal wave functions, Fourier analysis and uncertainty --- I," Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 40, No. 1, 43-63, 1961.
doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1961.tb03976.x        Google Scholar

32. Landau, H. J. and H. Widom, "Eigenvalue distribution of time and frequency limiting," Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 77, No. 2, 469-481, 1980.
doi:10.1016/0022-247x(80)90241-3        Google Scholar

33. Wilson, Stephen G., Digital Modulation and Coding, Prentice Hall, Inc., 1995.

34. Goodman, J. W., Introduction to Fourier Optics, Roberts & Company Publishers, 2005.
doi:10.1063/1.3035549

35. Konenkov, N., "Dipole and quadrupole resonance excitation in linear quadrupoles," European Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Vol. 30, No. 1, 3-37, 2024.
doi:10.1177/14690667231204359        Google Scholar

36. Yang, Haoyu, Shuhe Li, Yuzhe Ma, Bei Yu, and Evangeline F. Y. Young, "GAN-OPC: Mask optimization with lithography-guided generative adversarial nets," Proceedings of the 55th Annual Design Automation Conference, 1-6, 2018.
doi:10.1145/3195970.3196056

37. Sun, Shuyuan, Fan Yang, Bei Yu, Li Shang, and Xuan Zeng, "Efficient ILT via multi-level lithography simulation," 2023 60th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC), 1-6, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2023.
doi:10.1109/dac56929.2023.10247704